User talk:Danniesen

Articles
While creating articles, you should add categories to the pages. just to let you know. --Station7 18:32, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Image uploads
-- Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 08:31, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please read and comply with the above message. Failure to properly source and license images may lead to administrative action. Thank you for your cooperation. - Cavalier One Gryffindorcrest.jpg( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 09:11, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is your final warning. Comply with the image policy, or face a cooldown block. - Cavalier One Gryffindorcrest.jpg( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 08:22, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Semiprotection
Adding the   template to your userpage does not grant it semiprotected status. If you would like your userpage to be semiprotected, you need to ask an Administrator to do it. (Although the template should still not be used on userpages, even if they are protected.) - Nick O'Demus 07:46, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Counter-spell
So, I saw you made Counter-spell a candidate for deletion and I was wondering why. If anything, I would've thought that the separate articles for counter-jinx, charm, -hex & etc. would;ve been better candidates, since their content could be added to the Counter-spell page, alowing all the info to be collated into one neat area.Green Zubat 20:38, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

Bagman in GoF?
Hello. I have noticed you have written in the "Ludovic Bagman" article that the character makes an appearance in the Goblet of Fire film. Can you provide a source? Thank you. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 21:15, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

I can't. I just thought that if he was seen sitting next to Bartemius Crouch Sr., then he was not cut from the film. --Danniesen

Verify tags
Please stop adding "Verify" tags to articles that are most obviously not fanon and that are properly sourced (i.e. Vampire). Thank you. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 20:38, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

Hi Dannisen. A few things. Users are not permited to remove the contents of their talk pages, so please do not do so again. In the future, when tagging articles for deletion, please do not blank the page. Just add the deletion tag to the top. An administrator needs to see what the article contains, so that they can make an informed decision on whether or not to delete it. Also, profanity is not allowed here. Please keep your language clean in the future. Thank you. Jayden Matthews 12:20, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean: keep your language clean in the future.??? --Danniesen


 * He means to try and avoid using obscene, rude or abusive language here. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 16:53, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

New articles.
Danniesen, please don't create any more articles on unidentified, or anonymous individuals. There is currently a discussion in progress to decide whether or not to have such articles on the site at all. Also when creating new pages please make sure to format them correctly, adding sources and appearances. Jayden Matthews 16:37, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

I know it, i just forgot to add sources. --Danniesen

Sorry, dude, but you're seriously starting to get on my nerves. You've just created two new articles that you knew already existed because you directly copied and pasted the content from the original pages. This behaviour has to stop. Jayden Matthews 12:03, July 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Please stop. You have glaringly undid my edits to Unidentified Slug Club Christmas party attendee without even explaining on the edit summary. Be more careful next time you edit articles. Also, Jayden has a point, the two articles you've created were somewhat pointless. Please, do be attentive to potential harm in the quality of the wiki. Thank you. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 14:10, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Creating articles
When creating articles, do note that quality is preferrable over quantity. Your recent article, Skirmish at the Quad battlements is a copy of the Skirmish at the north battlements article, with parts removed and broken sentences and no actual new content except for the infobox. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 19:36, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Formatting articles
Please take your time, when creating articles, to properly format and categorise them. Thank you. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 21:04, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

Skirmish in a first-floor corridor
Stop redirecting "Skirmish in a first-floor corridor" to "Skirmish on a First Floor Corridor". As a conjectural title it shouldn't be capitalised. Besides, the only thing we know it that it was fought in a corridor on the first floor; not in the First Floor Corridor. Even if this was the case, copying articles' content to a new article is not the proper way to moving them under a new title. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:20, July 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * You have been blocked for a period of 4 days, as you have persistently engaged in counter-productive edit warring even after having been warned. I hope when you return you refrain from doing so. --  Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 15:29, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

If you haven't noticed it, i did only change the letters from small to big (example: first-floor corridor/First Floor Corridor). I haven't changed a to the. --Danniesen


 * Regardless, it's a conjectural title; it shouldn't be capitalised. You have repeatedly done so; edit warring is detrimental to the quality of the wiki. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 15:40, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

I have done nothing wrong. --Danniesen


 * You have. You have persistently, and repeatedly engaged in edit warring. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 15:57, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

I repeat: I have done nothing wrong. Since i only changed the small letters to BIG LETTERS. --Danniesen


 * I repeat once more: you have stubbornly engaged in edit warring. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 16:31, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

How can you blame me for simply changing small letters to big letters?? Making an article better than the previous version is not edit warring. --Danniesen


 * It is. As I've told you, given that it is a conjectural title, it mustn't be capitalised (save for proper nouns). I've repeatedly reverted your edit, and you have persistently changed it back. I even left a note in your talk page, but that didn't stop you from making the same thing again. That is, to all intents and purposes, edit warring. The block is final. It will expire on Tuesday, the 2nd of August. Once it expires, you can engage in editing articles once more and, hopefully, try not to make the same mistakes again. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 22:30, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

Changing username
<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color="FF8000">Nick O'Demus 13:27, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

Another Priori Incantatem
Please stop copying pages as you have been told many times before, quality over quantity! Please note that your latest article, Another Priori Incantatem has been catagorized as a canidate for deletion and an administrator has been alerted of your nonsense page. Thanks, <span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 204);">Head <span style="color: rgb(105, 105, 105);">of <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Ravenclaw <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">| <span _fck_bookmark="1" style="display: none;"> <span _fck_bookmark="1" style="display: none;"> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Send me an  Owl ! <span _fck_bookmark="1" style="display: none;"> 20:35, August 11, 2011 (UTC)

Only if you can give me the reasons for Priori Incantatem in the fifth and eight film and eight video game (others than David Yates wanting wands to connect (as I saw it, the reasons about Weasley's and Death Eaters' wands share same core and most powerful wizard were good)). And write these apearances into the Appearance-section of the article.

Again
Again, please stop creating articles on unidentified or anonymous individuals. They are not needed. Also, we will certainately not be creating articles on every single wand used by an extra, so please stop linking them in articles. Thank you. Jayden Matthews 14:23, August 12, 2011 (UTC)

Removing content
Please do not remove content from your talk page as it is to be preserved for the public record. You may transfer it to an archive if you wish, but it is not to be deleted. Warnings and the like stand, regardless of whether or not you try to erase them. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 14:35, August 12, 2011 (UTC)

Orange Potter and the Deathly Apple
Actually I would like it to stay like Potter Puppet Pals did. http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff258/truckthis/emoticons/themoticon-0159-music.gif Annoying  Orange  andUkulele ( Talk 15:00, August 20, 2011 (UTC)

It's not the same thing. Orange Potter and the Deathly Apple is not related to the Harry Potter series. Even the title goes wrong: Deathly Hallows and Deathly Apple, Deathly Hallows refers to three objects and Deathly Apple is the evil person. The title and page is not home at this Wiki. --Danniesen

Wikipedia
Please don't copy pages from Wikipedia. Thank you. Jayden Matthews 14:25, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Wands
Can you please cool it with the wands for a while? These articles are completely useless. you're just repeating the exact same thing over and over. Jayden Matthews 14:58, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, i also think i've made enough wands for a while. I've just finished making wands to all named playable wizardkind people in the DS/IPhone version of Lego HP Years 1-4. And not all pages have the same descriptions (e.g Stanley Shunpike's wand and Olympe Maxime's wand). --Danniesen 29 August 2011 19:14 (Denmark)

Administrator
Can i be an administrator myself? I mean, when someone makes articles that is nonsense, i can only place a Delete-tag. And sometimes when i'm doing that, another user deletes the page while i'm placing the tag. --Danniesen

