Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations/First year (second nomination)

{{archive
 * result=Not Promoted
 * sig=-- DarkJedi613 {{sup|(Talk)}} 15:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * discussion=

First Year (3 votes for, 2 against)
}}
 * Support: Added quotes, cleaned up, added images, and new sections --- H e l l a b o r e (Send me an Owl )(cont ribs)
 * Support: Great article, but it focuses a little too much on Harry, Ron, and Hermione, and not the subject of first years. But that's my only complaint.- Aragog the Acromantula(Talk / Contributions) 19:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support: ÈnRîcö Ravenclawcrest.jpg(Send me an Owl ) 15:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Provisional Oppose: It has a lot of potential, but, as mentioned above, it focuses more on Harry than on first-years in general. Also, the events of Harry's first year are described in present tense. There are also a fair amount of grammatical errors, excessive linking, and no references. It isn't ready for featured status at present. O r <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>e <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000FF>a <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>d <font face="Times" color=#800080>(talk) 14:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose: None of the problems I mentioned above have been fixed, and the intro is much too short. <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>O <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000FF>r <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>e <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000FF>a <font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>d <font face="Times" color=#800080>(talk) 18:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Poorly written, not sourced. The entire section Harry's first year should not exist, except for maybe a paragraph or two of info, as it belongs in his article. Without this section, there really is nothing to merit anything close to an FA.-- 00:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)