Template talk:Vague

Design
Hi, so I think the template has some merits; if it is deemed worth to be kept, I want to ask about how to make the template better.

Prior to my modification, the text displayed was "This subject is far too vague or ubiquitous to have a list of appearances. It probably appears in every release/title of the Wizarding World franchise. If you think there are exceptions, please list them below. ". To me, the last sentence makes little sense; if there are "exceptions", as in release(s)/title(s) that the subject actually didn't appear in, why should said release(s)/title(s) be listed? It is supposed to be a list of appearances after all, NOT a "list of not-appearances". So I modified it to something that I think would make sense; but in doing so, substituting would be needed for the editor note to be rendered, which, to me, feels like I went about it the wrong way.

Dunno. I like the simplistic formatting, making it somewhat like and the likes, an official message of sort? But I feel like the part about potential need of adjustments, just doesn't fit with the message. So I thought about looking like category:Maintenance templates:

I stress, I do like the simplicity of the original formatting choice, but I just feel the second part of the message doesn't go with it? Thoughts? -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 19:24, March 26, 2019 (UTC)