Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

Rated R?
Does anyone think it will be rated R? And if not, what?

Seeing as its a kids film, I doubt it would be an R. But as the film doesnt come out for another three years this whole conversaI LOVE Ha?RRY POTTERRRRRRRRRRtions pointless. - Vaysey  – Gryffindor 15:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * There is a possibility it will be R. At least PG 13...User:Matoro183 19:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Why in the world word it be rated R? --Lupin &amp; Kingsley 23:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, especially if you don't have any proof to back this claim up. -Adv193 16:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Matoro was just saying it was possible that it will be rated R in response to somebody else's question. He never said that it was definitively going to be rated R; it's his opinion, not a "claim" requiring proof.


 * While I personally doubt it will receive this rating, considering the audience for the novels, it is possible -- R ratings are typically given for violence, especially violence that includes blood. Deathly Hallows includes scenes of Harry and Ron losing teeth (Harry in the Battle over Little Whinging, Ron when he's punched by a Snatcher), which has to be bloody; Ron severely bleeds from being Splinched; Hermione gets tortured (even if they don't show it directly, as in the book, it's an extremely violent and disturbing act); Harry gets bitten by a snake after it comes out of a corpse (again, disturbing); numerous characters die... There's a lot of violence in Deathly Hallows, and I can't see the filmmakers being able to depict the Battle of Hogwarts as bloodless, even if curses tend to make deaths a little 'cleaner', as it were.


 * However, nobody has "proof" about the rating, seeing as the films won't be coming out for years (as Vaysey already pointed out). Oread 16:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Matoro I never mint to accuse you of saying that it will be rated R, sorry about that. --Lupin &amp; Kingsley 20:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think the DH films will get an R rating, given that their core audience is under 18, but I do think they will be a strong PG-13. DH, as a book, is dark and violent, so bringing those elements to the screen is unavoidable if the filmmakers want to do justice to the original story. But I do think some stuff will have to be left out or toned done considerably because it is simply too intense for family movies. Two particularly gory scenes that come to mind are George's ear and Snape's death. Indirect camera angles could be used for the ear, like was done with Pettigrew's hand in the GoF film, but I think it will more likely be left out, as it is not integral to the plot. Snape's death cannot be cut, because it is integral to the plot, but they'll definitely tone it down, maybe having him die from venom instead of extreme blood loss.


 * At this point, though, everything about how violent the movies will be or what ratings they will receive is speculation. We'll just have to wait and see as more information comes in over the next few months. &#x2605; S t a r s t u f f (Owl me!) 14:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

No it should not be a 15 (R rating). The story of Harry Potter is for kids no matter how dark it gets. It will most likely be a 12A (PG-13) though. 90.211.84.247 13:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Considering we've had two Potter films get PG-13 already, and given the level of violence in the book, I would say a PG-13 is likely. There's nothing in the book that justifies an R rating (certainly nothing that resembles the silly love scene rumors kicking around). 23skidoo 03:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with Matoro, Lupin & Kingsley, 23skiddo, Vaysed & Oread. There's really no reason to make the last movie an "R" rated film. If they do parents would never let their little kids see it. -- T.J. (talk ) 15:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure it will be a 12. The last 3 have been 12s (but Half-Blood Prince was a 12A). So maybe it will be a 12A. But this talk page is for talking about improvements to the article, not ratings.  Tur bo  Golf  06:06, October 24, 2009 (UTC)

I think i will definetly be PG-13 becuase it's too voilent to be PG, and not enough to be R. If it was PG then all these 5 years olds would go with their parents and if it was R then no kids under 15 would go (mostly). User:HermioneG2000

yep PG.........13.... Speedysnitch 13:34, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

I live in sweden and there is a age-limit for HP2, And that sucks cause i'm almost 14 and the age-limit is up to 15 which means i can't see the movie :@ I think it's unfair ... User:MSrock

Two Articles
When the films are closer, should this article be split in two? RaggieSoft 04:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * There are two films, so I definately think that the articles should be split in two at some point. --Freakatone 12:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

well what I dont understand is why they are spliting it into 2 movies??? --Its_A_Sammy 12:53, 23 May 2008
 * There's too much important information in the final book. If they cut out/alter too much, the movie loses its faithfulness to the novel.   And they can't fit everything into, call it, a two and a half hour movie. --Cubs Fan2007 19:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree, we should split this article into two pages. ÈnŔîčö Ravenclawcrest.jpg(Send me an Owl ) 11:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I also agree --<font face="Comic Sans MS" color=Black>H <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">e <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">l <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">l <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">a <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">b <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">o <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">r <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">e Hallows.png (<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">Deathly Hallows )<font face=Comic Sans MS color=Black>(cont <font face="Comic Sans MS" color=Black>ribs)


 * I personally think the article should be split when we know where the films will be split -Smonocco 12:07, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with Smonocoo --<font face="Comic Sans MS" color=Black>H <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">e <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">l <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">l <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">a <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">b <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">o <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">r <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">e Hallows.png (<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="Black">Deathly Hallows )<font face=Comic Sans MS color=Black>(cont <font face="Comic Sans MS" color=Black>ribs)


 * I agree that this article should be split when we have more information on how Parts I and II are going to differ (plot, cast, etc.). I think we should change the title to "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (films)" for now. <font color="Green">&#x2605; <font face="Times" color="green">S <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">a <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">r <font face="Times" color="green">s <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">u <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">f <font face="Times" color="green">f <font face="Times" color="darkgreen">(Owl me!) 14:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

If there is going to a huge difference in the cast between both films then I'll agree with the idea of splitting this article into two. If not then I'll that needs to be done is create 3 cast sections, one for characters that appear in both movies and the other two for those that only appear in one movie each. It also depends if there are any changes at all between the books and the movie that occur in this film because there is no telling what may happen until the release date. -Adv193 14:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Furthermore this also reminds me of why I created an omissions section for the film version of the Goblet of Fire, because it had to do with controlling potential overflowing information since I did it to make it easier to navigate. Though from what I figure there is likely going to be enough information that is massive enough that will require the need to create 2 pages for this film to control the massive details. -Adv193 01:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Cast
The cast list is reaching a ridiculous size if we continue like this. Only the main cast (the cast that is always on the posters and promo's and dvd's) should be noted like this. The rest of them should be in the text down below. That would mean that aside from the trio the following actors would be on the list (alphabetical order): Helena Bonham Carter, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Brendon Gleeson, Richard Griffiths, John Hurt, Jason Isaacs, Alan Rickman, Fiona Shaw, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, David Thewlis, Julie Walters and Mark Williams. 16 names, the rest in the article section. If you agree, I'm willing to change it.


