Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations

Please read the Featured articles page before posting here for rules and regulations. For past nominations (promoted and rejected) please see the Former nominations page. For all new nominations please add them to the bottom of the list and follow the template given by the other nominations. In addition, please add F.A. Nomination Template to the top of all pages nominated to be a Featured Article.

Please note: only registered users may vote for Featured Articles. All votes from anon IPs will be struck in accordance with policy.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) (1 vote for, 7 against)

 * Support: KH 02:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Against: Still a total mess, needs cleanup big time. It has the potential, but for now I just can't support. 12:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Against: I agree. 12:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Against: I'm intrigued to know what made KH think this would be a suitable featured article in the fist place? –K.A.J•T•C•E• 16:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Against: It needs clean-up but it would be a great one for later. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xtraii (talk • contribs).
 * Against: I agree, it's not quite ready. -- Cubs Fan2007 (Talk)  17:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Against: Nowhere near ready for FA.-- 21:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Against: I agree. It needs more pictures and subsections. Gryff23 02:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Werewolf (3 votes for, 0 against)

 * Support: Good details, images, quotes, and references. Oread 16:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support: Looks good to me. 02:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support: Nice. 02:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Polyjuice Potion (3 votes for, 0 against)

 * Support: Has lots of images and quotes, pretty detailed, has references, and I think it would be cool to have a potion as a featured article. 20:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support: The intro could use some expansion, but other than that, it looks good to me. -- Cubs Fan2007 (Talk)  22:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I expanded the intro some... but it still needs work. 22:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Support: For all the reasons above. I also expanded the intro a bit per suggestion. Oread 22:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Fred Weasley (1 vote for, 0 against)

 * Support: I recently added references and etymology, so I think it's about ready now. Oread 16:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)