I understand the reasoning behind the removal of Category:Muggles. But since the article is related to Muggles, couldn't it be included? Or is that category only for people? --Cubs Fan2007 04:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

How about creating a new category called Category:Muggle-baiting? This is the term that Arthur Weasley used to refer to the type of pranks that wizards play on Muggles (Chamber of Secrets, Chapter 3). In that case, he was referring to keys that wizards enchanted to shrink, so as to drive Muggles batty whenever they went to look for them. -Starstuff 09:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Sounds good. Or maybe Category:Articles related to Muggles; similar to the Horcrux category. --Cubs Fan2007 09:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I also considered a category patterned off the Horcrux one. But, a Muggle-baiting category might be useful, if we created articles for muggle-baiting and shrinking keys. It wouldn't seem quite so empty that way. :) -Starstuff 10:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Aha, I see the logic behind that. All right, Muggle baiting sounds good. --Cubs Fan2007 14:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I've finally gotten around to creating the Muggle-baiting category and its articles. :) -Starstuff 11:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.