 * At the moment I have to disagree with you, as we are still early on into the filming I feel the cast list is an important link as to which characters are being included in the films. As time goes by and the article is split for the two films, that may be the time to edit it.-- Darth Jadious 15:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

shell cottage
i dont think that is sheel cottage with one of the link it might be malfoy manor 76.17.149.95 07:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Hogwarts Students
Does anyone know where it is confirmed that Scarlett Byrne, Louis Doyle and Hugh Mitchell are reprising their roles as Pansy Parkinson, Ernie Macmillan and Colin Creevey in Deathly Hallows. I can't find them confirmed anywhere.

According To www.mugglenet.com they are all going to be in Harry Potter Deathly Hallows Pt. 2 --<font face="Verdana" color="FireBrick">Bongo2009  20:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Where? All I can find is a place with castmembers and all of them are listed Waiting For Confirmation.

Charlie Weasley
Does anybody know if Charlie Weasley has been or will be cast in Deathly Hallows? --Adumb1881 12:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

No word yet, as far as I'm aware. I'm sure he will be in the movie though. Jayden Matthews 12:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

He is cast, I believe! I only don't who is gonna play him. Tim Lemmens 8:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Could we please come to an agreement as to whether he will be in the film. He's been on and off constantly over the past year. There is a source on the article saying that Alex Crockford will reprise his role:, but I don't feel it's a good enough reference.
 * Also, the article says that George Harris will reprise his role as Kingsley Shacklebolt with this source: . I also don't think this is reliable enough.
 * What does everyone else think?
 * Joeworthy 11:14, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Seeing how almost every named character has been confirmed to be in the movie, it would be very odd if Charlie Weasley were not in the movie. The same goes for Kingsley Shacklebolt. I say we leave them be, and in the very off chance that they are not in the movie (which will lead to many fans being very disappointed), we will then remove them. Clearly, not everyone who is in the movie likes to state that they are. We have seen this as these people have not stated they are in the movie. Yet we have lots of extras and small unnamed roles confirmed. Unfortunatly, the only way everyone will ultimately be confirmed will be when we can actually see the movies, in November 2010 and July 2011.
 * CoolDudeAl 23:13, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, as far as the soruce's reliablity, I would say they are at least as reliable as Ariana Dumbledore or The Grey Lady. One which uses the word "rumor", and the other which is on a blog, although appearently the person is trustworthy.
 * CoolDudeAl 23:36, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, as far as the soruce's reliablity, I would say they are at least as reliable as Ariana Dumbledore or The Grey Lady. One which uses the word "rumor", and the other which is on a blog, although appearently the person is trustworthy.
 * CoolDudeAl 23:36, June 26, 2010 (UTC)




 * The source that is given for Charlie Weasley in Part 2 is only the source for Part 1. When you look in the source for Part 2 then you won't find Charlie. So it is not sure that he is also in Part 2.Harry granger 20:01, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but many of the actors and actresses have not stated whether or not they will be in the first half, the second half, or both halves. So the best bet is to use the book, and Charlie, along with the rest of his family, is present in the Battle of Hogwarts, which, of course, takes place in Part 2 of the films.
 * CoolDudeAl 21:34, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * CoolDudeAl 21:34, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Cast List
The cast list is starting to look a little speculated, some of the listed actors/actresses I'm unsure of. This current list claims that Tiana Benjamin is returning for her role of Angelina Johnson, however a few months back in an EastEnders Q&A's I asked this question;

"Will you be returning for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows?"

and she replied

"I don't think so, for the moment I am very happily staying on EastEnders   - for as long as they will have me! I don't know much about the film other than it's been split into two parts. I did have an amazing time on the film and doing the video game and it's something that I'll always be proud to have been part of, but being in EastEnders is a childhood dream for me."

But this list confirms her as returning without any source etc; Is there any source that states her return? Also the same for Lee Jordan's actor returning too, the last I heard he was studying to become a fashion designer and didn't return as he was on a Sky TV show or something.


 * I also noticed that it states that Alex Crockford will be returning as Charlie Weasley. I don't believe this has been confirmed. -Smonocco 23:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Just checked I.M.Db. and apparently he will be returning but i've noticed that, according to the article several other actors will be returning, however no sources are provided. -Smonocco 14:19, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

Grawp "recasting"???
I removed the following statement from the casting section: Recasting for Rubeus Hagrid's giant half-brother Grawp has yet to be announced. I'm not sure if it's just a case of somebody trying to be thorough, but Grawp was a CGI creation in the last movie, so there is no recasting to be done, unless I missed something that indicates Grawp will be played by a flesh-and-blood actor in DH. 23skidoo 15:27, September 9, 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, Grawp's movements and look was based and filmed with actor Tony Maudsley. You can kind of say that he played Grawp in Order of the Phoenix. Lilleby
 * I agree, and think the statement should be reposted in the article. FelixFreak 16:17, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree, and think the statement should be reposted in the article. FelixFreak 16:17, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

The name of the article.
I am seriously concerned about the name of this article. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is ONE film in TWO parts. IT IS NOT TWO SEPERATE FILMS. The name should be changed to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film). David Heyman said that the Deathly Hallows is ONE film, NOT two. See http://en.wikipedia.org/Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows_(film)

I request that this page is renamed to the said name above, as there is evidence to show that it's 1 film. Thank You Lee7003 12:22, October 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * It's one story, but it's still two films, one to be released in 2010 and the other in 2011. It's not much different from the Back to the Future trilogy or The Lord of the Rings trilogy. - <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color="FF8000">Nick O'Demus 13:16, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * Your comparison is faulty. Back to the Future is a trilogy, as it is three self-contained but connected seperate works. But The Lord of the Rings is not a trilogy, but one single book with a single self-contained story, which the original publisher insisted on splitting into three volumes because of costs. -a Tolkiendil 217.95.184.252 14:47, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

It's going to be two films so it requires two articles. We know now where the films are to be split, so I propose that we start to think about breaking up the article. Jayden Matthews 14:12, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, the article should be divided into two. Lilleby 19:31, December 8, 2009 (UTC)


 * I also agree, and what David Heyman said was a metaphor (The One You Fear 09:28, June 18, 2011 (UTC))

William
Is William going to play in this movie? He only signed up for An education :S He doesn't want to answer my question so i ask you guys. OLiViA 20:17, October 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * If you are referring to Mark Williams. Yes, he will.source-link --<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color="darkblue">ÈnŔîčö DC [[Image:Ravenclawcrest.jpg|25px]](<font face="Times" color="brown">Send me an Owl! ) 07:01, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

I think he means William Melling, who played Nigel in the last three films. Jayden Matthews 08:50, December 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure about him, since i haven't received any reports yet ragarding his coming back for DH. --<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color="darkblue">ÈnŔîčö DC [[Image:Ravenclawcrest.jpg|25px]](<font face="Times" color="brown">Send me an Owl! ) 09:13, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * He is, as his death replaces Colin Creevey's {The One You Fear 09:30, June 18, 2011 (UTC)}

Professor Trewlany
As sad I am to see Emma Thompson not returning as Sybil, I am thrilled at the possibility of having Nicollete Sheridan take on the role. I am a huge fan of ABC's Desperate Housewives, and would love to see womanizer Edie Britt play such a wacky and interesting character! What do you guys think?--Bella Goth 02:36, December 30, 2009 (UTC)Bella Goth

Two Articles?
Does anyone know if this will be split into two different articles when the movies get closer to their release? Jack5555 16:32, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * The point has been raised above. They probably will split the article, but for now they shouldn't because there are still aspects that we don't know about the way the films will be divided. For example, I find it hard to imagine that Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, and some of the other big names won't appear in some way in the first film. I re-read DH this past weekend and I could see circumstances where they could insert Hogwarts scenes into the first half of the story. On the other hand it's possible that characters appearing in the first part of the story in the books - say, Tonks for example - might only appear in Part 2 of the movie. What I'm saying is until we get confirmation as to what's been added, what's been shifted around, etc., it should probably stay one article for now, at least until the first movie is released. 23skidoo 14:45, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

"Because she is an American"
I deleted the following statement regarding the question as to whether Eleanor Columbus is returning as Susan Bones: "who is very unlikely to reappear as she is an American". What is this garbage? No source, just a statement saying an actress isn't likely to appear because she has the wrong passport. Give me a break. Where's the source for this? Now if you were to say she wasn't likely to appear because her dad isn't directing the thing, that would be fine. 23skidoo 14:40, February 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * For all the previous movies all speaking roles had to be played by British actors per JKR's request. --<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black" >JKoch Ravenclawcrest.jpg(<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="1" color="Red">Owl Me! ) 15:02, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * But she doesn't have a large presense in the final book; she's just one of the many people fighting in the battle. I don't recall her even having any lines.
 * Percy's actor is from New Zealand and he has a good number of linesCharmedh2ogirl 16:01, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Percy's actor is from New Zealand and he has a good number of linesCharmedh2ogirl 16:01, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Lots Of Unconfirmed Cast Members
I've noticed there are quite a few actors on the cast list here that have been unconfirmed to return to the film and with no references to back them up: Also, the citation for Richard Cubison as Antonin Dolohov doesn't actually mention him.
 * Ralph Ineson as Amycus Carrow,
 * Alex Crockford as Charlie Weasley,
 * George Harris as Kingsley Shacklebolt,
 * Johnpaul Castrianni as Yaxley.

I know it has been confirmed somewhere that Pete Perry will play Dedalus Diggle and Louise Walpole will play Hestia Jones, but I think we need to find a reference because I can't find one.

Hopefully, we will be able to find citations, but if no-one can, I think these will have to be deleted from this page.

Harry granger 19:00, May 20, 2010 (UTC) I found a source, that Johnpaul Castrianni plays a Death Eater in HP 7, here: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=71872

Great, thank you! I think this is confirmation that Johnpaul Castrianni will be playing Yaxley in the 2 movies and I will edit all pages accordingly. Joeworthy 19:05, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

Harry granger 19:10, May 20, 2010 (UTC) That's my first thank you. Thanks for it. Always pleased, when I can help.

New Trailer
Can someone provide a link to the new trailer with the quidditch picth, voldemort chase etc.? Thanks

Sky Shadow All Hail Optimus Prime(and Hermione). 07:35, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sky Shadow, Potter sneak peek (not trailer) was revealed by Warner Brothers during Showest, which is exclusively reserved for a professional audience... So this images are not intended to be revealed to a wider public, at least at this time and under this shape! Bye

09:13, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Chris Columbus.
I think it's a good idea if Chris Columbus direct the epilogue, because he does a good job in the first two films that are less mature and more childish. Anyone known a notice about he? Or you think it's not a good idea?

