Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 11

Please discuss candidates for deletion here

Archive

Harry Potter & Cho Chang
This article could be merged with Cho Chang and Harry Potter if verifable.

SPoT
Personally, I feel that this article about a specific section of the HP fandom is not notable enough to include in this wiki. If we allow one subset of fans their own page, then we have to do it for all fan groups, and that will clog up the wiki with fan/ vanity pages. Thoughts on this? - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 01:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I totally agree, I don't belive any fanon should be aloued on this wiki, but I know you allow some i.e. Wizard Rock, but this is nowhere near notable enough, I hadn't even heard of it!Harry Potter Fantic 1 02:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Harry Potter Fantic 1


 * This is just a bid for internet fame or advertising for that site and i think this is the wrong place for it. Besides it isn't written in encyclopedic format. Mafalda Hopkirk 09:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and Delete, we found a diffrent wikia. I just wanted to point out that 1. We aren't trying to get internet fame since we already have it. 2. We aren't advertising for a site, we don't want others to join. We have been asked why we didn't have a wikia site by someone who had heard of us (you might even call them a fan!) and we went ahead with the idea. Firehawk905 14:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Done - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Kill Harry
I dont think that we need this because I think it is fanon, but I don't know. - Tyminator1 (Talk) 13:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree! Mafalda Hopkirk 13:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not fanon, but it is fan fiction. The question is, is it notable enough to be included? -  Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 14:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ive never heard about it till now so i consider it to be not notable enough.Me_Potter_Fan 23:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Harry Potter Book 8?
This article should be deleted.Me_Potter_Fan 03:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * More appropriate as a forum topic, not an article. Mafalda Hopkirk 07:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Done - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 08:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Mutilated baby
This article should be deleted. It's disgusting and offensive. There is nothing more to write about the "mutilated baby" that appears at King's Cross other than this one paragraph, so having an article entitled "mutilated baby" seems vulgar and obsolete. Mafalda Hopkirk 08:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)