User talk:SuperSajuuk

Merge
It seems like you've proposed a merge of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (PC, Mac) to Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (video game). Perhaps you are not aware of the fact there are completely different versions of each videogame for each platform. They're produced and distributed by different companies at different times. They're not the same at all. Besides the summary above them all (which is the game page), users have created articles for those specific versions. We can do this since we're meant for it, differently from Wikipedia with its notability policies. - Esbonl (talk) 00:46, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * I've replied to your comment in the the merge discussion. - Esbonl (talk) 12:44, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Wiki maintenance
Hello! I can't think of any specific tasks at the moment, just general maintenence (fixing typos, mistakes, formatting, etc.) -- though those things you suggested would be a good place to start. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:10, January 30, 2016 (UTC)


 * I guess there isn't anything that forbids using tools like that, although it did slip my mind about user rights. I suggest you put up a Content Moderator nomination at Harry Potter Wiki:Requests for permissions.
 * About files; the usual rule of thumb around here has been to keep unused files if potentially relevant and decent-quality (i.e. to keep a library of "usable" images for articles), and delete if non-free and unused if otherwise (e.g. user images unrelated to Harry Potter, etc.). That isn't to say that some of the latter don't fall through the cracks.
 * As to the issue of inactive rollback users, I don't think we've ever removed rights from inactive users (e.g., see Harry Potter Wiki:Administrators), we just label them as inactive, in case they do want to start editing again. Though you'd better leave your suggestion on the forum (it wouldn't be up to me, solely, to decide about that anyways). --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 18:30, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Permissions
Sorry, I'm no longer regular around here, only making the occasional edit. I don't feel qualified at this time to weigh in on such discussions. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:44, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Umbridge
Talk page. See it. Read it. Now. That is all. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 11:48, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't have needed to demand if you hadn't started the war by reverting the stuff I added in. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 13:32, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * One prior editor undid what I'd wrote, yes, but they only undid it once; you've undone it more than once -- making you the sole reason to blame. The information I added has to be correct based on canon information anyway. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 13:38, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah; that person undid it but they didn't know the source of where I'd got the information -- when I added that they didn't undo it. Seth is an admin -- they can undo and redo what they like. You, however, are not. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 14:06, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * Do not that the edit war didn't start until you reverted; the other reverter stopped once I explained my sources. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 14:18, February 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * I only reverted it once, but I did suggest that an admin investigated the situation, which is what happened. They explained where you went wrong. I didn't stop because I believed that your sources were correct. I stopped because edit warring wasn't helping. But when an admin undid your edit, I was not in the least bit surprised. ―  C.Syde  ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 18:30, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

RE:ArchiveTool
Hello! I'm not at all familiar with ArchiveTool, so I'm sorry but I wouldn't know what to say. We've been archiving talk pages manually when they become far too long but that's pretty much it (see Talk:Tom Riddle). (And thanks for the suggestion -- I've been putting off archiving my talk page for a long time!)

As for redlinks, I'd ask you to exercise discretion. Redlinks are actually useful tools to detect articles we need to create, so unless they're obvious mistakes (i.e. mispellings, articles that have already been deleted, etc. -- which I understand the ones in my talk page were, anyways) they're actually best to be left as is. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 19:09, February 15, 2016 (UTC)

Wizarding World
Say how good is your information on the Wizarding World and i don't mean the Harry Potter universe i mean the theme area at Universal parks? 18:04, February 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * But what about from watching the videos? 18:11, February 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Really but what about the food and drinks there like Butterbeer, Chocolate frogs and Every flavor beans? 18:15, February 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * They serve food from the Harry Potter Universe in the park. 18:57, February 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah sorry about that. 19:00, February 16, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Link edits
For the most part, I don't mind the piped links, sans the redundant ones, but that's just me. If you want to just use the redirects, knock yourself out; be bold! But also, be careful; sometimes piping is necessary. I noticed one of your edits to the Ginny Weasley article removed the link directing to Arthur Weasley while describing their relationship as parent and child; "Arthur" by itself directs to King Arthur, which is obviously wrong in that context, so the pipe is needed. But other than that, I say go for broke. -- Cubs Fan (Talk to me)  00:49, February 26, 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, as an afterthought, piping usually helps in preventing links to disambiguation pages (e.g. pages with similar or the same name). As an example, simply linking to "James Potter" doesn't accomplish much, because it can refer to Harry's father, Harry's son, or the fanon short story. -- Cubs Fan (Talk to me)  00:54, February 26, 2016 (UTC)

re
Awwww thanks for noticing <3 I've been meaning to since a lot of information's come out, the last couple of years I just sorta pop around randomly or if I notice vandals, so many wiki's, so little time xD but this'll always be my main wiki even if I don't have a lot of time to edit every day. :) 17:49 3/4/2016 (UTC)
 * Responded :) hope that helped, if you ever need anything I am around, even if I'm not editing <3 19:18 3/4/2016 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you brought it up though, it's something that's bugged me for a long time, I mean crashing/slow loading aside, the amount of scrolling you have to do to look at like the Harry Potter article is insane xD 20:30 3/4/2016 (UTC)

Oh, you have been granted rights? Congratulations!

ArrestoMomentum &#124;  talk  18:29, March 6, 2016 (UTC)

Quotes
Why did you remove the quotes that went along with his individual relationships?Misskatniss1546 (talk) 12:54, March 8, 2016 (UTC)Misskatniss1546


 * Some of the relationship articles on other wikies have one quote pertaining to each individual, would that be fine? Instead of a numerous amount, just one.Misskatniss1546 (talk) 13:11, March 8, 2016 (UTC)Misskatniss1546


 * I have the quotes and what if it's a quote from the author? I haven't added any. Misskatniss1546 (talk) 13:36, March 8, 2016 (UTC)Misskatniss1546


 * Okay thanksMisskatniss1546 (talk) 13:43, March 8, 2016 (UTC)misskatniss1546

FYI What I put on the TALK page WAS NOT theory - it was fact and if you read the book you'll know what I mean! IDIOT