Before editing, be sure to read the wiki's policies, most notably the blog and image policies. Please sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to automatically produce your name and the current date. Be sure to verify your e-mail address in your preferences. Before attempting any major article rewrites please read the layout guide. If you have any questions, check out the policy and help pages (see here for editing help), add a question to the Community portal, view the forum or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
—ProfessorTofty 04:13, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! It seems you and I have a similar interest. I too have been working to remove the stub tag or categorisation from articles that don't need it. It seems to be on quite a few articles that are really quite fully-formed, or have subjects with only brief mentions in canon and therefore there really isn't anything else to be added. I've made a fair dent in getting rid of some of these, but I also usually like to do things such as adding sourcing when going in to remove it, so there's still quite a bit to be done. You may have noticed that we have different categories for different types of stubs, so feel free to dive in and keep removing it from any article you see that doesn't need it. 04:13, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
What was your second question???
What house are you in???
Prev Msg from TeddyBear303030
What house? Jhonevan's signature. 04:57, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
Ravenclaw, Gryffindor, Slytherin or Hufflepuff