Wikipedia, again
Again, please stop copying content from Wikipedia, it is considered plagerism, which is illegal. Jayden Matthews 14:41, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is your third and final warning. Stop plagiarizing content from Wikipedia, or I will report you. Jayden Matthews 13:09, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine. --Danniesen
 * You say that after doing it for a fourth time. I have no choice but to report you. Jayden Matthews 13:15, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I first got the message after i did it at the hog page. --Danniesen
 * That's not the point. You knew you were not supposed to do it, but you did so anyway. Taking someone else's work is, in edition to being immoral, illegal. You were fully aware of this when you did a second, third and fourth time so I see know reason whatsoever not to report you. Jayden Matthews 13:28, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Report me to what? --Danniesen
 * Wikipedia. They are owned by the same company that operates this, and every other wiki, and have the abillity to block people from editing their software. Which means that you would be unable to edit any wiki ever again. They are not likely to hand out this punishment to you, but it is a possibility for repeat offenders. Jayden Matthews 13:37, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, okay. I AM SORRY. I'll never do it ever again. I promise 100%. I will not copy the pages ever again, i am so sorry. Just not block me forever and i totally promise i will never do it again, i promise. --Danniesen
 * Because the work belongs to the editor who originally wrote it. An attribution tag can be added if needs be, but it makes us look bad if we just copy articles from Wikipedia. At any rate the articles you wrote were completely unncessary, as have been nearly all the articles that you've written since joining this site. Jayden Matthews 15:44, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's a hard thing to say. Many of my articles are good and necessary. --Danniesen

RE : Horrible english

 * I'm not agree with you Danniesen... I'm not a native english speaker too cause I'm french. Nobody forced you to use Google translate and introduce the text on the wiki: Google translate is a tool that anybody can use for his own comfort and there's no need to introduce later the text "Google translated" cause it's obvious that it's no a perfect language... Like we say in french "ça pique les yeux" -- 16:40, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

Delete tags
Please stop removing delete tags from articles. They are to be removed only after a consensus is reached. If you disagree with the article being deleted discuss it at Category talk:Candidates for deletion. You might think the subject is article worthy but apparently others do not if they put the delete tag on the article. This means the subject must be discussed so a community consensus can be reached. Keep it up and I will report you to the administrators. -Shorty1982 11:23, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

What part of "do not remove delete tags" do you not understand? You have been told many times, by both fellow editors and administrators, that Delete tags CANNOT be removed without discussion. IMO you're cruising for another block. -Shorty1982 15:11, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

Snatchers
Please stop adding pictures of random Snatchers to the article on Greyback's gang. Jayden Matthews 19:11, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

Are they not Greyback's gang?? I thought that Greyback were the Leader of all Snatchers. --Danniesen September 5 2011, 07:32 (Denmark)

RE:The Wizarding World of Harry Potter
You mean the theme park? It is located in Orlando, Florida; that's in the United States, not England. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 18:53, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

Semiprotected Tags and Blanking Pages
Removing the "delete" tag from a page and adding the "semiprotected" tag in its place does not actually block the article from changes. Only an administrator can actually apply protection to a page (that tag is merely for informational purposes) and removing the delete tag from a page is never considered acceptable without a discussion first unless the tag was clearly added as vandalism (for example - if someone added one to an article such as Harry Potter.) Also, blanking a page simply because you disagree with its contents is definitely against policy. ProfessorTofty 16:37, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Delete tags, again
How many time must you be told, delete tags are NOT to be removed without a community discussion? IMO you need to stop working on creating new articles and start working on improving existing ones. Remember, quality over quantity. -Shorty1982 16:55, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Creating more pages on "Unidentified such-and-such"
As there have been issues on the notability of the subjects of articles you have been creating recently (i.e. Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (IV)), I'd advise you to stop creating articles on unidentified individuals until such a time we decide to keep them or to delete them, as doing otherwise would be counter-productive for you and for the community in general. Thank you. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 19:54, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to draw your attention to this information from an administrator, to remind you that he advises you to STOP creating articles on unidentified individuals. -Shorty1982 22:45, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Arsenius Jigger
There's a precedent. Read about Julie Parkes and what was decided on the article's talk page. Or the Archie mentioned in Goblet of Fire, and the Archie Aymslowe mentioned in Pottermore. Given that Arsenius Jigger is a known Potion textbook author, it is a safe assumption that the propmakers intended Jigger to be the same person. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 18:08, November 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * A stylistic choice, probably. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 18:50, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Friendly reminder
I can see you've been reminded of this at the very top of the page, but I'm re-reminding you to make sure you add the proper categories to an article when you create it. It helps other users to find the page in question, especially since most of the articles you create (minor unidentified characters, letters, etc.) probably will never, or very rarely, be linked to by other articles (and this isn't me trying to say that's a bad thing, just stating a fact). -- 1337star (talk) 18:46, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * And I hate to bring up the same thing again, but I just had to add categories to the article that you created-- Harry Potter's letter about the Quidditch World Cup events and his dream to Sirius Black. Again, when you create the article, please just add the appropriate categories. It only takes a few seconds and it really helps people when it comes to finding pages, besides the fact that it's a required rule of style for all pages. ProfessorTofty 19:35, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

