Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 11

Please discuss candidates for deletion here

Archived discussions

 * Archive

Current discussions
{{archive
 * result=Not Deleted
 * sig=-- Matoro 183 [[Image:Ravenclawcrest.jpg|20px]]{{sup|  (Talk) }} 13:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * discussion=

Mr. Payne
I Made A Page Named Mr. Payne, it has been put as a candidate for deletion for already a page about Mr. Payne but there is only my page about him


 * No need to delete it, I just redirected it to the existing article. - Nick O&#39;Demus 19:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Looking at it again, Mr. Payne is probably more accurate ((i.e. Mr. Roberts), so I've swapped the contents and redirects. - Nick O&#39;Demus 22:00, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

}}

mermide
i am sorry for using the infobox!! but it is just because i want to make a new house!! and i need a housebox!! but it never comes out proper?!!

This isn't a fanon wiki. You can't just make a new house. Jayden Matthews 14:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Might I suggest the Harry Potter Fanon Wiki instead. - Nick O'Demus 14:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't think you should delete that page. After all, it's true. Harry and Ginny did have sex.

69.120.199.227 02:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Thor

Remove Mr. Abbott
I do not agree to remove the page Hannah Abbott's father. You say that if not mentioned, can have its own page. But Mr. Pettigrew has its own page and is not mentioned.


 * Deleted them both. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:35, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Wait, please!
Do not delete the page Euan Abercrombie's friend. Now I'm mending. Is a character who comes alongside Euan in the Order of the Phoenix. Please and thank you.

Homer Simpson
I think the title of this article speaks for itself, but let me just say that 82.(blah blah) must be very bored right now if he's resorted to writing utter nonsense on a wiki site. I vote for this page to be demolished, not just deleted.--Yin&amp;Yang 14:46, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Deripia Anima
I created this because i have many friends that are Harry Potter Fans and they always asked me how a horcrux is made and what might the proper incantation and the possible ritual. I did a 2 hour research on the incantation alone and a 2 1/2 hour explanaion on how a horcrux may be created. I would appreciate it very much if you would not delete my article because it's not as rediculous as "Homer Simpson" article that I noticed.

I have many Harry Potter Fans for friends and they always ask me if I know how a Horcrux is made? So I researched on the internet and what the words for tear apart and soul were as you can see in the title. this page will explain to my friends what the possible incantation and ritual is needed to create a horcrux. I ask you to not delete this article, please and if you don't thank you.


 * Information on this wiki needs to come from official, verifiable sources. It doesn't matter if it's researched or well-reasoned, information created by fans is considered fanon and is not allowed. There is a Harry Potter Fanon Wiki where fans are freely able to make their own contributions to the Harry Potter universe, but this wiki must have official sources. As for the "Homer Simpson" article, that was an act of vandalism, and was deleted weeks ago. - Nick O'Demus 07:12, November 27, 2009 (UTC)


 * Article has been deleted. As Nick stated, articles should be from verifiable canon sources, not original research and fanon. Any further attempts to add fanon to this Wiki can be seen as attempted vandalism, and will be deleted on sight. - Cavalier One Gryffindorcrest.jpg( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 08:13, November 27, 2009 (UTC)

Chicken pot pie
Chicken pot pie was made for random spam. Marked as delete Ratneer 18:00, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Delete.--Station7 18:46, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Hogwarts founders
This page is unneccesary, there are seperate pages for the founders and the info is in the hogwarts page anyways. I think it should be deleted R a t n e e r Owl Alert! 22:08, December 11, 2009 (UTC)


 * Umm. No on should delete this because i wrote and i want to keep it!


 * First of all, Please Remeber after you post on a talk page, Type in ~ to add your signature. Also, 63.231.148.132 while I have you here, Please read your Talk page. -- R a t <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size=3 color="gold">n <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size=3 color="scarlet">e <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size=3 color="gold">e <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size=3 color="scarlet">r <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size=3 color="gold">Owl <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size=3 color="scarlet">Me!<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size=3 color="scarlet">Contribs 20:12, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

Utilisateur:Famini71/sig
No problem with this deletion: you can make it immediatly if you want it. I have already ask the deletion. Sorry to disturb you. -- 18:29, December 20, 2009 (UTC) (User:Famini71 you can see here why I was testing: my sign on the french wikia doesn't work on this wikia)

J.K. Rowling (witch)
This article is pieced together from scraps of evidence that do not support its bizarre assertion that a real person is also a fictional character. The text in the blue section of the Wizards' Book spine is too small to read clearly, and as for JKR signing her name at the end of the introduction to The Tales of Beedle the Bard, it's common practice for authors to do this, and it is in no way intended to indicate that JKR is also a character in the universe she has created.

