Forum:Family articles

Ive noticed that we have family articles like the Potter family or the Macmillan family pages, that include people like Harry potter, and Charlus potter in the same family, yet there is no proof that they are related. I think something needs to be done about these kind of articles. It could lead to people looking at the potter family article, and assume Harry potter and Charlus potter being related.

I dont know, but maybe we could make it:

Potter family (I) for Charlus Potters family then Potter family (II) for Harry potters family.

Just to stop confusion What does everyone else think? 19:37, December 23, 2009 (UTC)