User talk:DarkJedi613/1

Sadly.... Syugecin
 * Thanks for the help anyways.

Hello
I was wondering if you'd be willing to chat. Syugecin
 * Sure, what's going on? -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 18:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't look at other people's talk pages after a message, I'm glad you caught on. Could you kinda give me an idea of the editing style used here? I come from here so my style is different. I hope it doesn't bother you. Thanks. Syugecin
 * I'm not sure there is a particular style - the policy here doesn't seem to be incredibly extensive. I was actually going to talk to one of the administrators about it...is there anything in particular you were wondering about when you ask "style"? -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 21:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * D'ya think there's a problem with me deleting the Phoenix pictures and making Luna a disambig? Syugecin
 * Not at all. That same IP did a similar thing with all Death Eaters yesterday, I didn't get around to editing each one out though. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 21:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It's kind of pointless as the Category does that already. Well. I'll get around to doing the Death Eaters later. Thanks for the help and reassurance. Syugecin
 * I agree. Plus he's doing it manually, not even using a template. Waste of time. Good luck. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 21:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Templates
Hey, DarkJedi613. Nice work on the templates and infoboxes. Just wondering if you had any plans to make something like an In Use template or Clean-up template a la Wookieepedia? An In Use template would be useful to me during rewrites.

Also, re Syugecin's comments on editing style above - I'm editing in the Wookiee style myself 'cos its been banged into me :). If you were going to the admins with an idea for a "manual of style" then I'd be interested in helping. - Cavalier One 21:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the in use template. And no problem editing my parchment page!  I caught a couple of the name switches, but didn't get them all I guess.  I've been editing to the Wookiee style, too, mainly 'cos I've gotten used to it.  But we should definitely propose a manual of style for this wiki and get uniformility on the articles. - Cavalier One 06:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Fred and George
Could you help? I hope those look right. Syugecin
 * I'm not sure if they can be considered Order members. But they we're allowed at certain talks. I'd leave it as is for now. But be my guest to do so if you see fit. Syugecin

Layout guide
Looks good to me, very comprehensive. The only suggestion I have is changing the appearances layout to the one I used in the Ginny Weasley article that separates the various mediums into subsections (book, film, game, etc), mainly because I think it looks neater. But otherwise, I think that it's a great piece of work, regardless of whether or not you take my suggestion on board. Kudos! I very much hope it is accepted. - Cavalier One 22:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I see where you're going on the chronological issue. Maybe just a list then, without the subsections, since I feel that indent bulleting the films and games looks untidy.  Precedent should be book-film-game?  In response to Syugecin's comment on relationships, though, I feel that is a needed section to further explore the complex relationships between certain characters, especially the main ones, and to cover the complexities of any romantic relationships.  Again, see my rewrite on the Ginny Weasley article - a lot of the info there wouldn't work in any of the main sections. - Cavalier One 16:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Style
Wow. I didn't realize I could give that opinion. The only difference I see needed is that the relationships thing is unnecessary. We could just write that in the life sections. ^_^ Syugecin