Forum:Wands guidelines

Does anyone else think it might be a good idea to introduce some guidelines in regards to articles on wands? Specifically, wheter or not an individuals wand is notable enough to have it's own article? 11 new articles on wands have been created in the past 24 hours alone. All written by the same user, and all completely identical except for the name of the wand's owner. None of these articles even provide the reader with any information, other than to state the obvious fact that "this was the wand of so and so". I really think we should nip this in the bud, before wands become the new "unidentified individual". Jayden Matthews 14:43, August 29, 2011 (UTC)