User talk:CosmicChronos

Discussions Moderator
Due to the lack of active admins that regularly contribute at Discussions, I've made you and Annabeth and Percy Discussions Moderators. Thanks, and keep up the good work! --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 18:36, November 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on your promotion! :D ― C.Syde  ( talk  |  contribs ) 09:18, November 12, 2016 (UTC)


 * I have blocked, has been made Discussions Mod.
 * Moderators can't, by definition, block users, and that's not something that's really in my power to change. Thanks. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 18:28, December 13, 2016 (UTC)

Daring on Harry Potter wiki
Hey CC,

I was wondering some people are getting really annoyed at the dare game (not me) and I was wondering, so the people who like it can still do it can you create some sort of place we can do it like a Category in the post category?

NewtFred4eva (talk) 06:45, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

RE:Discussions Board
Hi! I'm not sure. I can still access it; perhaps it was temporarily down? --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 20:02, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

RE:Ban option for Moderators (With more info)
Hello. If it is possible, then I wouldn't feel comfortable changing it unilaterally; this is something that should be discussed by the community (feel free to add a new topic at The Wizengamot), and, at the very least, the other admins should be heard on the matter.

Also, Psithurism, Harrypotterfreak233, and Dobby.77.free have been made Discussions Mods. Cheers. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 22:04, December 20, 2016 (UTC)

Leta.
Good. Right after undoing it, I thought that maybe I should have talked to you first. Good to see we both agree on that point. Have a nice day.--Rodolphus (talk) 11:42, December 21, 2016 (UTC)

Question
Hey CC, Thanks for making me a moderator! Also, is there a page where we can see what posts and comments have been reported?? and why is the Moderation Panel?? Cheers, Harrypotterfreak233 (talk) 20:11, December 22, 2016 (UTC)

Voldemort004
This user, Voldemort004, is posting kind of useless posts and he's pretending that he's actually Voldemort. I don't really know why I told you but I did anyway... Also, for Quotely, when and where can I have an interview with you? And I figured out the reported content thanks Harrypotterfreak233 (talk) 11:50, December 23, 2016 (UTC)

Voldemort004 (rule)
Hello CC, Yes I think we should make it a rule that you cannot say you are a canon character out of RolePlay. Also, he often talks about killing himself with a noose (hanging himself) which i don't find entirely appropriate... Thanks. Harrypotterfreak233 (talk) 13:28, December 23, 2016 (UTC)

Rupertgrint9
He's back Harrypotterfreak233 (talk) 22:40, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

Firebolt Flying
Hey CC,

I hope u remember me. I made added a page on this wiki made by u. Hope u don't mind. Cheers

Reverb frost (talk) 05:45, February 24, 2017 (UTC)

E-Mail Address
Greetings CC,

I was wondering that is there a way to find out the email address of a user?? I mean The email address using which the wiki account was created!

Reverb frost (talk) 13:46, July 18, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Harry Potter Netflix Show
Hi, not Seth, but I can answer. Yes, it is fake. If you take your time, you will notice that the date of this article is the samedate as when Fred and George were born. Namely, April 1st. It was an April Fools joke. TheTARDISLegilimens (talk) 13:15, November 19, 2017 (UTC)


 * I was going to say that's the first time I was hearing about it, but yeah. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:44, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

RE:Discussions Moderator
Sure, if you think I would be a good fit for the role, I'd be happy to take on the position. -- 1337star (Drop me a line!) 16:40, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Userbox
I suggest you use this template (userbox) that I created, type in Discussions mod It appears as this:

Re:Vandal
You're a mod? Maester Martin (talk) 13:43, July 7, 2018 (UTC)

Gottcha. :-) Maester Martin (talk) 13:55, July 7, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Banner for the wiki
✅ your Discussions requests. As for the banner, I tried it, and it doesn't work very well with the background -- thanks for the suggestion anyway! Cheers. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 13:31, July 11, 2018 (UTC)

Uagadou subjects
How is Transfiguration, Alchemy, and Astronomy not being subjects at Uagadou not considered "canonical evidence"? Uagadou students are well-versed in Astronomy, Alchemy, and Self-Transfiguration meaning those are subjects at Uagadou, or they wouldn't be well-versed in it. IlvermornyWizard (talk) 17:54, July 11, 2018 (UTC) IlvermornyWizard

