User blog comment:Foozie Bear/Harry Potter Books vs. Movies/@comment-58.169.46.161-20120320070616

i think it depends, for instance the transaction of the fifth book into a film was pretty bad and ruined the rest. Because they had to take out so many scenes they then had to modify the ending so it still made sense. Amazingly the sixth was pretty accurate, but it was all about snape and the horcruxes which didnt have much impact on the change of the previous film. About half of the sisth film was filled with the fun romance of being a stupid teenager that goes for looks and not qualities. the first few books were short so it was easier to fit the film with the essentials and not cut out or add too much. i loved the fifth book, but one of my favourite movies was the sixth. why the sixth isn't at the top by far is because they replaced tonks with luna in the scene on the express and Tonks is my favourite character so i was waiting to watch that scene