Notability[]
Is it wiki standard to make a page for such a minor object? Does this actually warrant a page of its own? (IDK I'm new to editing here) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pleasenotme (talk • contribs).
- I personally have the same reservations. The notability guidelines doesn't talk about objects other than wands (needs reviewing I guess), and I think covering all dress robes in the Dress robes article is already sufficient. MalchonC (talk) 06:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Wait till you read the Bacon article or about the Father of boy who owned a magic hamster! In short, the allowed level of detail extends down to almost any canon mention of people, places, things, ideas, etc, so any of Category:Luna Lovegood's possessions are likely to have an article. Cheers --Ironyak1 (talk) 06:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- I also like there being articles for all manner of items in the Harry Potter universe. I think they are all definitely notable and worthy of inclusion. RedWizard98 (talk) 15:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)