--ArthurCh 16:27, April 4, 2010 (UTC)ArthurCh8

Harry granger 18:42, May 11, 2010 (UTC) Hi, I have new information. Since it does not function on the film site I give it here. There is a new actor and a new actress. 1. Danielle Bilyard as Extra, source: http://www.uk.filmcrewpro.com/view.php?uid=280196 2. Jennifer Clegg as a Snatcher, source: http://www.uk.dancerspro.com/view.php?uid=240425 Perhaps it does interest someone.

Cast List
Can an admin please rule on if the cast list should be how Jayce wants it, or as it was prior to this? Thank you in advance.

CoolDudeAl 20:39, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

The cast list, as it stands, is full of misinformation and speculation. The descriptions of each character, for example, are completely and utterly useless, not to mention riddled with bias and personal opinion. If someone comes to this site looking for information on the characters then they can find it in the respective articles. The "TBA" is massively speculative. We don't even know if all the characters from the book are going to be in the film, and we certainately should'nt be listing them in the cast. Having a section of the cast dedicated to actors who have appeared in preivious Harry Potter films and who may or may not appear in this one is likewise, redundent, and speculative. The cast list should therfore stay as it is, as per my last edit. –K.A.J•T•C•E• 07:09, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Well, at least I got a well thought out response. I wouldn't say it was full of "misinformation and speculation", that seems a bit strong. The TBA section never say that all those characters were defiantly appearing in the film. In fact it said almost the opposite. My only other point would be that no one has had a problem with these things on the page for several months. I don't understand why now it would be a problem. And I can guarantee you that some of those characters listed (at the least the epilogue children), will be in the movie. But whatever pleases you and Jayce I suppose will have to stand for now.

CoolDudeAl 17:10, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Wiki's are always works in progress. There are a great many things that need to be changed, and they don't always get done straight away. That doesn't mean we shouldn't bother, or that we should just accept substandard articles as they are. The key principle of wiki editing is verification. If an encyclopedia cannot verify it's contents then it has no credibility. That's why the cast list must only contain actors who have been confirmed to be appearing in the film. Thank you for understanding. –K.A.J•T•C•E• 17:36, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have found another actor for Deathly Hallows. It is Jim Goldstone as Ministry of Magic policeman, look here: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=301531 Harry granger 18:54, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have already found other actors. Here they are:

Ifeoma Oboko as Extra, source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3894361/

Sarah Jane O'Neill as Ministry Wizard, source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3506359/

George Potts as Balding Wizard, source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0693431/

Catherine Laine as Ministry Typist, source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3559763/ [[User:Harry granger|Harry granger] 19:16, May 25, 2010 (UTC)]

I added them. Thanks for finding them. CoolDudeAl 22:04, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have already found two new actors. Here they are: Catherine Cordell as muggle, source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=266472

Lily Tello as Student/Extra, source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=254438 Harry granger 12:04, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Someone called the actress of Astoria Greengrass with the name: Jade Olivia, but that are only her christian names. Her surname is Gordon. She is the friend of Draco Malfoy actor Tom Felton. Harry granger 17:41, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have found another actress for Deathly Hallows. It is Natalie Hallam. She is in Part 1 as Muggle and in Part 2 as Death eater, look here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1900568/ Harry granger 18:38, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Hallam also portrayed this teacher. If the teacher appears in the DH film (which to date is unknown) should we list the character as Death Eater then?--Rodolphus 19:10, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know. I found it ridiculous, too. Part 1 = Muggle, Part 2 = Death Eater. Harry granger 19:14, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Bumping--Rodolphus 16:54, June 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * I hadn't seen this discussion, but I think its really strange how they've had an actress play a professor for three films, but now she's going to be a muggle and then a death eater. All sounds a bit strange to me. Natalie Hallam's wikipedia page even says that she will be appearing in both of the Deathly Hallows films.
 * Does anyone here have myspace (unfortunately I don't) because we would be able to send her a message and ask her which of this information is correct and which is just speculative. Her page is here: http://www.myspace.com/adventurenatz
 * Joeworthy 17:36, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

If anyone writes to her, we can ask her if she portrays Sinistra, Vector or someone else.--Rodolphus 17:43, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

It isn't really that surprising. Obviously the film makers like her, as they keep using her. In the last three films, they needed more professors, so they had her play one. In Deathly Hallows Part 1, they needed more muggles, probably when Harry, Ron, and Hermione are running away after the wedding, so they cast her as one. In Deathly Hallows Part 2, they needed more Death Eaters, for the battle of Hogwarts, so they cast her as one. It's not like her role as a professor has been that promenent in the last three films, nor do we even no which teacher she is supposted to be, so I don't think they saw it as that big of a deal. CoolDudeAl 04:54, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have found another actor for Deathly Hallows. It is Jesse Hart as Erik Slave, obviously a new role only for the second film. Here is the source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2321893/ Harry granger 20:46, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have found another actress for Deathly Hallows. It is Georgie May as Gryffindor student. Here is the source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=306467 Harry granger 20:58, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have found another actress for Deathly Hallows. It is Jade Stanger as Student, look here: Harry granger 17:13, July 4, 2010 (UTC) Sorry, I can't open my own source. I will better give it the old way. http://www.kids.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=204258 Harry granger 17:15, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have found another actor for Deathly Hallows. It is Piotr Ochman as Wizard. Here is the source: http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows:_Part_2 Harry granger 20:57, July 9, 2010 (UTC) Sorry, wrong source. Here is the right: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=251240 Harry granger 21:00, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have already found other actors. Here they are: Pauline Stone as Hogwarts nurse, source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2780356/ Tony Kirwood as Death Eater, source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=316233 Freddie Hogan as Terry Skeres, source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=312848 Harry granger 19:07, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I found again a new actor for Part 2. Holly Murdoch as Slytherin school girl, source: http://www.uk.dancerspro.com/view.php?uid=318366 Harry granger 19:12, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Two missing snatchers
According to their web pages, http://www.chloebruce.co.uk and http://www.gracebruce.co.uk, both Cloe and Grace Bruce play snatchers in the upcoming Harry Potter movie.

