All posts by Widelymisunderstood

Acient greek or maybe roaring 20's

Hermione would also have the support of her parents if she was a single mom. The child's grandparents could take care of the child while the mother (or the father, because there are single dads out there as well) is working, or they could always leave their child in daycare.

I feel that it would be better if they just hire a new professor. There's no need to bring Slughorn back. Well, for plot purposes, I suppose it might be necessary, but other wise, i think the school would benefit from hiring

a) someone who wasn't in school when Lily, James, Severus and the others were in school

b) either home-schooled or from a different English speaking country

idk but hufflepuff are boring

That is the biggest fish carp i have ever heard, seen, or read. Hufflepuffs are actually better than the other houses, because unlike the others, they accept everyone.

As a former Hufflepuff, I will not allow Hufflepuff slander on this thread 😤

I don't think severus ever liked teaching, so i'll go with Potioneer for Madam Pomfrey

You say decent, I say she was bad

really, it all comes down to different opinions

She was good in Aquaman. 

I absolutely hated her in Aquaman. And this was before I even knew who she was

sadly 😔

1. Book-canon is more canon than movie-canon will ever be

2. My damn god, i don't understand why you're still continuing with this argument when we've given you loads of information and what not

hm, nah, kreacher x sirius is superior 😌 /j

😔

*laughs*

I've seen things that I wish I could unsee and i could probably get you a list of hp ships that are worse or just as bad as that.

Where's the both option?

How about ✨ Minerva ✨

This is responding to Cosmic's post where they say "where's your proof" after Second British says "he and harry forgot Hermione was in there."

Chapter Ten, Halloween,

Harry and Ron overheard Parvati Patil telling her friend Lavender that Hermione was crying in the girls’ bathroom and wanted to be left alone. Ron looked still more awkward at this, but a moment later they had entered the Great Hall, where the Halloween decorations put Hermione out of their minds.

Okay, I was not expecting to be teleported to Twitter when I opened this thread, because, in all honesty, the entire argument over Dramione vs Romione being toxic gives off "I have nothing to do, so let's go attack people on Twitter over ships" vibes.

And to be honest, Cosmic, all of your "evidence" is from the movies and while they do count as canon (as well as the cursed child, which *makes weird noises* is uh, a good play, but seems more like she got most of it out of a fanfic ) the books were the first to be published, therefore, we're going to lean toward book-canon more than movie-canon because movie-canon has contradicted book-canon...well...multiple times.

I'm legit reading Prisoner of Azkaban and I can tell you right now that Ron never says "I haven't lost anything! Your cat killed him!" "Harry, you've seen the way that blood-thirsty beast of hers is always lurking about. And now Scabbers is gone!" That is a movie quote, not a book quote.

This is directly from Chapter 12, The Patronus, nearing the end of the chapter.

“LOOK!” he bellowed, striding over to Hermione’s table. “LOOK!” he yelled, shaking the sheets in her face.

“Ron, what —?”

“SCABBERS! LOOK! SCABBERS!”

Hermione was leaning away from Ron, looking utterly bewildered. Harry looked down at the sheet Ron was holding. There was something red on it. Something that looked horribly like —

“BLOOD!” Ron yelled into the stunned silence. “HE’S GONE! AND YOU KNOW WHAT WAS ON THE FLOOR?”

“N — no,” said Hermione in a trembling voice.

Ron threw something down onto Hermione’s rune translation. Hermione and Harry leaned forward. Lying on top of the weird, spiky shapes were several long, ginger cat hairs.

In Chapter 13, Gryffindor Versus Ravenclaw it says;

Ron was enraged that Hermione had never taken Crookshanks’s attempts to eat Scabbers seriously, hadn’t bothered to keep a close enough watch on him, and was still trying to pretend that Crookshanks was innocent by suggesting that Ron look for Scabbers under all the boys’ beds. Hermione, meanwhile, maintained fiercely that Ron had no proof that Crookshanks had eaten Scabbers, that the ginger hairs might have been there since Christmas, and that Ron had been prejudiced against her cat ever since Crookshanks had landed on Ron’s head in the Magical Menagerie.

Personally, Harry was sure that Crookshanks had eaten Scabbers, and when he tried to point out to Hermione that the evidence all pointed that way, she lost her temper with Harry too.

“Okay, side with Ron, I knew you would!” she said shrilly. “First the Firebolt, now Scabbers, everything’s my fault, isn’t it! Just leave me alone, Harry, I’ve got a lot of work to do!”

In Chapter 14, Snape's Grudge, Hermione says “Ron, I’m really, really sorry about Scabbers…” she sobbed.

Ron responds with, “Oh — well — he was old,” said Ron, looking thoroughly relieved that she had let go of him. “And he was a bit useless. You never know, Mum and Dad might get me an owl now.”

So, really, I beg of you, read the books before you get into an argument because using only the quotes from the movies is going to get you nowhere.

Lmao, i remember that for one of those i got Minerva for parental figure #1 and for parental figure #2 i got severus.

Aight, look, by the 1970's Dumbledore is older than Newt. He's like 105...maybe eight or something like that. Considering that he died at the age of 115, and Bathilda was much much older than Albus and she didn't die until the late 1990s. We know that wizards live much longer than muggles, so it would make sense Newt was still alive by the 1970s. Besides, in 1979 Newt was awarded an Order of Merlin, Second Class as well as a chocolate frog and in 1992, Newt authored the book A Children's Anthology of Monsters for younger readers. And considering Newt was still alive in 2017 and denied some rumors of him being sent to NY to spy on the Magical US government and to find any new info on Grindelwald's whereabouts....

So, no, Newt did not die and no, he was not reincarnated into Liz. But that was a kinda cool theory.

Disney doesn't own HP and didn't make FB—

You're absolutely right, but there were multiple times when Disney tried to acquire the rights to Harry Potter. I believe Disney wanted to produce the HP movies but they didn't want to give creative liberties to Rowling, so Warner Brothers got the deal. And there was something about building a small HP area in the Disney World park, but what Disney was offering was rejected by Rowling multiple times and that deal went to Universal Studios instead. There are various articles explaining Disney's attempts to buy HP and even some videos on Youtube if you want to learn more.

In all honesty, I liked both Johnny and Mads take on Gellert, and I was pissed off when Warners just removed him from FB. But honestly, my answer depends on my mood. One day I'd say Mads, and the next day, Johnny.

(I might be one of the few people who prefer the 2005 remake over the 70s version. also, it's funny how Roald Dahl hated the '70s version of Willy Wonka and disowned the movie while a lot of people prefer it to the 2005 remake which is closer to the book than the '70s version. also, how many of you knew that Charlie was supposed to be black?)