User blog comment:Kacieh/Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows- Part 1 Review Page/@comment-3230278-20101124191412

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 1 was incredibly accurate with the book, they did miss out on some parts of the book that weren't that important and were considered as extras (like the fact that Harry wore the Invisibility cloak on the streets after the wedding) but i was very disappointed when they didn't include very important facts in the movie (like the fact that harry had to go to the wedding in disguise or that they had the invisibility cloak the entire time and that this was a mayor part in the plot, now in part two it's gonna be like "oh the invisibility cloak was a hallow, no sure we had it the entire time we just didn't use it in the ministry and blahblahblah" ) I was also extremely disappointed at the fact that they never told Dumbledore's story during the movie but just showed that Rita made a book about him, plus they never even talk about Ariana (well how could they since they never even INCLUDED THE TERM SQUIB IN ANY OF THE PREVIOUS MOVIES!!!! HUGE FLAW IN PRODUCTION) I guess the biggest flaw they made was actually involving the piece of enchanted mirror that Sirius left Harry but never actually explained what it was and it looked like Harry as an idiot for looking at it or for even screaming into it knowing that someone would listen. They should have really mentioned it's abilities at least or something. All in all it was incredibly accurate compared with the rest of the books (especially "the Order of the Phoenix"), had minor flaws in some of the details, and they could have used more time to explain some of the things for an audience that hasn't read any of the books.