Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 11

Please discuss candidates for deletion here

Archived discussions
Lists of archived discussions and their results. Sorted by year in which the discussion started.
 * Archive 1
 * Archive 2
 * Archive 3
 * Archive 4
 * Archive 5
 * Johnpaul Castrianni
 * Tsunami
 * Unidentified lethal curse

Studying girls
Studying girls has been a candidate for deletion for over a month. Any input on whether it should be deleted or not? -- Texthawm (Owl Me) 23:16, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

{{archive
 * result=Deleted
 * sig=-- Matoro 183 {{sup| (Talk) }} 21:09, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * discussion=

Katie Weasley for Deletion
The ' Katie Weasley' Page should be deleted. It is wrong in so many areas and is obviously someone making stuff up. }}

{{archive
 * result=Deleted
 * sig=-- Matoro 183 {{sup| (Talk) }} 21:09, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * discussion=

Caroline Ghostwhisper?
Caroline Ghostwhisper is an obvious candidate for deletion, as it has nothing but pictures that have nothing to do with Harry Pottter, nor does it have text. }}

{{archive
 * result=Deleted
 * sig=-- Matoro 183 {{sup| (Talk) }} 21:09, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * discussion=

Professor Trelawney's inner eye
Somebody put this up as a candidate for deletion but her inner eye is one of the most important things in the books. If she did not have it voldemort would have never died because of Snape Eve's dropping on the prediction. Then voldemort created his own enemy which of course is harry. }}

{{archive
 * result=Deleted
 * sig=-- Matoro 183 {{sup| (Talk) }} 21:09, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * discussion=

The later life of the potters and weasley's
I think this one should definitely be removed. Apart from terrible spelling, it is empty and really doesn't contribute to this wiki. Anyone agree? *Ginny* 02:43, April 12, 2011 (UTC) }}

Dobby's shoes
An absolutely bizarre and pointless article. All it says is that Dobby owned a pair of shoes after being freed by the Malfoy's. If this stays, then we'll be seeing articles like "Ron's wellington boots" and "Hermione's spare Hogwarts robes" appearing soon. 82.42.249.145 17:03, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

I disagree, I think articles should be made for clothing only if it's useful and the clothing is memorable in the film. By useful, I mean it explained to some who may not know about the difference they saw in Dobby's atire in Part 1. And if they look at Dobby's clothes, it's linked in case they want to know more about it. *Luna (I suspect Nargles are behind it... ) 18:02, May 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * No other character has an article for a non-significant piece of their clothing. Keeping this article would be like having one for Ron Weasley's robes or Hermione's coat. I agree that it is fairly pointless.-- Matoro 183 (Talk) 20:10, May 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Luna, you say it is linked in case they want to know more about it. That would be fair enough, but the article doesn't give any more information about it. It just says he owned a pair of shoes. That's it. 82.42.249.145 19:52, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

{{archive
 * result=Deleted
 * sig=-- Matoro 183 (Talk) 21:09, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * discussion=

WTF and My feetsies are stuck
I discovered these pages: WTF and My feetsies got stuck.

There is no point to any of these pages, as they are nonsense and pose heavy vandalism to this wiki. They also really have nothing to do with Harry Potter.

I will continue to find more examples of vandalism and post it here for deletion.

I agree with this. That page is only vandalism. }}

{{Archive
 * result=Deleted
 * sig=Nick O'Demus 09:11, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * discussion=

Jay Barrymore
It's about Emma Watson's ex-boyfriend. }}

Tom Riddle's memory/piece of Voldemort's soul from the diary.

Well of course, I created it, but it shouldn't be deleted because:

The soul fragment is not Lord Voldemort and cannot be put in his article. The soul fragment was the main antagonist of the Chamber of Secrets and needs to have his own article. I've only just joined the Harry Potter wiki. This is my first wiki, and I'm still working on it. Please edit it to make it better!

Harry Potter will never end
I agree with the contents, but the page is not suitable on the HPWiki --ƃuıuɹoɥʇ (Send me an owl ) 08:33, July 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Personally it is a unnecessary page that is irrelevant to the main standards of the variety of different pages. Seriously if anyone wishes to express their wishes on this then make this into a blog post. -Adv193 08:52, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Christian Simpson as Old Fred Weasley
I don't know if this source is good enough. It's your decision. source: http://scificonventionsigners.weebly.com/christian-j-simpson.html Harry granger 18:34, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

Tav (disambiguation)
I do not put the delete tag, but I want to know is the Tav (disambiguation) page is really useful, cause there's no disambiguation at all: it leads only towards a single page Tav MacDougall. -- 12:12, August 6, 2011 (UTC)

Warner
I do not put the delete tag, but I want to know is these pages are really useful because they are not HP related. -- 12:12, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Harry Warner
 * Albert Warner
 * Jack Warner
 * Sam Warner

Parents
Parents is a redirection towards Mary Cattermole's father. No useful and more difficult to find with the search engine the real pages of parents. -- 12:38, August 6, 2011 (UTC)

Tom Riddle's cloak spell
I did not make this page, but I personally do not think it should be deleted. I don't know where anyone got the idea that this is fanon, if anyone's seen the movie, they can see Voldemort's robes casting out and trying to strangle Harry. And the fact that this is non-canon, I don't think, makes it a legitimate reason to delete it. There are numerous other non-canon pages, such as "Petrifying curse", "Disintegrating curse", and "Fianto Duri". Why, the second one even had a template saying it was a non-canonical appearance! And I used the first two examples because we see the whole duel between Molly and Bellatrix, and they obviously did not appear. What I think could improve this particular page is possibly a name-change, and more information. But that's just me. --AlastorMoody 05:06, August 12, 2011 (UTC)