Official administrative warning
Having read through your talk page and seeing multiple warnings and reminders to follow this Wiki's policies, and seeing that you do not heed them in the slightest, I am issuing you with an official warning. Change your editing behaviour - by which, I mean starting to categorise your new articles, stop creating pointless and unnecessary articles, stop removing delete tags, stop copying non-relevant HP info from Wikipedia, etc, etc - or I will have no choice but to block you from editing. It is unfair for other editors to have to constantly warn you of mistakes that you are making time and time again, and to see their efforts to change your editing behaviour be for nought. Other editors have been blocked for less. I will be monitoring your edits closely. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 09:11, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

Your recent articles
It appears that Cavalier's warning has had as little impact on your behaviour as all the others you have recieved in the past year. For the record creating articles on individuals whose name's are mentioned in a single song heard on the radio in a single (non-canon) scene in a single film most definately falls under the category of "unnecessary". I'm begging you please concentrate you efforts on more constructive endeavours, such as reverting vandalism, fixing spelling mistakes etc. There are plenty of things you could do that would be of great benefit to the community. Jayden Matthews 13:23, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

Firstly, remeber to sign your talk page posts in the future. Secondly, if you find me overly critical perhaps it's because of the sheer contempt you show towards the rules of this community, and towards those who have been trying for the past year to help you improve. I didn't say anything particularly harsh in my last post. I even suggested some things you could do that would be helpfull. As for the matter at hand... very few of the articles you have created have been "necessary". The fact that the vast majority of them (including the two we are discussing) have been deleted should be evidence of this. The other articles that you pointed out are unique to Harry Potter and serve the purpose of highliting those who went missing to during Voldemort reign. There is such a thing as free speech here, and if you feel that an article is unnecessary then you are free to propose it's deletion, stating your reason. As your talk page demonstrates I am from far the only editor here who has taken issue with your behaviour, so please don't take your frustration out on me. Instead, I suggest your read through the many, many number of complaints you have recieved, and try to learn from them, rather than ignore them as you have been doing. Jayden Matthews 20:07, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

Please tell me how names mentioned in one song in a single scene of a movie are relevant to the Harry Potter universe. They're not. There's a huge difference between someone who is only mentioned in a song, is seen only in the background or mentioned by a background character in passing and being mentioned on Potterwatch. Potterwatch is top level canon from J. K. Rowling herself. -Shorty1982 01:19, November 12, 2011 (UTC)

Disc 2
Hey, there. Just a friendly reminder; it is unnecessary to add the appearances of certain characters/objects/locations on special features on "Disc 2" if the footage comes from the films themselves (i.e. Thomas Riddle tombstone appears in a special feature in Disc 2 of Order of the Phoenix, but that footage comes from the Goblet of Fire). Thanks. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 21:46, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Once again, please stop adding "Disk 2" as an appearnce. Stock footage that appears in the bonus features does not constitute a legitimate appearance. Jayden Matthews 21:12, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