MarcusSteiner 11:59, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Cast list for Deathly Hallows: Part I
Hi, I have found a new actor for part 1. It is Chris Bowe as Commuter. Here is the source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2778865/ Harry granger 17:06, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have found a new actors for part 1.

1. Helen Harbord as Ministry of Magic worker. Here is the source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=220224

2. Guinevere Edwards as Ministry wizard. Here is the source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=260992

3. Bella Sokol as Auror. Here is the source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=140154

4. Andy Callaghan as Wizard parent. Here is the source: http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=217453 Harry granger 18:08, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Trailer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPUjURJaQf4&playnext_from=TL&videos=etwJaVXTk5M&feature=subUmishiru 06:52, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Hogwarts
I just saw the newest trailer and I couldn't believe what Hogwarts looks like during/after the battle. It was so cool, yet so sad in a way. Very bittersweet. I love how the awesome all the rubble looks, but Hogwarts is like a home to almost everyone. Anyone else feel the same way as me?--Bella Goth 02:11, July 6, 2010 (UTC)Bella Goth

I know what you mean, I feel the same way. All but one of my favorite characters dies! (The only surviver on my list of favs is George Weasley.) :(

Ernie
Hey i found a source that says that Jamie Marks will play as Ernie Macmillian. Here's the source: http://ajmanagement.co.uk/clientDetail.asp?intClientID=515.

Can someone please add this is into the article, because the article is locked and i can't post it myself.65.126.115.206 04:32, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Voldemort appears alone
I noticed that in the trailer posted on this site, Voldemort appears alone in the scene where Harry is "killed". In the book, his deatheaters are with him. Should this be posted on the "Differences from the book" page, or is it too unimportant? FelixFreak 16:11, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

If you look carefully in that scene, you will see that the death eaters are behing Voldemort. They are blurry and hard to see, but they are there.Icecreamdif 18:26, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Actors
I'm considering that very many players are on both sides, but instead of putting so many ridiculous characters, should return: - Angelina Johnson - Colin Creevey - Hannah Abbott - Grawp

Qusiera also ask:

- Anybody Jesse Hart would confirm me? Since in the IMDb cast erased. - Who interpreted to Amycus Carrow? I'm not sure whether Ralph Ineson

Malham Cove
Just found out that Malham Cove in England is a location for the Deathly Hallows film. Could someone find out what was being filmed there and add it to the article please.

More Actors
Find two more players:

- Steve Poulsen as Teacher Wizard http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=237113

- Rebecca Harrison as Extra http://www.uk.castingcallpro.com/view.php?uid=302754 190.160.50.21 23:30, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Mundungus
Mundungus is not in Part 2:http://www.harrypotterfanzone.com/2010/10/exclusive-interview-with-andy-linden-mundungus-fletcher-in-deathly-hallows/ - Mr. Mortimer, 22:40, 13 December 2010

fred weasley
We will all miss fred weasley!:(

May my dear Fred Weasley rest in peace. :( When I first started reading the Harry Potter books, I developed HUGE crushes on both Fred and George. (Pathetic, I know.) So when I got to the part in the Deathly Hallows where Fred dies, I put the book down, and just stared at the ceiling for an eternity, whispering "No no no no no no..." over and over again. When I finally finished the book, I was depressed for forever. (I'm starting to get depressed again. Excuse me while I curl up into a corner and cry my eyes out.) :,( I.Heart.Fred.And.George 19:05, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Part 2 trailer
I'm terribly sorry if this isn't meant to be asked here, but I'm curious about something(if it has been revealed yet). Does anyone know when the "HP7 Part 2" trailer will be released? User:CJSFanBlack Pearl,HMS Interceptor,Queen Anne's Revenge 03:37, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Title scene
Where does the image of the title scene come from? It looks cool, but I wonder if it's real. --PerryPeverell - (talk) - (contributions) 21:29, March 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * They are fan-made read here. Should they still be on the article then? --PerryPeverell - (talk) - (contributions) 22:54, March 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, they'll be removed. Thank you for researching this. - <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color="FF8000">Nick O'Demus 23:04, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

New pictures?
I Found this pic ..I have not seen it before .. Have you seen this before? Is it a new Pic?

That's not official. Its cool, but I've seen it before. There was also a really cool one for Part 1 with Harry, Ron, and Hermione on it and the Deathly Hallows symbol is framed around them. Gryffindor1991 16:57, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

-That is not official. It's just a really well-done poster made by artist "theyoungtook" at Deviantart: http://browse.deviantart.com/?qh=&section=&global=1&q=harry+potter+deathly+hallows+part+2+poster#/d2ffojnDadadaft 22:08, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Countdown is wrong.
I assume the countdown on the Deathly Hallows Part 2 Film page is counting down to July 15 (Correct me if I am am wrong) It currently states 114 Days as of Tuesday April 5th there are 100 Days until July 15th.

It's 94 days until it comes out as of today, the 12th of April.

Cast
If an actor films scenes in a movie but they are cut do they still go in the cast list? Toby Regbo wasn't in the movie, nor was Jamie Campbell Bower or Sean Biggerstaff.

Wherefrom will you know that they are not in the film? I think it was not the whole film only a part which was shown to a group of people, so it may be they are in. Harry granger 18:51, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

I was at the advanced screening. Some special effects were missing but the whole film was shown. There was no mention of Dumbledore's past, and no scenes involving Toby Regbo or JCB.

