<p>@Darrell Malik Did you read the books. Im just curios. Did voldemort seemed like a person who would want a child to you? Or someone who would want to do sex? Or someone who wont use lets say condom spell even if he want to do sex? Or do you think he is able to produce a child after what he had done to himself. Personally I think voldemort would never want a child or heir since he wants immortality, And he would never let someone to get close to his holy body. He would definately used some spell to remove his desires if even have sex desires. And we dont even know if he can produce a patronus. So him producing a child seems weird. We dont hate delphine because we dont even recognise her existence.</p>

^ I did. Multiple times in fact. And a melodramatic like Voldemort would sire someone who would continue on his legacy, considering he tried recruiting Harry at some point. You say like having sex with someone would be considered precious to Voldemort.  We're talking a Dark Lord who is known for wanting failsafes in place, just to keep his immortality going. He was a charming character growing up, so it's hardly unlike he didnt have such needs, or sexual urges. Voldemort is still human at his core, and why would he not like having sex with people at some point? Having sex doesn't automatically mean they're in love, or such feelings are involved. And what does a patronus have anything to do with it? Pretty sure most Death Eaters cant cast the spell, and pretty sure most of them have kids, or are you magically forgetting Draco Malfoy? Kids obviously can happen and just because one can't cast doesnt automatically remove the ability to reproduce.

<p>He would never want someone continue his legacy because he would never want to leave his legacy. His dream is immortality. This means no heir needed or wanted. And patronus example was arbitrary, i was talking about his doings on his soul and body. He shattered his soul literally and his body suffered from it(deformations). Im not even mentioning him dying and making a new body with magic. These doings cost voldemort so much as always dumbledore said. I dont think he would be able to give life to a child.</p>

Obviously he would, since he has a daughter now. Even if his dream was immorality, things change over time and Voldemort hardly would be immune to such thoughts, 9r actions. Then don't include such arbitrary facts, if it hardly adds to the discussion,  it's pointless and so easy to poke holes through it. Having less of a soul, or constructing a new body hardly means it still can't produce sperm, and Voldemort's body obviously could since it conceived a child, and again, with so many spells around, how hard would it to not be able to produce a child differently in the wizarding world? It caused his body to deform, and I'm pretty sure the consequences Dumbledore was hinting at were about Harry and Voldemort being tied together, not some sort of physical deformity like being unable to have kid's.

<p>Your discussion material cant be 'it did happen' while im talking about why it shouldnt happen. Im saying 'Voldemort wanting a heir doesnt make sense to me so I dont consider these canon and he doesnt have a chield' and youre saying 'Obvıosly he wanted since he had a child'. This is a dilemma and we cant argue over it. You can accept this book as canon but im not accepting and frankly some strangers who didnt understand wizarding world at all writing it makes my job easier. If it would be all-Rowling work I wouldnt be able to reject it in my head.</p>