RE:Admin Dashboard
I have no idea why that's so. Odd. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 17:39, July 15, 2018 (UTC)
 * Says you're a discussion moderator, which could be the reason. AVoraciousReader (talk) 19:49, July 15, 2018 (UTC)


 * Don't think that's the case however, as my co-mods can't see it. I thought it could have been due to me being Councillor, but that wasn't the case either, as
 * I didn't have access to it on other wikis.
 * Cheers,
 * CosmicChronos      Talk to me       Contribs    20:09, July 15, 2018 (UTC)


 * I don't find it again, but I read in the Community Central Wiki that discussion mods should get access to the dashboard but I don't know anymore on which user talk page I read this, sorry.  Harry granger   Talk  <font style="background:yellow;color:;"> <font style="background: #99CCFF;color:#993300;"> contribs <font style="background: #99CCFF;color:#993300;"> 22:24, July 15, 2018 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by co-mods can’t see it? I’m pretty sure we can...Well, I know that I can. Plus, admins can’t give Discussion Mods the power to see the admin dashboard. Only FANDOM Staff can. By the way, Seth, we can’t edit any pages or anything, just we can only see it ;) --HarryPforLife (talk) 23:18, July 15, 2018 (UTC)


 * I did not know that -- that must be it, then. Cheers! -- <font style="background:#FFFFFF;color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 00:17, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

Hogwarts Hallways RP Thread (MagnificentMagnus)
I see that you've just locked the thread. What is the reason for this - is it too full? Or is it the content? Because, I was looking forward to continuing the RP... -- <font style="background:#FFE633;color:red;"> MagnificentMagnus <font style="background:yellow;color:#31BDB1;">  Talk  <font style="background:yellow;color:;"> <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> contribs <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> 10:35, July 24, 2018 (UTC)
 * You can continue here: Roleplay

CosmicChronos      Talk to me       Contribs    10:41, July 24, 2018 (UTC) Thanks, Cos! Just need to get the other users there - I'll have to write on their user pages... -- <font style="background:#FFE633;color:red;"> MagnificentMagnus <font style="background:yellow;color:#31BDB1;">  Talk  <font style="background:yellow;color:;"> <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> contribs <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> 10:57, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

Resigning
I understand that you're only doing what you think is best, but I think our new rules are far too strict and are going to lead to the sudden death of the community. It's not something I feel I can be a part of. I already feel that we delete/lock far too much already, and this is just going to lead to almost everything being deleted because almost nobody that's part of the Discussions audience lives up to those standards. I could almost put up with the changes if it wasn't for this: "Ban after a breach of rules, no warning". That's completely unacceptable and I won't do it.

Anyway, I wish you all the best, but consider this message my immediate resignation and an end to my posting in Discussions. I know it's what they always say, but I mean it when I say this: it's not you, it's me. I can't moderate that strictly. I will stick to the editing side of the wiki from now on. -- 1337star (Drop me a line!) 16:00, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Magnus
I'm absolutely delighted by the idea of helping out as a pseudo-MOD! There's only one prob: since I don't have a phone, I can't use KIK to communicate - would the Wiki Chat suffice, then? --Regards, <font style="background:#FFE633;color:red;"> MagnificentMagnus <font style="background:yellow;color:#31BDB1;">  Talk  <font style="background:yellow;color:;"> <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> contribs <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> 02:37, August 9, 2018 (UTC)

P.S. One more thing - is Marc back? He's posting again... I hope that's a good sign... :) <font style="background:#FFE633;color:red;"> MagnificentMagnus <font style="background:yellow;color:#31BDB1;">  Talk  <font style="background:yellow;color:;"> <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> contribs <font style="background: #4A9C4C;color:silver;"> 02:45, August 9, 2018 (UTC)

No one is taking any moderation actions on the wiki. And if you want to take any actions at all, be sure to email the staff before you do so.

