User talk:Hcoknhoj/Archive 2

New Talk Page
Starts Here. --JKoch (Owl Me! ) 23:02, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Archive Template

 * Do you want me to help you get the archive template properly on this?-- L.V.K.T.V.J. Hogwarts.jpg( Send an owl! ) 23:08, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Warning
Well, considering: It was most likely just "hit-and-run" vandalism, and I doubt we'll even see anything from this person again. Personally, I usually save Vandal2 until either they continue to vandalize after getting the Vandal1 warning, or if their edit was especially vulgar, profane, or disruptive. - Nick O'Demus 00:17, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It's an unregistered IP
 * 2) It's their first and only edit
 * 3) It was relatively minor


 * Well, I'll admit these are just my personal guidelines. You don't have to apologize for having a different point of view. - Nick O'Demus 00:21, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Prefect
Thanks Hcoknhoj. -- GrouchMan (Send an owl then scram!! ) 01:03, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Vote
That vote on the Talk:Hermione Granger page has gotten really close, huh? :P-- L.V.K.T.V.J. ( Send an owl! ) 00:57, March 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I am sure that others will agree with the new image Seth has uploaded and switch around their vote. If the picture gets over 6, I will eliminate the one with less votes, as we can't eliminate the other image, as it wouldn't be fair, as Seth just put on the image a few minutes ago.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. Hogwarts.jpg( Send an owl! ) 20:00, March 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * If you change your vote others may follow. And we will finally be able to end this vote. –K.A.J•T•C•E• 20:00, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Private Lessons
I guess so. -- GrouchMan (Send an owl then scram!! ) 03:36, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Private Lessons
The original article needs to be moved back, not just copy-and-paste the text, or it will lose the page history. I'll ask an admin to fix it back to the way it was. - Nick O'Demus 03:41, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Bingo. - Nick O'Demus 03:43, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * "Bingo"? -- GrouchMan (Send an owl then scram!! ) 03:49, March 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Grunny fixed it. - Nick O'Demus 07:40, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Chief Snatcher
Kind of iffy. The source reference does have it capitalized as a proper title, but it also says "Chief Snatcher Picture Double", so it's not enough to tell if that will be the character's actual credited name in the film or not. We probably need to find a better reference. I'll go ahead and give it the conjecture tag for now, as the reference it's based on isn't official. - Nick O'Demus 04:07, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Long-term Project
I was going to do Mafalda Hopkirk after Griselda Marchbanks, but you can have a go at it. It's just too brief and sourceless. Not so "long-term", though... --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 02:50, March 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's great! -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 12:54, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
Hi Hcoknhoj. Not to nag or anything, but you mustn’t remove peoples comments from talk-pages, as you did with Sirius Black. I know anons are not allowed to vote, but they may still voice thier opinions. Thanks. <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#406B2E">J <font face="Microsoft Sans Serif"><font color="#8DB87A">a <font color="#406B2E">y <font color="#8DB87A">c <font color="#406B2E">e  <font face="Arial" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:8;">Darkmark.png•<font color="#406B2E">Avada Kedavra •<font color="#8DB87A">Crucio •<font color="#406B2E">Imperio • 08:49, March 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, guys. I did it by accident. I must have went back too far on the "backspace" key. As you can see in the history I put "Unsigned" on their comment. My bad.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. Hogwarts.jpg( Send an owl! ) 21:19, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * My bad too. Sorry Hcoknhoj. <font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#406B2E">J <font face="Microsoft Sans Serif"><font color="#8DB87A">a <font color="#406B2E">y <font color="#8DB87A">c <font color="#406B2E">e  <font face="Arial" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:8;">Darkmark.png•<font color="#406B2E">Avada Kedavra •<font color="#8DB87A">Crucio •<font color="#406B2E">Imperio • 22:31, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Magical genetics
> Sorry for eavesdropping, but you seem to have put considerable thought into this issue. The population part is a very compelling argument. I going to take a leap and say that you have a biology background. --JKoch<sup sizcache="0" sizset="39">(Owl Me!) 13:26, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Guilty as charged - I'm a biologist by training, even though not by career.

Considering that wikis are collaborative projects, I would say that eavesdropping is no crime.

Ngebendi 15:01, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Ginevra weasley's children
OK - must have muffed it again. Reason why?

By the way, OOU means?

