Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations

List of Former Nominations
I think we should have a place to nominate new Fetured Articles. - User:Scrimgeour
 * I agree. Would it be OK to set up a Harry Potter Wiki:Featured Article Nominations page (or would this have to be done by an admin)? 00:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I think this talk page is fine. John Reaves (talk) 00:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok so is there a set pattern for nominating an article? and shouldn't there be a link from the main page to here to nominate articles?-- Thai420 Whats up? 01:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I kind of redid the pattern they were in to follow it easier. Just a thought what does a page need to become featured? Does it need a certain amount of votes, or the most by a certain point, etc? Also, since I put vote counts in the title, it'd make sense to update them if you vote. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 22:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

What if we did a featured article every week then we would be able to keep it fresh and people won't get bored looking at the same one all the time.--user: Weasleytwins19
 * I agree with Weasleytwins19, if more users became active in the nomination process we would be able to put the featured article on a weekly rotation.-- user: JayLupin38
 * I think its a good idea. I always thought it was strange that Voldemort was the featured article for so long. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 18:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

New Nominations
Please add F.A. Nomination Template to the top of all pages nominated for Featured Article.

List them here and we will all pick the one which has the most votes:

Fred and George Weasley (1 Votes for, 6 Against)

 * Support -Weasleytwins19
 * Oppose - I don't think it is long enough to be a featured article yet. It is still a stub after all. - Scrimgeour
 * Oppose - Expand it first, then I'll gladly vote for it (not even feeding me Edible Dark Marks will change my mind) RaggieSoft 00:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Needs to be greatly expanded. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 18:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Still a stub!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ginerva Potter-Weasley 15:14, August 13 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Too short, and should probably have a separate article for each twin. 01:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose its just a link page pick a twin but still no because there to short dumbledore13

Gryffindor (2 Votes for, 1 against)

 * Support He's a famous head of house.
 * Oppose The majority of the article is a list of known Gryffindor's. The article could definitly be expanded to include years they've won the house cup, quidditch cup, more information about the common room, etc. (Also did you mean Godric Gryffindor? Cause the page Gryffindor is about the house not the founder.) -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 22:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Support I agree that it could be expanded, but I still support it. tyminator1

Charlie Weasley (4 Votes for, 0 against)

 * Support I have rewritten the article to conform to in-universe policy, added quotes where appropriate, sourced and referenced.  It lacks sufficient images, though, due to a lack of source material in that area. - Cavalier One 15:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Second - It might be a small Article but its well written and sourced..-- Cometstyles 15:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Support -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 21:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Support -Ederaj 03:26, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

wand (1 vote for,0 against)

 * support -dumbledore13

Bill Weasley (4 votes for, 0 against)

 * Support Article has been rewritten and expanded to conform with in-universe policy, added quotes and images where appropriate, sourced and referenced. - Cavalier One 20:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 20:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Yup well written and well referenced..Good Nom..-- Cometstyles 20:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Nice attention to detail in selection and arrangement of quotes and pictures that support and enhance the main text. PinkRibbons 21:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)