This kind of overreaching speculation is detrimental to the wiki and needs to stop. <font color="Green">&#x2605; <font face="Times" color="green">S <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">a <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">r <font face="Times" color="green">s <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">u <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">f <font face="Times" color="green">f <font face="Times" color="darkgreen">(Owl me!) 20:09, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

Well, she does refer to herself as a muggle-born witch in the book. I know she was probably just being humerous, so I'm not sure if it figures into the canon of the wiki. Jayden Matthews 20:30, December 31, 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't recall where she refers to herself as a Muggle-born. I re-read the introduction, and it's not in that part. <font color="Green">&#x2605; <font face="Times" color="green">S <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">a <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">r <font face="Times" color="green">s <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">u <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">f <font face="Times" color="green">f <font face="Times" color="darkgreen">(Owl me!) 20:46, December 31, 2009 (UTC)


 * It's in one of the small print sections where she's providing a translation of wizarding terms. I can't remeber which story it's under though, probably FOFF. Jayden Matthews 20:52, December 31, 2009 (UTC)


 * I have searched this in all notes by JKR and haven't find it. 2 mentions about "Muggle-born" : "2 [A Squib is a person born to magical parents, but who has no magical powers. Such an occurrence is rare. Muggle-born witches and wizards are much more common. JKR] p16 (below, note 3 is by Dumbledore, he defined himself as a brillant wizard (it's not a note JKR) and "So-called pure-blood families maintain their alleged purity by disowning, banishing or lying about Muggles or Muggle-borns on their family trees." p10. So nothing with Muggle-born. User:Famini71 -- 21:17, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

[edit conflict] The annotations are mostly written by Dumbledore. The ones written by JKR are in square brackets and are signed with her initials at the end. I went through her annotations, and although she does mention Muggle-borns when defining what a Squib is ("Muggle-born witches and wizards are much more common") in the Hopping Pot notes, she never states that she's one herself. Directly under this annotation by JKR, however, is one by Dumbledore, which states "such as myself" in response to the statement in the main text that "some of the world's most brilliant wizards were, to use the common phrase, 'Muggle-lovers." Dumbledore also mentions Lucius Malfoy making "opprobrious remarks" about his "sanity, parentage, and hygience' " in an annotation in the notes for the Fountain of Fair Fortune. <font color="Green">&#x2605; <font face="Times" color="green">S <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">a <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">r <font face="Times" color="green">s <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">t <font face="Times" color="green">u <font face="Times" color="dimgrey">f <font face="Times" color="green">f <font face="Times" color="darkgreen">(Owl me!) 21:24, December 31, 2009 (UTC)


 * The title page of The Tales of Beedle the Bard is written in-universely ("Translated from the original runes by Hermione Granger"), so wouldn't Rowling's name below be in-universe, too? The same thing goes for the "Introduction" chapter. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 05:08, January 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * As much as I disagree with her being In-Universe, She would have to be considered in-universe, according to Seth's above statement. 05:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Bumping. So should we remove the deletion tag? -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 21:36, January 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's usual that page titles contain author's name, it seems to me really weird to consider that this could mean an in-universe fact. The name of Rowling appears for Beedle and editions 2009 of Quidditch and Fantastic beasts. But on the 2 last books, there's also in foreign editions the name of the real translator. If you consider an in-universe fact for Rowling, it would be the same fact for all translators in foreign languages... (j'ajoute un commentaire en français : ça va être le bazar)
 * Page titles for these 3 books are a wink and give in-universe facts, but cannot be considered entirely in-universe because it's the normality for this page to give real indications. -- 21:46, January 4, 2010 (UTC) Famini71


 * The thing is, that title page in particular presents us in-universe, canon facts (crediting Hermione Granger with the translation from "the original runes".) -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 13:20, January 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * It does not bother me that this page remains on the wiki or is erased. But as someone who worked in a library, I just want to indicate that the purpose of the title page is to present real information. This one (the same for the 2 other books I quoted) presents information in-universe but this does not change the purpose and does not mean that all informations are fictitious data. Nothing in any way in the introduction does (even taking it strictly for the purpose in-universe) that this supposedly fictional Rowling is a witch. To have an entire page about that is irrelevant, it's purely anecdotal and a "behind the scene" in the article about Rowling may be good enough. For Quidditch book, there's written Hogwarts, Wisp, Whizzhard books, all theses datas are in-universe. But there's also Rowling and for the french edition Jean-François Ménard, if there's a page for a "Rowling in-universe", there's must be a page for a "Ménard in-universe" and so on for foreign countries. Same thing for all real editors. -- 13:41, January 5, 2010 (UTC) Famini71

Fleur Delacour's grandfather
I didn't find Fleur Delacour's grandfather in the Goblet of fire (See Talk page). If he's really. not mentionned, there's speculation about Grandmother-Veela's children and grandchildren and their blood status. -- 21:23, December 31, 2009 (UTC) User:Famini71

Amberose Swott
We have worked out on Professor Ambone´s talk page that he and Anberose are the same person. To merge, we have to delete Amberose, haven´t we?--Rodolphus 15:54, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified Knockback Curse
There is not enough evidence to suggest that it is the same curse used on Bella. They were used by different people, had different affects, and are different spells. 98.117.158.220 00:46, January 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * The two spells had exactly the same effects. Besides, Sirius wasn't thrown into the veil and died; he was already dead and merely fell backwards into the veil. If no other evidence can be presented, this article is to be deleted. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 01:30, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * No he wasn't. The book says that he was still laughing even after he was hit and that just before he fell into the veil he looked surprise. The spell that Molly used just killed Belatrix. It may have even been the killing curse. 98.117.158.220 02:05, January 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * When Rowling says that "[the] laughter had not quite died from his face ", she is not stating that he was still laughing; she is saying that his facial expression was frozen. Also, Molly didn't use the Killing Curse on Bellatrix as she didn't die immediately. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 02:29, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * How do you know that? People get shocked when they're hit by the killing curse. 98.117.158.220 03:53, January 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * No they don't. As demonstrated throughout the serie, people just drop dead when hit with the Killing Curse. The Riddles were found with shocked expressions because they were shocked by seeing Voldemort before being hit with the curse. -- <font style="color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 13:23, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Seth.--Rodolphus 14:35, January 8, 2010 (UTC)