Talk: Disowned members of the House of Black

This is the talk page for the category "Disowned members of the House of Black".

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the category, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Weasley family[]

The Weasleys are descendants of the House of Black. They are also disowned members of the House of Black. So I think not only Arthur and his brothers belong to this category, but also Arthur's children and grandchildren and the son of one of Arthur's brothers. Or am I wrong with that? Or would it be better to make a "Category:Disowned members of the House of Black descendants"? Harry granger Talk contribs 19:51, October 4, 2017 (UTC)

Technically, Arthur and his brothers and their children aren't disowned. Only Cedrella is. Arthur and his brother's don't appear on the tree at all due to their mother's disownment but are NOT technically disowned at all. HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 20:33, October 4, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, that would be an argument against the "Category:Disowned members of the House of Black". But they could belong into a new "Category:Disowned members of the House of Black descendants". Harry granger Talk contribs 20:37, October 4, 2017 (UTC)

Well, whether they're disowned or not, they are still descendants of the family, so is the disowned part needed? HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 20:45, October 4, 2017 (UTC)