Hey Tofty! I was wondering if you were still interested in talking with Bond. I'm sure he'd love to speak with you, but wanted to see you still interested. We all love this wiki over at our own :D Colin687

01:16, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry.. I will get a hold of him, and have him owl you :) ... fixed my sig Colin687

02:58, December 24, 2012 (UTC)Colin687

Happy Christmas!

Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar

Jingle Spells,

Jingle Spells,

Jingle All the Way!

Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar Gold taskstar
May you have a very Merry Christmas and may joy, peace, and prosperity be yours throughout the upcoming New Year of 2013. Yours, --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 03:32, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
I also wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Stay healthy and wealthy and tell your computer he has to work and not to sleep.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 13:08, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
That would be great. I did not the most there but I did it every day. And I was soooo alone, Hunnie Bunn is not there anymore and now has a new account, Robert Osbourne. He will give up Hunnie Bunn, then admin and bureaucrat are away, too. Then we two are alone on Potterpedia.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 18:53, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

Dumbledore's Army Roleplay Wiki

Hello. Colin said you were interested in our wiki, and that I should contact you, so I'm basically coming in blind, and just posting this message as a contact. I'm Bond_em7, and a Bcrat on the wiki, so let's talk and see what we can work up, or if you have any questions, feel free to ask, and I'll answer. {{SUBST:User:Bond_em7/sig}} 19:28, December 24, 2012 (UTC)


It's not me!! Someone must have got into it and uses it to vandalise. I have absolutely nothing to do with it. I was surprised when the Goblet-article was edited by this unregistered user. I promise 100% that I'm not the vandalizer. Someone may be doing this to prevent getting on better terms with you guys. I swear it isn't me! -- 21:31, December 28, 2012 (UTC)


Hello Professor. Is this a better idea than what was originally there? --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:59, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

I understand - I won't be entirely satisfied until we get a third opinion either, but I wanted to make sure that in the meantime you were content with that idea. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 00:13, December 29, 2012 (UTC)


Hi, Professor! Do you know MarauderCloak17128? I've made him friend to CauldronFirebolt3882, that's me. Now I have an account there, too. Perhaps you are interested.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 00:44, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Hi, have seen your adding. Perhaps we "see" us there.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 01:01, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
No, I looked onto your userpage here and saw that name. My question was a joke because I knew that it was you. I can understand that you only look when there are news. With more wikis you have a lot to do. I know this because I have also more wikis.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 01:06, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, that these locked items I've seen, too. That's a pity. Tell me when you have time. It's my first day today. I think you will win, but what the heck, everything's just a game.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 01:29, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, you're not the only one. Hunnie Bunn or Robert Osbourne is excited, too, and me of course. I hope they get me sorted soon.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 19:13, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Hufflepuff colleague. I'm sorted in this house, too.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 20:17, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Oh God, when duelling is so difficult like potion brewing then I am the greatest loser on the whole world.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 21:35, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Professor! Have you ever solved the chess game or the potions riddle in Pottermore? Must I do something in the chess game? Because: When I am on the potions riddle page I always get this silly sentence: To solve the puzzle you must select the two correct potions - but then the bottles vanish. What do I wrong? Hunnie Bunn tried already to help since it happens yesterday, but it happens today, too.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 20:04, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Pottermore Houses

I now officially feel excluded; you, Nick O'Demus and Harry granger are all Hufflepuff. Oh well, at least Seth's in Ravenclaw. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 20:21, December 29, 2012 (UTC)


No, actually - I suppose I place too much trust in FizzyBongs, who says they come from an interview. You'll have to ask her. By the way, I figured I'd ask whether it's all right for a name to have a drug reference - a 'bong' is a pipe used to smoke marijuana and other drugs, or so the "fizzy" part suggests. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 18:05, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Okay... should I ask her and see whether she can procure an acceptable source? And why, what does ATFM mean (I'm assuming it isn't the Robert part that's bad)?--Hunnie Bunn (talk) 18:13, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Featured articles

It´s good that we finally have new featured articles. Thanks. I´ve also nominated a few.--Rodolphus (talk) 18:08, December 30, 2012 (UTC)


Bongs posted to Harry granger's wall that it was from a podcast; I'm listening to the first part, and part two is here if you wanted to check it out before I got there. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 18:33, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Sadly enough, I do, and it turns out that FizzyBongs must have either meant a different interview or have made a mistake - PotterCast 130 and PotterCast 131 are the ones she's referring to, I now know, and there's no info on Gryffindor. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 18:45, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Fizzy's Name

Now we know RobertATFM's name is appropriate, is FizzyBongs's name still allowed also despite the drug reference? --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 18:48, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, good point. Righty then... I'm off to try and link some more orphans. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 19:05, December 30, 2012 (UTC)


Hello ProfessorTofty. I wondered, would the page I just created be deemed article-worthy, or is too small or unimportant?

