Given the fact we have created many family articles, wouldn´t a family infobox be appropriate?
It would include:
Name= Image= "Family tree, one or several family members" Relationships= "Related family" Blood status= "Muggle, pure-blood, half-breed or both magical and muggle Status= "Extant or extinct" House(s)= "Hogwarts houses the family members were Sorted in"
What do you think? Any ideas for the colours?--Rodolphus 09:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm.....not bad. I'd like it. ShirleyA
(The Quibbler) 10:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Are there any other opinions? --Rodolphus 15:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Deaths in family. I Say it should be Light Blue for a the colour --Bongo2009 
15:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Good idea. But I don´t know how to create an infobox myself.--Rodolphus 15:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Me neither, best asking one of the Admins --Bongo2009 15:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Check this out. What do you think? -- Seth Cooper owl post! 11:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
The content is good, but it is a bit dark, isn´t it?--Rodolphus 13:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- So would we use this infobox on family pages like "Potter"? It's a agood idea, just a couple of questions thopugh: What's the difference between "family heritage" and "relationships". Don't you think it might be a bit hard to fit the family tree into a standard 250 px for the infobox? It is a little dark, yes, and don't forget that we don't want the infobox to contain too much and be too big. It should be good though! --Margiechocoholic
Owl me! 06:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- So would we use this infobox on family pages like "Potter"? It's a agood idea, just a couple of questions thopugh: What's the difference between "family heritage" and "relationships". Don't you think it might be a bit hard to fit the family tree into a standard 250 px for the infobox? It is a little dark, yes, and don't forget that we don't want the infobox to contain too much and be too big. It should be good though! --Margiechocoholic
