User talk:Jayce Carver

Greyback image
Because, as far as I understand it, the image in question is not a promotional headshot, but a make-up test shot. Therefore it is out of universe, and should not be the main infobox image, as the make-up in question may not reflect the actual make-up of the character in the film. I have no arguments about using it in the article in a behind the scenes section, however. If it is a promotional headshot, however, and it is proved to be the final make-up look of the character, then its position as an infobox image is valid. Hope that answers your question. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 16:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Might be a good idea to ask - I took a quick buzz around a few fan sites but might have missed it. It looks genuine enough, which is the reason it hasn't been deleted yet, and the same user uploaded a new body shot of Narcissa Malfoy as well. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 16:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi,. It has been determined that you are a trusted member of this community and that we benefit from your contributions. Upon request or through my own discretion, I have granted you rollback privileges. This tool can be used to quickly revert vandalism and maintain the quality of this wiki. Please remember to use this tool with discretion and never in a content dispute. You should now see a "rollback" link when viewing a user's contributions. Thanks, and happy editing. John Reaves (talk) 21:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Infobox improvements
Actually I did notice your thread, and I have been thinking about how to respond. I think you are right in that the infoboxes could be set up a little better, and the appearance of it needs to be tweaked. I don't, however, think we need to cut back on the amount of infoboxes we have. Your point makes sense about Durmstrang and Beauxbatons, but we really need separate house and character infoboxes.-- 17:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The shades of gray would be a big improvement if we could somehow implement it. I've been looking at the source code, and most of the styling is housed in either separate templates or Common.css, which makes it difficult copy over; you have to manually check each template used for the needed code. I'm gonna see how much of it I can sort out.-- 17:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I have it...though the rb template isn't working, so the corners on the bottom aren't round. See here for a test.-- 18:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. I think that that would be more of a "nickname" than an alias.-- 18:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Template
That's a good idea. We often "borrow" a lot of things from Wookieepedia. But, the thing is, Bellatrix raiding the Burrow is not considered canon. A whole raid definately would have been mentioned in the book, and therefore never happened. The books take precedence over the movies. The template would work, or a mention in the "behind the scenes" section. I personally think that those templates detract from the article visually, but either way works. 14:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds good! 15:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The way of the appearances does look pretty cool. You might want to start a thread about it at the Wizengamot forum. 16:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Images
Nice job on the images! Just a word of caution, however. Sometimes changing the main infobox image without consultation results in annoying some users. Hopefully, since your images are good-quality improvements, there will be no grumbling about them. Keep up the good work. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 15:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Deletion request
All done. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 14:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Some nice looking images. Just makes me more annoyed they pushed back the release date >( - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 14:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: What's best
Usually, I would go with the promo shot over the movie still, even if its a full body one. What are the chances of simply extracting a head shot from the body shot that would be good enough to be used as a main image? - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 11:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Judging by that image, I would keep the main infobox image as it is. I like the image, and it would work as a main image, but there appears to be too much artifact distortion around the face for one thing. As an image in the article, it would be fine. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 11:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Sig
Could you shrink the banner in your sig? It creates a large space between your comments and all the others.-- 20:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)