By the way, excellent job with the Time-Turner ideas, and with making Voldy's on his birthday :) --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 22:45, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

RE:Archive & Order

Okay, thanks, and thank you for the Order of Merlin - I thought it was ten thousand for that one. As for the archiving of one's talk page, I thought an admin had to do that...? Thanks. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 22:57, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see. And I feel a tad silly asking, but how does one archive their talk page? --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:00, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year

A Very Happy New Year! Here's hoping that 2013 brings the all the best -- happiness, health and prosperity -- to you and yours. Cheers, --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 23:47, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

New Years'

I know it isn't yet for five hours but as I'll be busy at the time, I figured I'd wish you and your family a happy, healthy, humble and prosperous 2013, and thank you for all the assistance you've provided for me in my first year here at the Harry Potter Wiki. Thanks and Happy New Years'. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 00:33, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

I also wish you a good and healthy Happy New Year with many luck for you and your family!
Cheers,  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 00:38, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year and thank you for sending me an owl to remind me. I will not let you down as possible! --NGC fan (talk) 09:16, January 3, 2013 (UTC)NGC fan

RE:New Years and Archive

Thanks, hopefully I'll remember in three and a half hours that I've already done this... and thanks for the congratulations about the archives; I almost ripped what little hair I have out trying to understand. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 01:25, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Lupin

I was just wondering... what if the IP who keeps on adding "Daniel Lupin" is really J. K. Rowling trying to give us a hint about Lupin's life? Or one of the Pottermore team members who saw it on Lupin's bio? --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 02:19, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I sort of thought of that, but it was worth asking, in my opinion. And we neever know... maybe it was a sort of new years' thing from Pottermore... either way we'll see whenever they decide to release Lupin's bio (hopefully it's as much as was seen in McGonagall's). --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 02:26, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
True. Oh well... come April or May we might get a portion of Lupin's biography. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 02:36, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Which actually leads to an interesting question: What if J.K. Rowling herself started to edit our wiki? That would be a potential problem because either we didn't know it was her (unless she was able to prove it, of course), or because it would be hard to sustain that "Rowling's Word is the Law" while maintaining at the same time that our articles are not to be used as sources in themselves -- and if she added new info directly to the articles, those wouldn't be properly sourced despite the info being canonically valid, and so on, and so on. If she ended up joining iour wiki's editors, I think it would end up being simultaneously wonderful and somewhat disruptive. :P --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 02:53, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
I just had the most vivid mental picture of Flitwick roping off the small patch of the Portable Swamp after the twins left Hogwarts in Order of the Phoenix; and then of us, "roping off" paragraphs with invisible notes saying "BACK OFF -- WRITTEN BY ROWLING HERSELF, CANNOT POSSIBLY BE IMPROVED UPON." Hahaha. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 03:09, January 1, 2013 (UTC)


Hi, I don't know if Pottermore has something done or if it is the other computer I can use today but I could go on on Pottermore. sigh :-)  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 08:42, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

RE:My...Your...Whichever Signature It Is

I added to the signature template, so that should add it everywhere, if I assume correctly? --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 19:30, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Media section

Whew, dodged that bullet. No, j/k. But I am glad we got it worked out. --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 04:35, January 3, 2013 (UTC)


On Hunnie Bunns user page was already the second ID vandaliser who blanked the page and placed insultings. I thought I should tell you. For now I have reverted. Wait and see what happens!  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 21:13, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

Er.. Professor? You do realize that what you claim was's "final warning" was in fact their first warning. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:15, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that's true. I do find it rather funny though. By the way, have you ever heard of Cleverbot? It is a robot that automatically holds conversations. Despite inappropriate language it might use, its conversations about Harry Potter are quite amusing - "Bellatrix is a b****!" "Snape didn't kill Dumbledore, Harry did!" --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:24, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I'd highly recommend it, but I wouldn't recommend talking about Hermione or Ron; it called them "Mudbloods". --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:28, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

This user

Hi Professor. Just figured I'd let you know (if you hadn't seen) that this IP re-added insults to my page that Harry granger removed. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 19:39, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

how long will my block be?

you said if I continued editing the way my older brother is now you said will block me. How long will the block be? I'm not usually active so I don't really care, but still please don't block me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mart456t (talkcontribs).


sorry for those edits me/my older brother were making. on October 21 I was just making a template for the chat and went to the bathroom and then my older brother just got on my account and practically destroyed it. By the way here's the chat template: Template:GoOnChat —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mart456t (talkcontribs).

Admin request

Hello. I figured I'd let you know that I've nominated myself to run for admin status; you can find it, as I'm sure you'll know by now, here. Thanks for taking the time to read this. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:59, January 4, 2013 (UTC)


Just saying Hi. Seanconnoll • Contribs • Contact • Email

May I please...

