Talk: Lee Jordan

Picture

Honestly, I understand this the most recent picture of "Lee," but it looks kind of ridiculous. Wouldn't a picture of the real Luke Youngblood look better, even if it's slightly out of date? EmmyG 00:16, October 11, 2010 (UTC)

You are right; infobox pictures should be from the most recent publication. You are also right; an actual photo would look better. Sadly, rules are rules and the picture remains... DisturbedLemon 05:43, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

They really do need a new picture of Lee from the movie 64.83.227.171 02:10, June 16, 2012 (UTC) 21:10, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you three this is a joke so many cartoon main pictures Joe.Blanchard4 02:12, June 16, 2012 (UTC) 02:12, June 16, 2012 (UTC)

Me too, they use the movie images for so many other pages, yet for this one, it's like this.

Mr9174 (talk) 00:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Deathly Hallows

Can anyone who has seen the movie confirm whether or not Lee Jordan was at the wedding and if it was an "unknown" actor playing him? I've found a few sites saying that he would be back for Deathly Hallows 2, but can't find anything saying that either Lee was in Part 1 or that Luke acted in Part 1.....--BachLynn^(Accio!) 14:59, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

O.W.L.?

Where does it say that Jordan earned an O.W.L.? (Just for confirmation.) Dr. Galenos (talk) 04:03, January 21, 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure. As far as I can tell, neither Goblet of Fire nor Order of the Phoenix contain any mention I can find of Lee taking N.E.W.T. level Charms. User:Misskatniss1546 has been adding a lot of unsourced information like this to various pages, I'll leave her a message indicating that she needs to start citing her sources. -- 1337star ^{(Drop me a line!)} 06:50, January 21, 2014 (UTC)

Two Things

1. I'm sorry for rule-breaking, but I love it when Lee makes a biased comment during commentating of games. :)
2. That picture looks edited, like someone took a photo of Lee, a photo of a room, and put them together. Is it?

Best wishes,

Llama llama llama! (talk) 05:16, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

No, it is from the fifth video game.--Rodolphus (talk) 07:08, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

In that case, no wonder it looks edited. Llama llama llama! (talk) 21:42, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

Date

Pottermore says he was born in c. 1978. Circa means we can't exclude that he was born in the late months of 1977. Otherwise, the c. wouldn't be on Pottermore.--Rodolphus (talk) 12:07, October 13, 2017 (UTC)

It does, actually. If it was 1977, it would say c.1977/1978. It doesn't - so 1978 is the date. HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 12:45, October 13, 2017 (UTC)

Circa is a term that means "about", so late 1977 is included in the wording without an extra mention. If it was excactly 1978 for sure, it would list 1978 without the c. as far as I know--Rodolphus (talk) 14:09, October 13, 2017 (UTC)

And yet Pottermore - the second highest tier of canon - does not feature "77" in anyway - so if you're ignoring that, you're ignoring canon. HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 14:40, October 13, 2017 (UTC)

Pottermore does not exclude the possibility that he was born in late 1977. By writing c. Pottermore includes the possibility. Writing c. means "born in 1978 or shortly before."--Rodolphus (talk) 14:46, October 13, 2017 (UTC)

Well, given that c. means "approximately" and not "before", it's implying 1978. HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 15:11, October 13, 2017 (UTC)

What Rodolphus said is correct. It is most likely that he was born in 1978, but the possibility of him being born in late 1977 is not completely ruled out. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 08:10, October 15, 2017 (UTC)

Infobox image

I propose for the infobox image to be changed into an image of Luke Youngblood from the film. The current image looks ridiculous, and surely not what the article readers expect. Thoughts? - Peregino (talk) 14:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Also, if anyone is going to claim that we use the most recent image on the infobox, please don't. We DO NOT have a silly policy like that. Thanks. - Peregino (talk) 14:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Bump. - Peregino (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

I would support an image from the films of Luke Youngblood since it's a higher tier canon than the games. Are there any suitable candidates? AD Vortigern (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Candidate A

Candidate B

Candidate C

Maybe this one? - Peregino (talk) 00:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

I think I like Option A the most. Its higher canon, (tier 2 vs tier 3), and it is the most familiar (to the wider audience).SeichanGrey (talk) 01:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

I prefer the current one. Castlemore (talk) 01:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

I prefer Candidate A. We do generally prefer live-action portrayals. MalchonC (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

I say Candidate A.(GoldenOath20 (talk) 04:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC))

Is there a more front face image of Luke Youngblood as Lee Jordan? Image A is fine, but I'd like one looking front.  Silver  Discusión  18:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

@JLSilver I just added another candidate above. It's the only image of Lee's (portrayed by Luke) front face that I could find, and I'm sorry that the face looks a bit funny... By the way, I would vote for Candidate A. - Peregino (talk) 01:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

@Peregino, after several of us said we preferred Candidate A, you just went and replaced Candidate A with a different image? Can you not see how this is inappropriate? The one we liked is the old Candidate A, not whatever you decided to replace it with. It's silently altering the context of our opinions without our approval. This is a discussion about the infobox image, every difference in facial expression matters. Even if on other occasions you can perhaps replace the image, when it's used as a candidate in such discussion, it should not be. Please don't do things like this in the future, I've reverted Candidate A back to what we actually "voted" for. MalchonC (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry. My intention was to make the image clearer and better-looking, but I forgot to think about the impact on this voting discussion. This is my mistake, and I will not let it happen again. - Peregino (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

@Peregino Please adhere to your own post and "say what you mean and mean what you say" (i.e. STICK WITH Candidate A if you and everyone else agree upon it). Otherwise don't create polls like this in the first place. Thank you. -
 Delaney Wang  Talk  Activity  03:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, that's enough with that already. I'm sure Peregino understands it by now without needing your aggressive message. MalchonC (talk) 03:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from exhibiting behaviour that conveys aggression. I am now fully aware of my mistake and have duly addressed it. Furthermore, I would appreciate it if you could cease adding superfluous elements (e.g. bold text, underlining, striking out, EXCESSIVE CAPITALISATION, text colouring, etc.) in your messages as they make the text cumbersome and somewhat irksome to read. Thank you. - Peregino (talk) 04:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, did not intend for the above message to come off as aggressive. Also, referring to "text colouring", my signature is actually already designed that way via my preferences settings -
 Delaney Wang  Talk  Activity  05:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

When I said text colouring, I was referring to something like these: 123456789. You really need to fix your messaging style, as most of them turns out like this: Hello, I am PEREGINO; and it is very difficult to read. Thanks for your understanding. - Peregino (talk) 05:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Also, you're still going for Candidate A, right? - Peregino (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok, that page has been revised, but to me I see green as "right" and red as "wrong" just so you know. As for your poll here, I can't vote on it anymore as MalchonC has already considered it closed, but I nevertheless will still share my opinion that yes, I'm going with Candidate A. -
 Delaney Wang  Talk  Activity  06:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Delaney, I didn't (and can't) restrict you from colouring your texts. I just advised you to do it less so that your messages can be easier to read. Also, the vote isn't closed. - Peregino (talk) 06:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, from where did you get that the discussion was closed? If you meant the "that's enough with that already", that was referring to the unnecessary aggression alone. MalchonC (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

With 1 vote (from Castlemore) for the current one, 6 votes for Candidate A (from SeichanGrey, MalchonC, GoldenOath20, JLSilver, Peregino, and Delaney Wang), and 0 vote for Candidate B and C, I think we have the winner. Thanks everyone for participating in this discussion. :D - Peregino (talk) 06:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, the majority opinion is very clear in this case. We don't need a formal vote then, do we? MalchonC (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Also, as I said here, please don't use the word "vote" when writing a formal note in the article, it has a specific meaning on HPW which means a formal vote conducted by an admin, as detailed in HPW:VP. What we did here was not a vote, it was merely a discussion that had a clear majority opinion. MalchonC (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

@MalchonC, From my point of view as this discussion being closed, I was referring to this message: "@Peregino, after several of us said we preferred Candidate A, you just went and replaced Candidate A with a different image? Can you not see how this is inappropriate? The one we liked is the old Candidate A, not whatever you decided to replace it with. It's silently altering the context of our opinions without our approval. This is a discussion about the infobox image, every difference in facial expression matters. Even if on other occasions you can perhaps replace the image, when it's used as a candidate in such discussion, it should not be. Please don't do things like this in the future, I've reverted Candidate A back to what we actually "voted" for.", so that's probably how I interpreted this topic as "closed" in conclusion. -
 Delaney Wang  Talk  Activity  07:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)