Can't disregard Cursed Child because Rowling said it's canon. So however you or anyone else feels about it, the creator of the series says it's legit.

You're wrong. Love potion didn't contribute. It was metaphorical. Proof:

"It was a symbolic way of showing that he came from a loveless union – but of course, everything would have changed if Merope had survived and raised him herself and loved him."

It's clear it wasn't the love potion. If so, it would go against the message in the books.

Can't disregard Cursed Child because Rowling said it's canon. So however you or anyone else feels about it, the creator of the series says it's legit.

Sure, the creator says it's legit. But the CC has so many plotholes and poor writing, that it just makes itself automatically non canon looking. The personalities of characters are way off and make no sense. It would make more sense if it was well written, with correct personalities

It doesn't really have any plot-holes, at least no more than the rest of the books. And the books takes place over a decade in the future, and are affected by time changing. Personalities change over time, and due to the past being changed.

They definitely have plot holes way more than the original books. And they do ruin the characters. Harry doesn't act like the Harry we know. And Ron is dumbed down.

Which plot-holes? And which Harry and Ron though. Don't forget, the past was changed several times, resulting in "different" Harrys and Rons due to the past changing so their lives turned out different before those changes were undone.

The characters acting like someone completely different is a plothole.

Cedric would never become a death eater under any circumstances. That's another one.

Time turners make you age that time which you travel. Albus and Scorpius should have become over a 120 years older.

Albus and Scorpius shouldn't have been able to see the Potter cottage due to fidelius charm.

The whole story is a plot hole

Cedric would never become a death eater under any circumstances.

EXCEPT IMPERIO CIRCUMSTANCES >:) maybe

Time turners make you age that time which you travel. Albus and Scorpius should have become over a 120 years older.

LOLOOOOOOOOL

I already explained the characters acting different as a result of changing time. If you're talking about OOC moments before time was changed and after time was fixed, it's been 19 years after Deathly Hallows. People change over time. And there was EXTREMELY stressful events going on and that had been going on for quite a while now, and people tend to act different during such times. This isn't a plot-hole.

Obviously Cedric WOULD become a Death Eater under the right circumstances. You thinking he wouldn't isn't a plot-hole, it's showing that your personal opinion is wrong.

Time Turners don't age a person when in use. If a person STAYED in that time, then they would age normally, so if they had stayed in the past up to the present, then they would have aged. But they used it, went to the past, then returned to the future. Time went forward and back, not them. But even if that was the case, it was heavily implied, if not outright stated, that this wasn't a normal/properly made Time Turner. So that's not a plot-hole.

Albus and Scorpius knew where it was, so the Fidelius Charm didn't work. It only works if the person doesn't know where it is or if the Secret Keeper tells them. Not a plot-hole.

No, the story isn't a plot-hole. But even if it was, most, if not all stories have at least one plot-hole or two, and they're overlooked by audiences because it's accepted that sometimes stories make mistakes.

The time turner page states:

It is unknown what the effect of excessive Time-Turner use might produce. The user might still age while within an hour produced by the Time-Turner, and if so, then for wizards or witches such as Hermione, constant use might age them faster, adding days, weeks, or even months onto their internal chronological clock. It is also unknown how this applies to later on in life. If Hermione was perhaps a month older by using the Time-Turner during her third year[11], then biologically her seventeenth birthday might arrive a month earlier than her calendar birthdate might indicate, which might cause the Trace to have been lifted earlier as well.