All posts by Gearcyy

<p>Wov i wanst aware that pages has talk pages so thank you. We really have to sort these out fast. Fenrir was attacking people in his human form too.</p><p>
</p><p>Dumbledore: "Is it you, Fenrir?"</p><p>Greyback: "Yes. Pleased to see me, Albus?"</p><p>Dumbledore: "No, I cannot say that I am... Am I to take it that you are attacking even without the full moon now? This is most unusual... You have developed a taste for human flesh that cannot be satisfied once a month?"</p><p>
</p><p>This is from 6th book and he scarred bill when he was human. So he was attacking people at battle of hogwarts while he was human again. He clearly wasnt a werewolf during that battle</p><p>And levicorpus thing is just riddiculous. every magic can be verbal or nonverbal depending on users choice. Its name is levicorpus after all. Wikis page of levicorpus even says it can be both.</p>

<p>First of all @Dryadalis3 Hags are always mentioned through the series even we didnt saw one. Series explained to us that they eat children and we even heard stories (i guess from conpanian books) about a hag opens a club about changing the image of hags and tries to convince other hags stop eating children</p><p>Second, zombies are mentioned at second book while lochart bragging and then Rowling wrote an article on pottermore about this matter. She said zombies are american located aimless brain eater living deads and inferis are puppets of a wizard living deads.</p><p>You see we have even a little bit information on everything we heard but never on dwarfs. What the hell is a dwarf? middle earth race or something?</p>

<p>@Newt Strike is right. This is from an mugglenet interview:</p><p>MA: How did they figure out how to work the map?</p><p>JKR: Don't you — well. This is how I explained it to myself at the time, and this does sound glib. Don't you think it would be quite a Fred and Georgeish thing to say in jest, and then see this thing transform?</p><p>MA: Yeah.</p><p>JKR: Can't you just see them?</p><p>ES: But the exact word combination? Is that just a lot of luck, or Felix Felicis —</p><p>JKR: Or, the map helped.</p><p>MA: Yep, yeah. You can see them sort of answering and joking with each other —</p><p>JKR: And the map flickering into life here and there when they got closer and closer, and finally they hit upon the exact right word combination and it just erupts.</p><p>
</p><p>And Fred-george find the map on a drawer marked "Confiscated and Highly Dangerous". So they of course choose it to take.</p>

<p>As far as i know Noble collection is the official supplier for Warner bros. Which means universal studios and WB studio tour has noble collection wands with differant box style.</p>

<p>Even though he was using his dad's wand, wand should have obey neville since wand given to him with something like permission. Yes it would be better for him if another wand chose him but this way is not useless either. In pottermore ollivanders says 'wand chosing the wizard method' is his preferance so that mean other wand sellers might not using it. Usinga wand who didnt chose you has to be ok even if it is not perfect.</p>

<p>@LachyBoi In Fantastic Beasts Crimes of Grindelwald, Newt summoned his niffler by saying 'accio niffler'. I chacked it from screenplay. So i guess Rowling changed her mind about this and it is a good decision if we look all the examples.</p>

<p>I tried to craft an argument over what we saw in hp books and then you came with cursed child material, 'It did happen'. How in the world someone who wants immortality has to do anything with heir. Immortality is againest the logic of heirs. 'Voldemort cant have a chield' might be my personal thinking that we cant accept or deny but heir thing is solidly absurd.</p>

<p>I would die if Rowling couldnt manage to tell the the story in her head. Like studio pressureing her to change somethings to conclude it shortly. I wishy she would write 3 long novels and be independant from studio. </p><p>And there has to be subtitled movies, its germany. My dream phd country :)</p><p>
</p>

<p>First of all, in Germany the only option is dubbed? Im in Turkey and in every cinema there is more subtitled options besides dubbed. </p><p>Second, you might be right. This series also has a profit margin from merchandises as well. They would definately do 3rd movie whether as final film or not But i really hope they at leats do 2 more movies even if they dont do 3. I would be very ok with 4 films in total espacially when i saw this 2nd movie that they literally conjured from air after 3 film plan.</p>

<p>Your discussion material cant be 'it did happen' while im talking about why it shouldnt happen. Im saying 'Voldemort wanting a heir doesnt make sense to me so I dont consider these canon and he doesnt have a chield' and youre saying 'Obvıosly he wanted since he had a child'. This is a dilemma and we cant argue over it. You can accept this book as canon but im not accepting and frankly some strangers who didnt understand wizarding world at all writing it makes my job easier. If it would be all-Rowling work I wouldnt be able to reject it in my head.</p>

<p>The profit was very very low. I dont know about these theories but this gives me worries too.</p>

<p>He would never want someone continue his legacy because he would never want to leave his legacy. His dream is immortality. This means no heir needed or wanted. And patronus example was arbitrary, i was talking about his doings on his soul and body. He shattered his soul literally and his body suffered from it(deformations). Im not even mentioning him dying and making a new body with magic. These doings cost voldemort so much as always dumbledore said. I dont think he would be able to give life to a child.</p>

<p>Yeah but people believes they have the risk of cancellation.</p>

<p>@Darrell Malik Did you read the books. Im just curios. Did voldemort seemed like a person who would want a child to you? Or someone who would want to do sex? Or someone who wont use lets say condom spell even if he want to do sex? Or do you think he is able to produce a child after what he had done to himself. Personally I think voldemort would never want a child or heir since he wants immortality, And he would never let someone to get close to his holy body. He would definately used some spell to remove his desires if even have sex desires. And we dont even know if he can produce a patronus. So him producing a child seems weird. We dont hate delphine because we dont even recognise her existence.</p>

<p>@MagnificMagnus Honestly no :) Crimes of grindelwald was a more complicated case. It was below JKR standards, yes. It was unnecesarry, yes the important parts could be easily fit other movies. It was below its potential, yes. Some points makes us confused, yes. Story didn't prgress, yes. But none of the characters ruined (even queene) and we get to know and love our characters more. Story was fun to follow. Our questions about canon and details can be removed with answers from Rowling. Those Mggonagall, brother, blood pact things probably has their solid explenations. As someone who wants many wizarding world stories (only from JKR) as much as possible, I was happy with this film.</p>

<p>No he hasnt a dougther. Lets admit it people. None of us consider this canon. Only wiki considers this canon i guess but wiki considers hogwarts mistery canon too so...</p>

<p>Yeesss i forgot about that.Harry made threats to McGonagal about yarding the ministry to the door of school. That was unforgivible to me. And the conversation between harry and dumbledore's portrait was really terrible too. It destroyed whole relationship. This book is the biggest mistake of rowling and ı would never expected such thing from her.</p>