Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 11

Please discuss candidates for deletion here

Archived discussions
Lists of archived discussions and their results. Sorted by year in which the discussion started.
 * Archive 1
 * Archive 2
 * Archive 3
 * Archive 4
 * Archive 5

Studying girls
Studying girls has been a candidate for deletion for over a month. Any input on whether it should be deleted or not? -- Texthawm (Owl Me) 23:16, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Katie Weasley for Deletion
The ' Katie Weasley' Page should be deleted. It is wrong in so many areas and is obviously someone making stuff up.

Delete Caroline Ghostwhisper?
Caroline Ghostwhisper is an obvious candidate for deletion, as it has nothing but pictures that have nothing to do with Harry Pottter, nor does it have text.

Professor Trelawney's inner eye
Somebody put this up as a candidate for deletion but her inner eye is one of the most important things in the books. If she did not have it voldemort would have never died because of Snape Eve's dropping on the prediction. Then voldemort created his own enemy which of course is harry.

The later life of the potters and weasley's
I think this one should definitely be removed. Apart from terrible spelling, it is empty and really doesn't contribute to this wiki. Anyone agree? *Ginny* 02:43, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Dobby's shoes
An absolutely bizarre and pointless article. All it says is that Dobby owned a pair of shoes after being freed by the Malfoy's. If this stays, then we'll be seeing articles like "Ron's wellington boots" and "Hermione's spare Hogwarts robes" appearing soon. 82.42.249.145 17:03, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

I disagree, I think articles should be made for clothing only if it's useful and the clothing is memorable in the film. By useful, I mean it explained to some who may not know about the difference they saw in Dobby's atire in Part 1. And if they look at Dobby's clothes, it's linked in case they want to know more about it. *Luna (I suspect Nargles are behind it... ) 18:02, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * No other character has an article for a non-significant piece of their clothing. Keeping this article would be like having one for Ron Weasley's robes or Hermione's coat. I agree that it is fairly pointless.-- Matoro 183 (Talk) 20:10, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Luna, you say it is linked in case they want to know more about it. That would be fair enough, but the article doesn't give any more information about it. It just says he owned a pair of shoes. That's it. 82.42.249.145 19:52, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Luna, you say it is linked in case they want to know more about it. That would be fair enough, but the article doesn't give any more information about it. It just says he owned a pair of shoes. That's it. 82.42.249.145 19:52, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

WTF and My feetsies are stuck
I discovered these pages: WTF and My feetsies got stuck.

There is no point to any of these pages, as they are nonsense and pose heavy vandalism to this wiki. They also really have nothing to do with Harry Potter.

I will continue to find more examples of vandalism and post it here for deletion.

I agree with this. That page is only vandalism.

Jay Barrymore
It's about Emma Watson's ex-boyfriend.