All posts by Infinity75

Yes, like all the created tools necessary for life as it is today rolled into the wand.

Also, Dumbledore and Harry are quite powerful wizards anyway.

Excuse me? They channel their power and are much better than wandless magic, not to mention it's heavily difficult to cast and control magic without a wand. The thing with Fawkes was Fawkes, not Dumbledore, and children have trouble controlling their magic, wands heavily channel and amplify magic, so questioning their need seems unusual to me.

I'd suggest this is locked, but I see your reasons. I'm officially leaving this debate (and the discussion in general, a choice I made a while back) as of now, so happy locking or debating or whatever.

Besides the toxicity flying around?

I don't get why you back Snape so much, being so toxic about in parts like So when you say "Snape fought back", you say it like Snape isn't allowed to stand up for himself just because your hatred for him is so strong that you make excuses to make James look good by saying. Seriously, and sure, she insulted Snape by bringing up a name that arose in the rivalry he had with James, but I don't think that's nearly as bad as calling her a Mudblood. Lily chooses who she gives "free passes" to, and while Petunia was bad, too, Lily chose to forgive her, she has all the right, I don't know why you have to breathe down the necks of anyone who doesn't like Snape as much as you do and have started targeting anyone Snape was mean to and turning it on them while painting him out to be a great hero.

I hate that kind of logic, not proving them wrong but just bringing up another point in an attempt to say you're right, but Snape had no right to insult her, she had the right to not forgive him. She's not a hypocrite, she didn't insult Petunia or Snape, she has the right to forgive and not forgive whoever she wants to, and Petunia's her sister, anyway.

Excuse me?

Yes.

Oh, okay, never mind.

You just commented.

No, I wouldn't call them out for it, sorry, you weren't.

I think this was an exaggeration, it's commonly said like this usage, and while it is incorrect and a hyperbole, I wouldn't attack them over it.

^^Dramione does that indeed.

Also, explain the "Mars." I saw this random joke about Draco trying to build a rocket ship to Mars but don't understand why it says Mars.

This is why Dramione makes no sense.

I'd just like to address that Harry Potter magic bypasses the resistance demigods have, it's not a thin layer, focused on a target with a jet of energy and can harm them without directly enchanting the target, also just a different magic in general, so it doesn't fully apply.

That one image made people consider Dramione valid, but I say this does need a Dramione trigger warning. Things like this are the only reason it still exists.

It's just under a week since I posted, even if this was the RRW it'd be fine.

And I thought that I was a grammar freak...

Well, that's like me saying Nioc.

I'm not trying to be mean, just saying that if she's your favorite...

She's great, no offense, but if you want to name her as your favorite, it's Hermione.