Are there any graphic novel adaptations of the Harry Potter books? Whenever I try to find any all I can find are the Jim Kay illustrated books.
22,002
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Dragoneyes618
Neville and Luna. Nothing against Hannah, but Luna and Neville had so much chemistry. I don't think Hannah and Neville ever even canonically interact. I assume they must have, since they were in the same grade for seven years, had classes together, and eventually got married, but it's never shown. So I like Neville and Luna better. Hannah can marry Rolf Scamander. XD
Sirius
Harry
70 Votes in Poll
Since James and Lily had Harry when they were like 20 and then Harry and Ginny had James Sirius when they were 23 and 22 (if I've calculated correctly) then if their kids follow in their parents' and grandparents' footsteps it's quite possible.
The kid is considered a Muggleborn
The kid is counted as a pureblood, if both parents
The kid is considered a half-blood
51 Votes in Poll
Gryffindor
Slytherin
Hufflepuff
Ravenclaw
38 Votes in Poll
Maybe there was a basement? And the kitchen was in the basement for some reason?
Luna Lovegood/Neville Longbottom
Luna Lovegood/Rolf Scamander
45 Votes in Poll
Did Credence ever find out that Graves was actually Grindelwald?
@Forty third as myself Well, he does show up in the seventh book.
What would Grindelwald's boggart be?
Magical blood is genetic, hereditary. Magical parents almost always have magical children; even Muggle-borns have Squibs somewhere in their ancestry, meaning their ancestors were witches and wizards.
Therefore, then, I would think that when one parent has magic and the other is a Muggle, the chances of each child having magic are fifty percent.
Yet, magicless children of such unions are called Squibs. Dolores Umbridge had a Muggle mother and a wizard father; she had magic, her brother did not. Gilderoy Lockhart had a Muggle father and a witch mother; he had magic, but neither of his two sisters did. They are called Squibs, and often looked down upon by their magical parent and sibling.
But I don't see why; if Squibs are born to magical parents, and Muggle-borns to Muggles, but usually magical to magical and Muggle to Muggle, surely children born to one of each wouldn't necessarily be considered automatically magical, and thus be Squibs if it turns out they don't have magic? If they don't have magic, then it's simply that they took after their Muggle parent.
Voldemort. The terrible things the others did were all in his name.
Take Bellatrix, for example - if there had been no Voldemort, odds are that she would have been quite an unpleasant person anyway, but she wouldn't have been torturing and murdering people to win the war, since there would be no war.
Baby Harry might have been lying there in the ruins of the house for a good few hours until Sirius found him, too.
Unfair question. ;)
Voldemort
Grindelwald
73 Votes in Poll
@Bridge15 Thank you!
"We all must face the choice between doing what is easy and what is right."
Or something along those lines. I remember Dumbledore saying something like this, but not which book/movie it was. Does anyone know?
Ron and Hermione were alive; Ginny's parents were alive; only Lily's middle name was after someone alive; every other name was after someone deceased. George had already named a son Fred. Percy had already named a daughter Molly. Harry wanted to remember his lost loved ones in his children. It's not like Ginny would have opposed that - remember "I care about Sirius as much as you do?"
The only one I found odd was Lily's middle name being Luna, when all the other names are after dead people, and there were so many more dead to remember. I read a fanfiction once where Lily's middle name was Nymphadora instead, and I like that headcanon.
That depends on whether he showed any signs of genuine remorse, whether he wanted to try to atone, whether he truly felt guilty and wanted to do anything he could to make amends somehow....
...and he didn't, did he?