No edit summary |
Newt Strike (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
# I have rarely had any interactions with Harry Granger(HG) but I see they like Hermoine a lot have adopted her surname, so I am all in favour. Jokes aside, HG has been editing this wiki for a very long time. The 19k+ edits by them have helped this wiki to be a better place. Their contributions are an inspiration to many new editors. I wish them luck. '''FOR''' [[User:Reverb frost|Reverb frost]] ([[User talk:Reverb frost|talk]]) 02:28, May 21, 2020 (UTC) |
# I have rarely had any interactions with Harry Granger(HG) but I see they like Hermoine a lot have adopted her surname, so I am all in favour. Jokes aside, HG has been editing this wiki for a very long time. The 19k+ edits by them have helped this wiki to be a better place. Their contributions are an inspiration to many new editors. I wish them luck. '''FOR''' [[User:Reverb frost|Reverb frost]] ([[User talk:Reverb frost|talk]]) 02:28, May 21, 2020 (UTC) |
||
#--[[User:Rodolphus|Rodolphus]] ([[User talk:Rodolphus|talk]]) 09:19, May 24, 2020 (UTC) |
#--[[User:Rodolphus|Rodolphus]] ([[User talk:Rodolphus|talk]]) 09:19, May 24, 2020 (UTC) |
||
+ | # I don't know you much but hopefully you would be a fair admin to all of us. So, I'm '''For''' this nomination. |
||
====Against (-0)==== |
====Against (-0)==== |
||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
====For (+0)==== |
====For (+0)==== |
||
+ | |||
+ | #For. I already wondered as why Rodolphus was not an admin in the first place. In fact, I suggested them to stand for adminship some day. I'm glad they already got the nomination. Hope you will bring justice to this place. |
||
====Against (-0)==== |
====Against (-0)==== |
Revision as of 10:20, 24 May 2020
This page is used to request various levels of user access. See archives 1, 2, and history for old requests.
Chat Mods
Rollback
These users are able to quickly revert vandalism.
Content Moderator
Bot
Administrator
These users are able to delete and protect pages along with blocking users.
Harry granger
Considering that we've long been operating with very few administators, and after discussing it with Ironyak1, we've thought it wise to look into some old, trusted users as potential new administrators. This is the first of potentially a few more nominations in the near future.
I am therefore nominating Harry granger for admin privileges. Harry granger has long been a member of this community (just past his 10th year with us) and in that time has made extensive contributions to the wiki, showing great passion, civility, and has consistently shown to be a great person to work with. He has also been a Rollback for many, many years.
Normal Voting Policy applies. Only votes from autoconfirmed registered users with greater than 20 article edits will be tallied. Please ask any questions you may have and then vote FOR or AGAINST this nomination. If there is no clear For majority, voting will be closed when the allotted time (1 week) has expired, with no changes taking place. Alloted time may be extended as needed, if any issues under discussion so warrant it. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 22:58, May 20, 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
For (+3)
- I am totally for this nomination. Harry granger is a long time member of this site and always tried to help me when I asked, so I would say that he is probably one of the best candidates this wiki has to offer. Cheers, Harrypotterexpert101 Talk 23:26, May 20, 2020 (UTC)
- I have rarely had any interactions with Harry Granger(HG) but I see they like Hermoine a lot have adopted her surname, so I am all in favour. Jokes aside, HG has been editing this wiki for a very long time. The 19k+ edits by them have helped this wiki to be a better place. Their contributions are an inspiration to many new editors. I wish them luck. FOR Reverb frost (talk) 02:28, May 21, 2020 (UTC)
- --Rodolphus (talk) 09:19, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know you much but hopefully you would be a fair admin to all of us. So, I'm For this nomination.
Against (-0)
Rodolphus
It's my honor and a privilege to nominate Rodolphus to be an administrator. This is something I consider long over due, as his first of over 17,000 edits was back on Hallowe'en 2007 (!) and he has shown himself to be a clear and consistent help for these many years. Some of my earliest discussions on the wiki were with Rodolphus about the Timeline articles and references and in every interaction I've seen since, he's always been helpful, even-tempered, and reliable in upholding the policies and standards of the wiki.
Please ask any questions you may have and then vote FOR or AGAINST this nomination.
Per the Voting Policy, only votes from autoconfirmed registered users with more than 20 article edits will be tallied, although everyone is welcome to ask questions or offer their feedback. This vote will remain open until all Q & A has been resolved and voting has largely ceased. This will take at least one week, but may be extended as needed. --Ironyak1 (talk) 09:12, May 24, 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
For (+0)
- For. I already wondered as why Rodolphus was not an admin in the first place. In fact, I suggested them to stand for adminship some day. I'm glad they already got the nomination. Hope you will bring justice to this place.
Against (-0)
Bureaucrat
These users are able to grant and remove adminship, and grant and remove rollback privileges.