Cooldown block
Per Cav's administrative warning, you have been blocked from editing the Harry Potter Wiki for a period of four weeks (28 days). Rethink your editing behaviour as this is your third block: next time, you might leave us no other choice but to use stricter means of administrative action (i.e. a permanent block). Thank you. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 21:30, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

I might be wrong, but i only think it is my second block. --Danniesen 22:38, 14 November, 2011 (Denmark)


 * They were three. Check your block log here. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 21:42, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

When you decide to unblock me i think i will start it all over. I will listen to your warnings, and do what you say. --Danniesen 07:26, 15 November, 2011 (Denmark)

Order of Merlin
Hi, Danniesen! I saw you have over 3.000 edits. So I wanted to wish good luck!

Dolores Umbridges ornamental plates
Good catch on those being in Deathly Hallows. I forgot that those things showed up in there as well. Actually, I think they have a certain charm, at least the ones in the film, anyway. I'm sure if I saw them as described in the book, I'd be just as disgusted as Harry was. ProfessorTofty 23:21, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Official Ministerial Business
The "Official Ministerial Business" bit of the ID was just saying that Hopkirk was only authorised to enter her department on business (or, whilst working). There are multiple other things capitalised by mistake on the ID text (i.e. "Signature", "Photograph", "Disclose"), this just seems to be yet another typo. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 21:28, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Lavender Brown's skin color
Do you realise how offensive it is to describe someone's ethnicity as a "disease"? Lavendar's skin color changes from dark to light because she's played by different actresses. It doesn't need to be listed in the infobox twice, and it definately doesn't need to be explained away by her being dieseased! Oh, and don't think I haven't noticed that you have once again disregarded Cavalier One's warning about copying content from Wikipedia. Jayden Matthews 11:49, December 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I wasn't replying to you, I posted that before I relalised you had messaged me. I was just pointing out how utterly disgusting what you wrote was, and that your attempts to continue your deliberately unconstructive behaviour unnoticed is not succeeding. Jayden Matthews 13:15, December 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't consider you my "enemy". Seriously, I'm not that petty. But frankly, the chances of us being friends is slim, simply because I find you so frustrating to deal with. The last time you were blocked you promised to change your behaviour upon your return. You have not done so in the slightest, quite the opposite, you have treated it as an oppertunity to carry on as before, in the hope that people here will have forgotten that you were supposed to be on your "final warning" several warnings ago. And FYI, just because I haven't tagged something for deletion it doesn't mean I'm "happy" with it. It means I've got better things to do. Jayden Matthews 13:56, December 26, 2011 (UTC)

Jack Russell Terrier
Is there any point in me asking you why you've copied yet another pointless article from Wikipedia? Can you not control yourself? I reported your ealier infractions to Seth, and he is considering permanently banning you from this site if you continue to violate your many, many warnings. Be warned. Jayden Matthews 13:07, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was about you, and yes you did copy the text from Wikipedia. I know, because I checked. Simply rearranging it does not make you the author. You could have added the attribution tag, like I suggested, but once again you ignore any attept to help you. 2011 was a bad year for you because you made it so. All anyone is asking of you is that you follow the rules of this site, like everybody else, but you seem to think that is beneth you. You're not a special case so I don't see why you should get the option of "changing your behaviour" in the new year rather than now. I take it that means you will be carrying on as usual until then? I'm not an admin (if I was you'd have been banned long ago) so you don't need my permision to create a new page. What you need to do is read through your talk page, realise where you've been going wrong, and think before you hit the edit button. Jayden Matthews 15:13, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * All the Harry Potter Wiki's policies can be found here. Also, I'm not sure what your intentions were on the magical creatures but your edit was most definately not helpfull, and had to be reverted. Jayden Matthews 15:41, December 28, 2011 (UTC)