Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 1

This is an archive of closed discussions from Category talk:Candidates for deletion. Please do not modify it. It is her for archival purposes only.

Curse of the Bogies
 Article was redirected. John Reaves (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this page.

The article has no content, aside from the author saying that he doesn't know what the curse does (duh). I don't think there is even such a curse listed in the books. If someone can confirm this as the Bat-Bogey Hex, a redirect and write-up on said hex should be in order. The  Chosen  One  (Choose me!) 08:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not even useful as a redirect. The Bat-Bogey Hex has never been called "Curse of the Bogies."  bibliomaniac 15 23:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Moldymort
 Deleted. John Reaves (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC) THIS IS A PIECE OF NONSENSE!!!WHO EVER HEARD OF A HARRY POTTER BOOK 8!!!!!!
 * The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this page.

Yeah Moldymort should be deleted even the guy who made this article said this was fake.-Hp7

Dragon-Pox

This article should be deleted or rewritten it says that this disease occurs usually on old people but Horace Slughorn said that it was surprising that Abraxas had this disease-User:Hp7

Batty Fuck Complete idiotical nonsense nuff said-Hp7

Pantalonius Poopicus This is made up this is not a real spell it says there that it causes your enmy to "soil" himself-Hp7
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

c. 1951?
 Deleted. John Reaves (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC) There has been a deletion candidacy placed on C. 1951 citing as reason "already have 1951" but "1951" is just a redirect to 1950s. If we're not going to create individual year articles in that decade then the redirects should be to 1950s...I do think that both a c. 1951 and a 1951 article would be overkill,the link should be "c. 1951" where there is some doubt as to an event's occurring in exactly that year.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 05:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this page.
 * I agree, I felt that the article was overkill. If 1951 is the year we think it happened in it should just be placed in the 1951 article. The reason there is no seperate 1951 article right now is cause there isn't enough information so its just grouped into a decade. We probably should create seperate articles for each year, I think it's two seperate issues then and C. 1951 should still be deleted. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 21:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Glacius challenge, Black deeds challenge
 Deleted. John Reaves (talk) 18:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC) We may be many things, a wiki, an encyclopedia, a community of HP-lovers, but one thing we are not is a repository for walkthroughs or cheats for Harry Potter games, no matter how engrossing, interesting, or graphically advanced they may be. The  Chosen  One  (Choose me!) 17:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Agreed..I believe its more suited for the Harry Potter Fanon then here..-- Cometstyles 19:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, well put! But yes, if anyone wants cheats or walkthroughs they should go to a site specifically for cheats and walkthroughs rather than a miscellaneous information site. --Littlesparrow 12:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Alrighty-o, I don't think anybody will oppose, other than the fans who posted the stuff in the first place. I have edited the policy page to include game cheats and walkthroughs in the "Delete on Sight" list - admins, please take note. Any objections, please post in the CommPortal. So, here goes (and there's another walkthrough about the crumple retraction challenge something or other, will get that too). The  Chosen  One  (Choose me!) 15:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Apparition/Disapparition
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> Article was merged and redirected.  bibliomaniac 15 04:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this page.

Stub article that turns out to be a subpage. Deletion or merging would be best.  bibliomaniac 15 00:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking merging and redirecting to Apparation would be best. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 01:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.  bibliomaniac 15 04:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.