That's interesting and very sad. I hoped after they made two films that there were more scenes retained. But I fear there are many fine scenes in the book they don't put in the film. Sad but true. Harry granger 20:18, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

It was probably the most faithfull out of all the films. They already messed Dumbledore's past up in Part 1, so it wouldn't have made much sense to include it in Part 2. 86.164.160.152 20:30, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

I had read that Aberforth would tell his family story to the trio as he does in the book. That would make sense, but it seems they did'nt put it in. Harry granger 20:38, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

He explains about Ariana but nothing else.

Differences from the books
Whoa, is this stuff really true? Lavender and Scabior get killed off? Voldy goes after Ron and Hermione with a tsunami in the Chamber of Secrets? Harry snaps the Elder Wand in two? Bellatrix literally gets torn apart by Mrs. Weasley and Voldy crumbles to dust like Quirrell? Looking forward to the movie if it is (that is even more than I was for the previous ten years). And coming from someone who's seen Saw, but those hypocrites cut Wormtail's death cause "suicide would be too graphic", yet they make Snape's death scene gorier than in the book? Really? Voldy actually slashes his throat open with the Elder Wand? (though I suppose that'll have roughly the same amount of graphics as Sectumsempra) Ghostkaiba297 02:21, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

And one more thing: It listed Wormtail (Peter Pettigrew) and Scorpius in the cast, but it also listed them under omitted characters. Which is true? Ghostkaiba297 02:22, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

there is actually 97 days till the 15th of july

The movie was test screened a few days ago for a select audience. Everything mentioned above is true. Voldemort doesn't go after Ron and Hermione specifically. He attacks the castle from a distance with a powerfull spell which causes the Chamber of Secrets to flood. Although the actors playing Wormtail and Scorpius Malfoy may have filmed their scenes they weren't in the movie.


 * In that case, I heard someone say Wormtail was thrown out a window by Voldemort. If he doesn't appear in the movie, then either a.) this was mentioned in the film or b.) it doesn't happen at all. If that part is true, can you put it under "Differences from the books", and if not, can you say so in reply to this? Ghostkaiba297 03:24, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

I wonder wherefrom you will know that Buckbeak, the centaurs and the houseelves are not in the film and that Nagini is not in a protective sphere. When I remember right, it was said that in this testscreening the special effects are not in yet. But all the above mentioned are CGI. So can you be sure? Harry granger 18:05, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Until July 15, this is all speculation and shouldn't be included in our articles for potentially true or false spoiler reasons. The Knights Who Say Ni 05:21, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with Knights on this subject. It has been posted on here that Harry's wand was thrown away in HP7 Part 1, but if you remember, Ron had given Harry that Snatcher's wand, the Blackthorn. The Blackthorn wand was more than likely the wand that was thrown away, and Harry will still be able to repair his original wand by using the Elder Wand. Whether or not he then proceeds to break the Elder Wand in two will remain to be seen. I don't believe that they would have allowed Greyback to throw away Harry's original wand so unceramoniously. They would have done a close up of the broken wand laying in the grass, and of Harry's reaction to loosing his real wand. Balladore 16:50, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Countdown to Part 2?
Hey guys! I'm a little confused about something. On this page, it states that there are 103 days till Part 2. But i just checked a calendar website and it said that from this day(April 14, 2011) there are 92 days till July 15, 2011. If somebody could clear this up for me or maybe change the clock that would be great. Anybody agree with me?Drummerwiz92 14:09, April 14, 2011 (UTC)Drummerwiz92

Alecto and Amycus Carrow?
What role have they got in the film?? have they the same scenes that in the film?

Does Madam Pomfrey fought in the Battle?

please, if it is possible. answer me. thanks very much.

Differences from the book
In the differences from the book section, it states that the statues of knights come to life and fight for the school. I can't understand why this is a difference when I clearly remember Professor McGonagal bewitching them to life to fight. "Hogwarts is threatened!" she screams. It was right after her duel with Snape. Can anybody clear this up for me please, because even other sites are stating that it was put in for the movie! Help me please!Drummerwiz92 14:36, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

The Final Battle
PLEASE PLEASE ANSWER!!! Most questions will probably be able to be answered if someone watched the test screening of HP Deathly Hallows Part 2

-Does anyone know if there will be the many creatures (giants, acromantulas, etc.) in the final battle or will it just consist of wizards and witches? I know there will be dementors, but any other creatures?

(Maybe no one really knows because the test screening was not done with all of teh effects, but maybe there were scenes that hinted that there will be a large amount of creatures)

-Do the carrows even have at least any lines in the movie? IT sounds like they're not even included in any of the scenes?

-I thought that Fred's death scene (along with Tonks and Remus) will not be shown in the movie, but they will only be shown dead in the hospital after the trio return from witnessing Snape's death. Can someone please clarify!

-This question will probably have no answer, but why did the producers even replace Colin Creevey with a new character (Nigel) when they could use the actor who plays Nigel as a new Colin Creevey? I find it senseless.(sigh)

-Will they add the broom scene (Saving Malfoy in the Room of Requirement) in the movie or will the trio just... save them through another way?

-Did anyone see the diadem and how it looked like?

-Will Lavender Brown be killed gruesomely like in the book by Fenrir Greyback? Apparently in the book she is attacked by fully transformed werewolf Greyback and he mawls her until he gets blown away by Hermione and Lavender is left twitching and lifeless.

-Was the forcefield that disintegrated the Death Eaters part of the book too or was it something that was added for show?

-Is there the scene in the Great Hall where the Slytherin house wanted (especially Pansy Parkinson) to take Harry and give him to Voldemort?

-Do they show the scene where Hermione and Ron actually stab the cup?

It sounds pretty disappointing when I hear the MANY points about the differences in the movie compared to the book. I just hope that this LAST movie will be the MOST FAITHFUL EVER. (crossing fingers) :(

I wasn't there but I've read many reports.

- Giants and Acromantulas are in, no house elves, thankfully.