Reverb frost (talk) 09:30, October 13, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Moderation
Hey there kid, You are right, you don't need permission to mod a wiki you are assigned for. But you need permission from an admin because this situation isn't ideal. It's way different, so you will need to inform admin and have their consent. Anyways talking about the so called "PROOFS". Well the "PROOFS" that you have are the mod action list present in the insight option, which says I have made some 930+ action in past 90 days and 13 actions in past 30 days. Well those actions are me undeleting the deleted posts by ex-mod TheDarkMarc. And for that i have permission from an admin and a staff which I'm sure you aren't aware of. Moreover the past day 30 mod actions would most likely be me editing my own posts after the 24 hours limit which are considered as mod actions but isn't me modding. So when I say that I'm not doing any moderation at all, I mean it. If you want me to talk to staff and take out my own log actions list of HPW to confirm my statement I'll be happy to do so. And listen up kid, this thing of us coming after each other is over. So stop it and move on, get a job maybe. But if you are willing to start this thing all over again then let it be known that you are the initiator of this round of fight when it was clearly put to bed by admins. And why can't you assume my presence on HPW dboard as good faith. Assuming good faith is a wiki rule and as a councilor you are violating that rule by threatening me. So assume my presence as good faith rather than threaten me. Reverb frost (talk)

RE Multiple Accounts
I saw your message for Seth, but figured I'd point you to the Multiple Accounts Policy where it states - "All the accounts a user controls will be treated as the same person." and "If any of a user's accounts are to be blocked, then all accounts associated with that user will also be blocked." As such, your actions are entirely inline with the Wiki's policies. Just wanted you to know in case Seth is busy for a bit. Cheers --Ironyak1 (talk) 16:27, October 19, 2018 (UTC)


 * I was going to say the same, but Ironyak1 beat me to it.
 * As for the other matter, I am of the opinion that there doesn't have to be an administrator specifically assigned for the Discussions board. That said, I do realise it would perhaps be for the best if there were. You are free to apply for the position here, pending a community discussion/vote. Cheers. -- <font style="background:#FFFFFF;color:#333333;"> Seth Cooper <font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> owl post! 11:00, October 20, 2018 (UTC)

Permissions request
You may want to review Harry Potter Wiki:Voting policy - note that you'll need 3 more yes votes than no votes and whichever admin handles the voting process cannot participate. I'd advise that you are prepared so that you can get the majority votes you need should voting be opened. Cheers --Ironyak1 (talk) 03:41, October 24, 2018 (UTC)


 * Voting is usually left open for a week or two, but it is up the admin moderating the vote. I have to ask - in this edit why would you remove the comment and say the user was not eligible to vote? Thanks --Ironyak1 (talk) 17:11, October 24, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Dmods additional rights
Hey there, Having opinions is not wrong. I know that the vote will happen but people should be aware of the reality. Making you an admin won't change anything. And your priority is d/b and an admin is responsible for the entire wiki. I can say this from a long observation of you that you cannot handle wikis. The only way you can do so is by going to extreme ends and imposing rigorous rules. And listen kid, I don't mix personal issues with professional ones. So you don't need to be worried about it. I want the admins to be well aware of the facts, +ve and -ve so that they can make right desicion. You talk about editing categories as a councilor you should be aware of the latest update regarding that something that comes under our NDA. And worry not, I am well aware of my duties and responsibilities, I am not insulting anyone just stating facts. Truth is bitter, really bitter. Reverb frost (talk)

New Voting/Admin Rights
Hello CosmicChronos, after looking into your and Reverb Frosts conversations, I decided I'm going to add my opinion on the matter. One thing I see wrong with you becoming an admin here is your activity. In case you haven't noticed, you've been (luckily) listed as semi-active as a Dmod, which says to me that you can barely deal with Mod rights on such an active wiki. I quite agree that there should be a new admin, but I don't believe you are the person for the job. I believe an admin for the Discussion Board is a terrific idea, but your intentions are wrong. I am currently an admin and Bureaucrat for 3 wiki's, so I am familiar with everything the admins do. When the vote finally comes, I'm gonna have to say that I won't be voting.

Regards,

Dave 14:35, October 24, 2018 (UTC)

It wasn't Reverb that convinced me. I personally don't agree with Reverb ever, but he has some truth to his words. I had a Chat with The Dark Marc a couple months ago, and he mentioned you being very inactive. So I checked out, and noticed there was a month span between two of your posts. I agree Reverb isn't the nicest person to get to deal with, but that doesn't mean he is lying. Listen, CosmicChronos, if you were more active, I would vote yes. But the fact being that you were very inactive recently, I don't know if I will vote of not. Marc also told me about Reverb trying to get you banned for violating the age policy. I can't say an underage user as an admin will help the wiki at all.

Regards,

Harrypotterexpert101 15:02, October 24, 2018 (UTC)