User talk:Belac Reteet

Category:Half-breeds
A half-breed is the child of a human and another, non-human creature. Neither Animagi, werewolves, centaurs, nor any of the other things you added that category to are that, so they aren't half-breeds. But thanks for trying to help with our categorization, regardless. -- 1337star (Drop me a line!) 05:21, January 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I have to agree; Sirius is clearly stated to be "Pure-blood", just as McGonagall is shown on Pottermore to be half-blood. -- Hunnie Bunn (talk ) 22:32, January 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Continuing to edit in a certain manner after you have been asked to stop is vandalism. Regarding Remus Lupin-- the term is used a racial slur, not as a technical term. And I don't see how you could ever try to claim that Rita Skeeter or Sirius Black are half-breeds. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:34, January 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * You seem to be under the impression that the term "half-breed" encompasses anyone who is considered an Animagus. I don't know where you got this interpretation, but this is not considered to be such, nor has it ever been. Animagi aren't mentioned anywhere on our page regarding Half-breeds, nor has the term ever been used in association with them within the books. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:38, January 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, that's fine and all, but you kept adding it to pages gung-ho after two people had already asked you to stop. In any case, we don't even know for a fact that Animagi do have animal DNA. We go by what is said in the series, and on canon based on how the terms are normally used within the franchise and within the Wizarding world. And neither "half-breed" nor "part-human" has ever been used in association with Animagi. You may want to have a look at our Canon policies. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:54, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Okay
Hey, no worries. There's actually plenty to do around here once you know your way around, it's just a matter of familiarising yourself with the wiki and how things are structured. There are many articles that can use cleanup, or are stubs, and a number of projects that could use attention, but not everybody has time to get to. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:16, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * LOL. You don't have to keep telling me "I'm Belac Reeteet" in every one of your messages, I can see that in your signature. ProfessorTofty (talk) 03:09, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Category additions
Okay, here we go again. The category "Creatures" should not have been added to Vampire, as Vampires is a subcategory of Creatures and so we do not add both categories to a page. And the "Creature" category shouldn't exist at all. At this time, I am going to ask that you stop adding any additional categories to pages unless you are willing to familiarise yourself with our category structure. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:09, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * You can add those categories to it, but no individuals, because they are already listed under the subcategories. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:16, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * It sounds good. And one other thing, please don't start a new section every time you leave a reply, it just clutters up space. Just reply within the same section unless you're starting an entirely new topic. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:22, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I am sorry, but a Horcrux is not a Being, nor is it any way a form of Undead. I do not want to do this, but you are not leaving me much choice. The next time you add inappropriate categories, you will be temporarily blocked from editing. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:07, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Horcruxes are not sentient, I don't know where you get this idea. And breaks are cut if behaviour is modified, but immediately after being warned about adding problematic categories, your next edit was immediately adding more categories. I would suggest just stopping with categories for a while and find something else to edit on the wiki. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:21, January 20, 2013 (UTC)