- No don't think so

- Freds death isn't seen, along with Lupin and Tonks. HOWEVER, there is a scene in the battle where Fred is cornered and disarmed, leaving the audience to wonder what will happen next, until his dead body is seen in the great hall. Lupin and Tonks are also seen dead there.

- I think because it would have hurt continuity

- Yep, its in

-There are pictures of it on this wiki. Just search diadem horocrux.

-Yep, Lavender is mauled and then seen lifeless, but there is no dialouge saying she's dead.

- Nope, wasn't in the book, but sounds awesome anyway.

-Yep!

-Yep! The kiss takes place in that scene also.

This movie will rock!!!The 3 brothers

Difference with the book
If it's true that we don't see Fred's death, it's awful and extremely dispointing!!! I hope they will change idea and show it!! I really don't understand why they change the way of dying of Fred! That's really dispointing! 70.82.182.27 00:25, April 26, 2011 (UTC)Anne-Maire

They're probably doing this to avoid an R rating from the MPAA, as their goal is a solid PG-13. FirePuppy 19:02, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for answer me! :) But I think it's awful if they did that! Fred's dead taking a large part in the book, Harry feels like the world is ending. So it's gonna be really disapointing if they cut Fred's dead. :(

Anne-Marie70.82.182.27 23:46, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Do we see George's ear missing on part 2? I hope that we see that it's injured!

70.82.182.27 23:46, May 29, 2011 (UTC)Anne-Marie

New Pictures
I found new pictures posted up by snitchseeker and there are a total of 65! All of the pictures are really epic with new looks at Aberforth, Gringotts Bank Heist, (a lot of) the Battle of Hogwarts, Chamber of Secrets, and much more!!! :D ENJOY!!!!

http://www.snitchseeker.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=1954&pos=0

Ravenclaw Tower
If anyone was at the test screening, does Harry go to Ravenclaw Tower? I read he goes there alone without Luna, and the Carrows aren't there. Gryffindor1991 19:04, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Flashback children
In this section is to be read: Robert Javis as young James Potter. Who is Robert Javis? I only know Robert Jarvis as 15 year old James Potter. The source leads to Rohan Gotobed, who plays the "flashback teen" Sirius Black. There is nothing to read about Robert Javis or James Potter. I think that this is a mistake. Harry granger 15:52, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Voldemort dies like Quirrell
If Lord Voldemort dies in Deathly Hallows: Part 2 like Quirinus Quirrell did in Philosopher's Stone, crumbling, why does a picture show Voldemort lying on the ground in the Entrance Courtyard.


 * Voldermort doesn't die like Quirrell. Where did you see that? He dies since his Killing Curse rebounded. <font face="Segoe Script" size="3" color="Indigo" >Head.Boy.Hog <font face="Currier" size="2" color="Green">(Talk To Me)  21:41, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * On the Wiki page for Part 2, under the Differences from the Book section, it states that that Voldemort will crumbles to ash after being struck with his killing curse, similar to Quirrel. This may just be part of the test screening and not be used in the actual movie, but we'll just have to see. Personally, I don't like the idea, because it sounds childish to me for some reason. But I'll still greatly enjoy the movie either way!Drummerwiz92 17:04, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * If the test screening is not official, does it have a chance that they will not cut Fred's dead scene? I hope so, I hope that's gonna be like in the book! His dead took a large part in the book!
 * 70.82.182.27 02:12, May 24, 2011 (UTC)By Anne-Marie
 * If the test screening is not official, does it have a chance that they will not cut Fred's dead scene? I hope so, I hope that's gonna be like in the book! His dead took a large part in the book!
 * 70.82.182.27 02:12, May 24, 2011 (UTC)By Anne-Marie
 * If the test screening is not official, does it have a chance that they will not cut Fred's dead scene? I hope so, I hope that's gonna be like in the book! His dead took a large part in the book!
 * 70.82.182.27 02:12, May 24, 2011 (UTC)By Anne-Marie
 * If the test screening is not official, does it have a chance that they will not cut Fred's dead scene? I hope so, I hope that's gonna be like in the book! His dead took a large part in the book!
 * 70.82.182.27 02:12, May 24, 2011 (UTC)By Anne-Marie

Maybe...
If the film ever gets an "R" rating (which could be likely), maybe we should send Howlers to the MPAA, the same kind that Ron's mom sent to him. What do you think? FirePuppy 00:52, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

It will probably be PG-13, but it could probably be a better movie if it was rated R. Remember in Part 1 when they cut out Wormtail's hand killing him so that they could keep the PG-13 rating? If you are under 17, you can get in to an R movie if you have someone over 21 with you anyway.Icecreamdif 17:14, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Well my parents don't give a damn about violence and they buy me the tickets anyway because they know that sooner or later I will watch it when it comes out on DVD AND they think Harry Potter is childish so they will probably ignore the R part. Yay me! — <font face="Vivaldi" size="4" color="Black"> Firefox1095 — 23:15, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Will Harry use the elder wand to mend his broken wand in the movie? I know for a fact that in the book Harry mends it with the elder wand?

I need answers!!!! Thank you.

