FANDOM


Shortcut:
HPW:RFP

This page is used to request various levels of user access. See archives 1, 2, and history for old requests.

Archives
File-manager.png
  • Archive 1 (24 August 2007 to 31 October 2010)
  • Archive 2 (31 October 2010 to 10 April 2020)

Chat Mods

Rollback

These users are able to quickly revert vandalism.

Content Moderator

Bot

Administrator

These users are able to delete and protect pages along with blocking users.

Harry granger

Considering that we've long been operating with very few administators, and after discussing it with Ironyak1, we've thought it wise to look into some old, trusted users as potential new administrators. This is the first of potentially a few more nominations in the near future.

I am therefore nominating Harry granger for admin privileges. Harry granger has long been a member of this community (just past his 10th year with us) and in that time has made extensive contributions to the wiki, showing great passion, civility, and has consistently shown to be a great person to work with. He has also been a Rollback for many, many years.

Normal Voting Policy applies. Only votes from autoconfirmed registered users with greater than 20 article edits will be tallied. Please ask any questions you may have and then vote FOR or AGAINST this nomination. If there is no clear For majority, voting will be closed when the allotted time (1 week) has expired, with no changes taking place. Alloted time may be extended as needed, if any issues under discussion so warrant it. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 22:58, May 20, 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

For (+8)

  1. I am totally for this nomination. Harry granger is a long time member of this site and always tried to help me when I asked, so I would say that he is probably one of the best candidates this wiki has to offer. Cheers,  Harrypotterexpert101  Talk     Council-icon-FANDOM.svg GDM.svg 23:26, May 20, 2020 (UTC)
  2. I have rarely had any interactions with Harry Granger(HG) but I see they like Hermoine a lot have adopted her surname, so I am all in favour. Jokes aside, HG has been editing this wiki for a very long time. The 19k+ edits by them have helped this wiki to be a better place. Their contributions are an inspiration to many new editors. I wish them luck. FOR Reverb frost (talk) 02:28, May 21, 2020 (UTC)
  3. --Rodolphus (talk) 09:19, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
  4. I don't know you much but hopefully you would be a fair admin to all of us. So, I'm For this nomination.  Newt Strike   Talk   Contribs 10:22, May 24, 2020 (UTC)\
  5. For- @Foxes321 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Foxes321 (talkcontribs).Does not meet HPW:VP criteria. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:08, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
  6. I agree with Newt Strike, and I don't know any things if you pick Harry Granger as a candidate from friendships or other reasons, but I hope you'll be fair and select more candidates, just not only the one that helps you but for the entire Harry Potter wiki. For! Cheers~~~~ Secretspyer
  7. For - They look like a smart user with keen leadership skills. I don't see why not. --BabyIntelligence4ever (talk) 05:47, May 25, 2020 (UTC) Does not meet HPW:VP criteria. --Ironyak1 (talk) 21:25, May 25, 2020 (UTC)
  8. Harry granger has always been a friendly and valuable contributor - having their help as an admin would be very welcome! --Ironyak1 (talk) 21:25, May 25, 2020 (UTC)
  9. For I haven't had any personal interactionw ith him before. I looked at their contributions and I think they are valuable to the admin team. MechQueste 21:34, May 25, 2020 (UTC)
  10. For. Harry granger has been a valuable editor to the wiki, and I would welcome their help as admin! - Kates39 (talk) 10:45, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

Against (-0)


Rodolphus

It's my honor and a privilege to nominate Rodolphus to be an administrator. This is something I consider long over due, as his first of over 17,000 edits was back on Hallowe'en 2007 (!) and he has shown himself to be a clear and consistent help for these many years. Some of my earliest discussions on the wiki were with Rodolphus about the Timeline articles and references and in every interaction I've seen since, he's always been helpful, even-tempered, and reliable in upholding the policies and standards of the wiki.

Please ask any questions you may have and then vote FOR or AGAINST this nomination.

Per the Voting Policy, only votes from autoconfirmed registered users with more than 20 article edits will be tallied, although everyone is welcome to ask questions or offer their feedback. This vote will remain open until all Q & A has been resolved and voting has largely ceased. This will take at least one week, but may be extended as needed. --Ironyak1 (talk) 09:12, May 24, 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

For (+6)

  1. For. I already wondered as why Rodolphus was not an admin in the first place. In fact, I suggested them to stand for adminship some day. I'm glad they already got the nomination. Hope you will bring justice to this place.  Newt Strike   Talk   Contribs 10:22, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
  2. For. For all above stated reasons and more, it was one of the first people that crossed my mind as a potential new admin. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:04, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
  3. For. Rodulphus seems to have a good grasp on how this wiki works and has been a good contributor here for a while, so I think that he would be an amazing candidate for adminship. Cheers,  Harrypotterexpert101  Talk     Council-icon-FANDOM.svg GDM.svg 17:28, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
  4. For Rodolphus is a good editor and as far as I know from another wiki also a fair admin. So he gets my "Yes".  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 19:22, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
  5. For Good editor. MechQueste 21:35, May 25, 2020 (UTC)
  6. For Rodolphus has been a very valuable, long-standing editor and has always been helpful and fair. I can't think of anyone better to be an admin! - Kates39 (talk) 10:33, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

Against (-0)


SWLover2

I feel confident in my decision to nominate SWLover2 to be an admin. I feel this has actually been coming to her for a long time, she's well on her way to 2,000 edits and is always very discrete, eloquent, and insightful. I know her personally because we interact on D.I.T. Wiki and I can assure you she's the wittiest, smartest, and most charming 20-year-old I've ever interacted with. She also has some extremely good points about the Potterverse that goes to show just how insightful and passionate she really is. Okay, maybe she's a little cray-cray, but nobody's perfect. (Except maybe Will Smith, maybe he really is flawless....) A stern and righteously aggressive yet fair and extremely tactful leader, this girl has done a great job at upholding the policies and standards of D.I.T. Wiki and seems more than capable of reliably guiding this one to prosperity.

Please ask any questions you may have and then vote FOR or AGAINST this nomination. --BabyIntelligence4ever (talk) 05:47, May 25, 2020 (UTC)

No vote has been opened for this individual, but if they want to express an interest in these extra permissions then it can be discussed. Cheers --Ironyak1 (talk) 21:25, May 25, 2020 (UTC)

RedWizard98

I would also like to with confidence nominate the one and only RedWizard98 to be an admin. He actually reminds me a lot of the other person I nominated, despite not knowing him anywhere near as well. He has a lot of intellect and intuition and practically secretes passion. I believe this man can bring Harry Potter Wiki the leadership it deserves.

Please ask any questions you may have and then vote FOR or AGAINST this nomination. --BabyIntelligence4ever (talk) 05:47, May 25, 2020 (UTC)

No vote has been opened for this individual, but if they want to express an interest in these extra permissions then it can be discussed. Cheers --Ironyak1 (talk) 21:25, May 25, 2020 (UTC)

Bureaucrat

These users are able to grant and remove adminship, and grant and remove rollback privileges.

Discussions Moderator

See also

*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+