Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 11

Please discuss candidates for deletion here

Archive

Harry Potter & Cho Chang
This article could be merged with Cho Chang and Harry Potter if verifable.
 * All info was merged so the page itself can be deleted. Mafalda Hopkirk 12:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Done. - Cavalier One' ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 09:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Kill Harry
I dont think that we need this because I think it is fanon, but I don't know. - Tyminator1 (Talk) 13:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree! Mafalda Hopkirk 13:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not fanon, but it is fan fiction. The question is, is it notable enough to be included? -  Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 14:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ive never heard about it till now so i consider it to be not notable enough.Me_Potter_Fan 23:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it should be deleted; It's a relevent parody, and I didn't know about it until reading that particular page. Safe 19:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

April 1
I just don't think this page is needed. Mafalda Hopkirk 03:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree. If we keep this page we would have to create pages for the other character's birthdays. Dumblydoor 15:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Category - Non-Canonical Spells
There is just one page with every non-canonical spell on it now. I think the group should be deleted. Mafalda Hopkirk 08:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Members of the Order of the Phoenix
(from discussion page)Do we really need a page with links to categories about the Order of the Phoenix? We have all the members listed at Order of the Phoenix anyway, and characters are categorised by whether or not they were in the first or second orders. And, by deleting, we eliminate an Orphaned Page. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 14:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * If all the info is located on the main article then I don't see the need for a second page. Mafalda Hopkirk 20:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As noted, I'm for deletion of this article. - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 08:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Done - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 09:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Wizarding genetics
(copied from talk page) I think we should merge this with Blood Purity, and have Blood Purity be the main article. Mafalda Hopkirk 05:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's even needed. It contains too much Original Research, and none of the article is backed up by any evidence from the series. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 08:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Grandmother Remus
1. Her first and last name can never be known 2. Her first name is not Grandmother and her last name is not Remus - Remus is Lupin's first name. 3. How can her blood status ever be determined? Mafalda Hopkirk 17:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Deleted - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Grandfather Remus
1. His first and last name can never be known 2. His first name is not Grandfather and his last name is not Remus - Remus is Lupin's first name. 3. How can his blood status ever be determined? Mafalda Hopkirk 17:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Deleted - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Magic Ancestor
Fanon. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Deleted - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Goblin ancestor
Fanon. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Deleted - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

John Lupin
Fanon. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Deleted - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Remus Jhon Lupin
Not a typo. Duplicate page of Remus Lupin. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:600px-Yes check.svg.png|px]] Deleted - Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Dave Legeno
Unless this person is going to act in future HP movies it has nothing to do with HP. Mafalda Hopkirk 22:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * According to The Leaky Cauldron, he is rumoured to be playing Fenrir Greyback in Half-Blood Prince. Cleaned up and kept for now, but will be deleted if it proves false. -  Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

What does the bottom of the book one means
Not a typo. Garbage. Mafalda Hopkirk 03:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?
There has recently been the addition (by 66.245.29.175) of all these pages of characters who, from what I can tell, are not from the HP series at all. They are all listed as "Muggles". I think they may be characters from the television show Heroes, but I'm not familiar enough with it to be sure. I've tagged a few for deletion, but I think they're all vandalism. 24.141.82.173 23:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * They were all Heroes character, yep. Great show but not welcome here.  All deleted. -  Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 08:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Unidentified student
I just think that this article is not necessary. The character doesn't exist in the books, and has a very minor role in the movie. The title is not very "professional", and it is just not a good article. Freakatone 17:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Got to go with Keep on this one. He's a notable addition to the movies, is arguably as important and noticable as Nigel, and just because he isn't in the books is no reason not to include him on the wiki.  This wiki covers all aspects of the HP universe, from the books to the games.  Also, while the title may not be "professional", it is accurate.  Also, the character reportedly has garner a small amount of interest within certain elements of the fan community. -  Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network ) 17:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with Cavlier One. He's a character -- no matter how small. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 16:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)