Shocking news -- the film is 99% likely going to get an R rating for gruesome violence, disturbing images, and nudity. And to make matters worse, restricted ratings are spreading across more of the global world. Anyways, can anyone help me send a Howler to the MPAA, ''please? FirePuppy 16:39, June 1, 2011 (UTC)''

Have the MPAA stated that they are likely to rate it R, or are you just speculating this based on the book. I heard that they were cutting the nudity out of the limbo scene, and they usually try to avoid making the violence so gruesome and disturbing that it is rated R. In the last movie, they cut out the scene where Wormtail strangles himself, just to bring the rating down to PG13. It probably won't be rated R, and even if it is, it isn't a big deal. If you're over 17, you won't have a problem getting in, and if you're under 17, just bring a parent or other adult with you. Also, I hate to break it to you, but howlers aren't real. This is due to the fact that magic doesn't exist. Even if they were real, you might get into legal difficulties with sending exploding mail, and I doubt that the MPAA will change a film's rating based on a threatening letter.Icecreamdif 02:26, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I am about 5-6 months away from my 21st birthday, but even when I'm over 21, they're still gonna ask me for my identification. FirePuppy 19:49, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Then just show them your identification. Are you just assuming that it is going to be R based on the book, or has the MPAA indicated that it may be R. Since the movie is targeted at least partially at children, the movie will almost certainly go for a PG-13 rating.Icecreamdif 21:59, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Ooh, now it looks like this film is the earliest to still be not yet rated, and the movie's due in like, 5 weeks! The other two films scheduled for release on July 15 already have MPAA ratings, but this film still does not. What's happening? FirePuppy 10:11, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Cast list
What actually is the use of naming all the extras in the cast list? I would suggest removing all of them, to maintain those who play identified and named characters. And on a side note, why are wedding guests and ministry workers even on the list?..given the fact that they're only in part 1 anyway.

what do you think the deathly hallows is going to be like?
Well....suggestions? I think its going to be AWESOME! Speedysnitch 13:36, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Changes in Differences from the book
In the recent TV Spot of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 shows us that when harry arrives at hogwarts and enter the great hall to encounter Snape he is with the Order of the Phoneix.

...I went too far
This is a follow-up to the topic "Maybe..."

It appears I went too far, as the movie finally gets a PG-13 rating for the same reason Part 1 also did. Forgive me for all of what I said. FirePuppy 17:10, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Did you honestly think they would give a Harry Potter film a R rating? That is very dumb to be honest. There are so many kids that like it and if it was R they couldn't get in to see it. They would be upset. They take that sort of thing into consideration. Thats why they cut the "Saw-like scene" from Part 1 to avoid that kind of rating. There really isn't a reason for it to be considered for R. Theres nothing R worthy in it in my opinion and I'm 19 and I've never seen an R rated movie in my life. Gryffindor1991 18:40, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

I told you it wouldn't be rated R. I still think that they should have let part 1 be rated R if it meant that they could keep Wormtail's death in it, but they don't want to lose their child audience.Icecreamdif 00:41, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Running time
I'm sorry for asking, but how is it we know what the running time is? --http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110515011517/pirates/images/thumb/4/4f/CJSFan_Sig.png/75px-CJSFan_Sig.pngBlack Pearl, HMS Interceptor, Queen Anne's Revenge 02:39, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

It was confirmed by the British Board of Film Classification. And, when I first heard that it would be the shortest Potter movie, I was a more than a little disappointed. But, the people who saw the test screening say that it was a very satisfying length, and it didn't feel too short in any way. Take into consideration that Part 1 covered roughly 500 pages of the book, so there's only about 300 pages left. Not alot to put into a movie. Im super stoked!!!! Hope that helped. Drummerwiz92 03:36, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! I'm glad to know that this one has a considerable length. I knew that it was going to be at least 2 hours(as it was said by one of the producers), but 2 hours 10 min is great(including credits, I believe). To me, it's the same as with the new POTC film...just as long as it's at least 2 hours, I'm ok. Because with films like this, I can't stand it being shorter than that. http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110515011517/pirates/images/thumb/4/4f/CJSFan_Sig.png/75px-CJSFan_Sig.pngBlack Pearl, HMS Interceptor, Queen Anne's Revenge 03:59, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

The disintigrating shiled spell in the movie may be the unspecified spell created by Flitwick. He says: "Protego Horribilis" This may be that spell. So technically that won't be a difference in the book.

Parvati Patil?
hey, I just want to ask. is parvati patil in this film? i mean, her role as trelawney aid was given to padma patil. is she in the sceening test? and i don't remember seeing her on the part 1 either. *sorry, if theres any mistakes on my writing*

I AM DYING TO KNOW!

Ok...so I've seen every possible scene and clip from the trailers and the GRAND STAIRCASE seem to have changed. Cna someone tell me the new architectual design? PLEASE?! I don't get it at all. I am guessing that once you go through the Entrance Hall the large steps to the right seem to have turned into a large hallway filled with huge staircases that then lead to this three way stairs. One going down straight ahead, then two on each side of the one going down but instead the two are going up (I saw this in a featurette or something where the students are marching in while Alecto watches them go downstairs) Does this mean that the Grand Staircases have COMPLETELY CHANGED?! I would be so mad if they don't look similar to the orginal. Being an EXTREME HARRY POTTER FAN I need the STAIRS! I will now cry in a corner. :( But can some one please reply and tell tme the new design or something worth while? PLEASE?

The Grand Staircase New Design?!?!?!?!?!
I AM DYING TO KNOW!

Ok...so I've seen every possible scene and clip from the trailers and the GRAND STAIRCASE seem to have changed. Cna someone tell me the new architectual design? PLEASE?! I don't get it at all. I am guessing that once you go through the Entrance Hall the large steps to the right seem to have turned into a large hallway filled with huge staircases that then lead to this three way stairs. One going down straight ahead, then two on each side of the one going down but instead the two are going up (I saw this in a featurette or something where the students are marching in while Alecto watches them go downstairs) Does this mean that the Grand Staircases have COMPLETELY CHANGED?! I would be so mad if they don't look similar to the orginal. Being an EXTREME HARRY POTTER FAN I need the STAIRS! I will now cry in a corner. :( But can some one please reply and tell tme the new design or something worth while? PLEASE?

OOOPS! Forgot to put a headline titleREPOSTING! :D

Oliver Wood
'''Oliver Wood cut from the film? Since it does not appear in the actors on the sites of cinema in the film the Deathly Hallows: Part 2. Even on IMDB it in the actors do not.'''