Many thanks! Ngebendi 18:26, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Magorian
Actually, the main image was concept artwork for the fifth film, so technically, it is not fan art.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. ( Send an owl! ) 02:18, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Crookshanks edits.
Certainly.

Whoever wrote that sentence clearly dropped a word, and it was impossible to me to find out which. Someone more skilled in wikis than I am might have found out the author and pointed it out to him, but it is too early for me to know how to do it. This way, I felt that the faulty passage would get a faster resolution than otherwise, and this is what happened.

My apologies.

Ngebendi 05:56, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Editing help.
can you please read this page because i think it needs an edit but im not sure about a bit in it, Ouagadougou.

Molly Wobbles 08:03, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Magorian
No. It's concept art for the 5th film. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 14:50, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Slughorn
Please read HP&HBP p. 470 (UK edition) :) --Thorning 20:34, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Number of horcruxes.
John, before this one-upmanship with Thorning about the number of Voldemort's horcruxes escalates in an edit war, or whatever, I wanted to ask you. If it looks like a horcrux and behaves like a horcrux and has to be destroyed before Voldemort can be killed, what is it if not a horcrux?

Note seven of the horcrux page on this wikia states that Harry does not count as the horcrux-making process has not been used, but it looks highly suspicious to me. First, the soul fragment within Harry had to be killed before Voldemort could be, and I suspect that it is the killing of the soul fragments to be important rather than the destruction of the horcruxes. Second, a murder has been done (or more likely, at least two, since both James Potter and Lily Evans got killed withing minutes from each other). Third, at the time of the killing of Harry's parents', Voldemort's soul has already been split five times (since there are five horcrux), presumably using the same wand. It is not inconceivable that after repeating the process so many times, in the conditions present on that event, the wand (or Voldemort's subconscious mind) automatically activated the spells for making the horcruxes. after the Avada Kedavra spell that killed (presumably) Lily Evans.

I get the feeling that Thorning is right.

BTW, I noticed Thorning's post after I wrote this.

Ngebendi 21:43, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Apologies.
Sorry, John, for using the wrong term. Having seen what seemed to be a series of reciprocal "undo"es performed within minutes, I used the term "edit war" for want of a better definition, and felt compelled to step in with my opinion.

Guess I will get the knack of things here pretty soon, and in the meanwhile I'll bang my head in a few walls. Please, bear with me.

Ngebendi 23:59, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Mafalda Hopkirk
Well, as little information we know about her, it looks great. Speaking of cleaning up articles, can you help me work on Albus Dumbledore's Pensieve? It only has information about what happened in Half-Blood Prince and Deathly Hallows, so we need information about it from Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. ( Send an owl! ) 01:46, March 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I will start a 1997 subsection right now, so you can work off of what I did. If we don't edit the same thing, then it will not matter. That is what I found out while we were editing at the same time.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. Hogwarts.jpg( Send an owl! ) 02:41, March 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I was about to do that, I was working on that (I am on a tab right now). But I am working on 1997, so you can change it to 1998.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. Hogwarts.jpg( Send an owl! ) 02:49, March 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well looks like you have alot on your plate ;). Okay, I will keep working on the article. You can make other edits later.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. Hogwarts.jpg( Send an owl! ) 02:57, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Ouagadouga
"the furthest most [sic] point in Siberia," whats the [sic] thing?

Minerva McGonagall duel(l)ed
Was going to tell you that "dueled" can be spelled with a one or two "l"s - but looks like you already know that.

Just hope I'll be able to get used to the quibbling over spelling - english is not my mother tongue.

Ngebendi 07:39, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Attack
completely accidental... sorry about that --Emmafofemma 18:51, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RE:AD's Pensieve
Great job! It is really referenced now.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. ( Send an owl! ) 20:18, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

OK
Ok, I had just seen some characters, such as Harry, Ron and Hermione, in the present tense. However, now I can see they're fixed. Thanks! User:Quirinus Quirrell

RE:Attack on Arthur Weasley
Okay.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. ( Send an owl! ) 21:13, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to leave currently right now, so I will be adding ore references later.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. Hogwarts.jpg( Send an owl! ) 21:26, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

✅.-- L.V.K.T.V.J. ( Send an owl! ) 02:10, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Order of Merlin
- Congratulations --Thorning 10:47, March 17, 2010 (UTC)