I've looked over this article to see what could be done to helpfully expand it, but it doesn't seem like much can be done. --Parodist 11:16, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
This is untrue. Disowned persons have got their souses' names. I don't know why there is no name of Ted Tonks on Andromeda's scroll. In the film there were numerous mistakes: there is no picture of Cygnus I, Regulus looks like a man, Lycoris like a man, Walburga isn't related to her father Pollux, there is no Bellatrix's picture, there is no Draco's picture, Phineas became "Phineus", Arcturus "Arctorus". So, I think this article must have section "Behind the scenes".--Lord 20:01, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- You have got it wrong. On the family tree Rowling drew, no spouses names were included. Also, the disowned person's name was burned out too (they were only named on a key). -- Seth Cooper owl post! 21:28, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
OK, but what with mistakes?--Lord 09:50, October 13, 2009 (UTC)
Cumberbatch?![]
WHY IS B. CUMBERBATCH ON THE TAPESTRY?! File:Tumblr_ml7bxedu3H1qjhu5fo1_500.jpg Shocked. AB Ng Talk 08:41, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
It's made up - nearly all the names in that picture do not appear in the film -- or the tree provided by Rowling. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 15:19, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
Description[]
Shouldn't the description section be amended? It describes the movie tree rather than the one from the Order of the Phoenix novel which is merely stated to have births and deaths, and links marriage and offspring via (gold) threads rather than scrolls with names and partners in them? The tree's appearance in the movie should be in the Behind the Scenes section.Miraitrunks766 (talk) 05:50, September 22, 2018 (UTC)