Harry Potter Wiki
Register
Advertisement
Harry Potter Wiki

Ok, I know this is real, but I placed a fact template on it because I want a link to the actual statement in the article. If anyone can source one, I'd be grateful since I don't have time at the moment. Many thanks. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 10:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, I found one. Template removed. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 07:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


June 2010?[]

  • Cries* I went to Disney World this year. I just read about this! Sure Disney World was awsome, but it must could've been more awesome (for me) with that!

I am kinda excited about it though. If I do go back to Disney World, I could see it! Anyone else excited about it?

Time frame[]

Events happenning at the WWHP are to be considered happenning when if no actual in-universe time frame is ever given? Present day? --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 22:14, January 27, 2010 (UTC)


Number of articles[]

I noticed that "Flight of the Hippogriff" and "Dragon Challenge" both have two separate articles, one with a (Wizarding World of Harry Potter Theme Park) disambiguation tag, and one without. Since it's about the same thing, is there really a need for two different articles? Since no other articles exist about these subjects, I don't think the parenthesis is necessary. I'm not quite sure what content to move, if any, or if the whole article can just be redirected. --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 18:10, February 25, 2010 (UTC)


I agree the duplicates should be removed BFG86 21:26, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Should be in Britan[]

Who agrees that America has just gone and stolen the credit by doing this. Those people just dont care about copyright and i hate them for it the parks a disgrace. Britan the rightful owners should have this not the RICH FAT GITS. Darth Rishda 21:22, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article, not your opinions on its subject. -- 1337star (Owl Post) 21:43, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Hollywood and Japan Versions[]

GSnitch This discussion is listed as an active talk page.
Please remove this template when the question has been answered.

The information of the Hollywood and Japan version could be expanded upon. There are no strings on me (talk) 22:47, April 6, 2016 (UTC)

[1] The Map has been updated. There are no strings on me (talk) 03:30, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

Bump, sort of. Don't remember if there's a discussion somewhere, so figured will just place it here since it's sort of related. Like, would HPW cover it like Wikipedia where there's ATM 4 separate articles, and one looks to be scheduled for creation eventually?
My first knee-jerk reaction was "duh, HPW's got to be more detailed than the general wiki, right?" But then, I'm like, if all parks are relatively similar (I had thought there'd be more individuality) with only Orlando having a very visible exclusivity, having separate articles for each location to me then seem rather redundant, people are bound to feel a sense of deja vu if the pages all contains very similar content.
If this is agreed upon, then can this article be used as the general WWHP page? Yes, it does already cover stuff outside the Orlando one, but the intro is very specifically about this history of how it first existed in Orlando. The article also has notes on which location is also available elsewhere, but it isn't obvious at a glance, and some stuff feels a bit misleading (labeled to be Universal Studios Orlando only but not quite so, though this could simply be due to the article being out-of-date? unsure).
BTW, is there a reason why the article does not use the actual names listed on Universal's official sites? I can perhaps understand not feeling the need to include the various ™ that's part of a lot of the places, but intentionally matching canon name? "Three Broomsticks" is just listed as "Three Broomsticks™", not "Three Broomsticks Inn"? "Choir Performance"??? It's just listed as "Frog Choir"? And "Dance Performance"? Its description has it, it's called "Triwizard Spirit Rally", so why not use the official name first then describe what the thing is? I'm asking instead of changing, because I'm obviously fairly unfamiliar with this part of the fandom, so I don't know if there's some legit reason for the article to appear the way it currently is. --Sammm✦✧(talk) 10:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement