Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations/Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

{{archive
 * result=Not Promoted
 * sig=-- DarkJedi613 {{sup|(Talk)}} 15:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * discussion=

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (1 vote for, 2 against)
(cont ribs) ]] 01:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC) }}
 * Support: Looks like a good article to me. Q u i d d i t c h L o v e r (My <font face=Comic Sans MS color=green>talk)  [[Special:Contributions/Quidditch Lover|<font face=Comic Sans MS color=gold>
 * Against: The chapter summaries are very poorly written.-- 12:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Against: Not ACTUALLY a cannon article since it's about the book itself rather than the events/people. --KristiannaEl 05:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)