Use the layout of for my wiki? Seanconnoll • Contribs • Contact • Email

Deletion of Comment

It has come to my attention that you deleted the comment of an anon user over on Red Sparks Talk Page. I'm aware that said comment was obscene, but that gives no reason to delete it completely. I shall say no more, MrSiriusBlack (talk) 10:40, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Layout guide

Professor, I'm not sure if the headings in articles are merely improper or if the layout guide needs updating, so I figured I'd ask you. See, currently the layout guide has a thing at the bottom showing: ==Biography== ==Physical description== ==Personality and traits== ===Relationships=== ==Behind the scenes== ===Name etymology=== ===J. K. Rowling=== ==Appearances== ==Sources== ==Notes and references== {{reflist}} ==See also== ==External links== [[Category:]]

But most articles do not follow this layout. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 21:31, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Hermoine Granger

Very sorry about not knowing about her already being featured, I'll find something else.  Yugimuto1    Talk   63 edits   21:50,1/5/2013 

RE:Layout guide

Ah, I see; thanks for explaining that and for changing the layout guide. And sorry about the previous message being so long and creating separate headings on your page. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 02:10, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Red Sparks

Should we merge the article Periculum and Red Sparks? It says that Periculum shoots red sparks and Red Sparks says it's incantation is Periculum. And I know it have been merged before. Should we? -- 11:19, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Dragon-skin coat

God, it's been almost three years! I guess I postponed that by far too long, haven't I? So, I checked the game, and what I think I was referring to was this item. However, it's labeled as "Dragon Skin Cloak" in the game -- not "coat", as I originally thought. Should we create a new, different page for that garment? --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 01:35, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Re: Comment on Red Sparks Talk Page

Someone's opinion is unconstructive and disruptive, is it, ProfessorTofty? MrSiriusBlack (talk) 19:50, January 7, 2013 (UTC)


You have over seven thousand edits, and I notice nobody as awarded you Order of Merlin First Class. I, not being an Admin, think I am not of - ah - authority to give you the award, so I shall not, but I mentioned it all the same. MrSiriusBlack (talk) 20:09, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

New page missing it's "article"

Someone recently created a page called The Plot to steal the Ravenclaw Diadem but it only has an infobox. I don't think it is a needed article, but that's what I think. Furthermore the name says The plot to instead of saying Plot to as all other "plot"-articles. I'll leave it to you. -- 11:59, January 8, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Your conduct

Well, I'm sorry if my interest in whether or not the Red Sparks-Periculum merge takes place offends you, Professor. MrSiriusBlack (talk) 17:03, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

"Positive Edits"...What is a Negative Edit if it isn't vandalism or being rude to another user? MrSiriusBlack (talk) 17:26, January 9, 2013 (UTC)


Sorry..... Will do next time..... Madeyefire (talk) 22:11, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Pottermore contacts

Hi, thank you for your answer. That was my problem. You cannot know who is that person. But this answer helps. First assume good faith like we do here. When someone goes bad you can report him. O. k., thanks again.
 Harry granger   Talk   contribs 22:21, January 12, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, there you could be right. But I'm not stupid ;-) and do so and I think all the other users are also careful.
 Harry granger   Talk   contribs 22:34, January 12, 2013 (UTC)


Can you change the Featured article. It shozld be Pettigrew now.--Rodolphus (talk) 13:56, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Isn´t the FA change set for today? Madam Hooch should be featured now.

And, I think the Fat Friar has been nominated for over a week with all objections cleaned up. Doesn´t this finally qualify him as an FA?--Rodolphus (talk) 09:29, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

It's a bit late, but...

Congratulations on your promotion to Admin. : ) - Nick O'Demus 00:07, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look at some of the FA nominations a bit later. - Nick O'Demus 03:39, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
Our other Featured Content could use some reviewing too. (The DYK's, QotW's, and SP's.) - Nick O'Demus 17:50, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Barty Crouch Sr.

I'm really sorry, but with two tests tomorrow at school and it being ten o'clock, I feel that I have to get to bed. I've done a small few references for his article, and added a new top quote, but that's all. I promise to finish it up tomorrow. Sorry to not be able to finish what I started. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 03:08, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know

Hey Professor, Idk why Bond hasn't owled you or whatever, but, I'm a Rollback now, Bond is busy on there, and I think it'd make me look good to get this done :P .. So would you be ok with talking to me instead? I know nearly everything he does (i think xD) Colin687

03:57, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

At our wiki, there is not exactly authorization, but I can not see him being angry about it, nor with the other Heads of our wiki. So yes, I think we should discuss what you'd like, and sense I can see you online, how about chat? I'm there. Colin687

04:16, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
No, I had not seen that owl. his Owl imbox gets full often quickly, so finding it would be especially difficult, but I will search through to find it, and possibly talk to you tomorrow. I should be on tomorrow morning at 10 AM central time.If you leave me an owl then, I should be on. Adios for now! (wave) xD Colin687

05:22, January 14, 2013 (UTC)


It feels like cheating, but I went online and found an online PDF of the American version, which I'm going to be using as the chapters are supposedly the same. So thanks for the offer but I managed, luckily, to find the information required.

As for the removal of that information, it was the same problem - I went through every mention of Barty Crouch in my paperback and it wasn't until I went through the digital one that I found that the titles and family were valid. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 22:15, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Recent issues

No offence meant, but if not for your recent revert that might have been fixed. I had everything laid out but due to your edit could not publish it. Oh well... tomorrow I'll start again fresh. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:10, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Oh... if I'd known that I wouldn't get in trouble for reverting your edit in order to clean up after mine own, I would have simply done so before responding. I suppose I'd best get on it, then... --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 23:52, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Videos and references issue

Good to know. Thanks. - Nick O'Demus 00:00, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

If you've got a minute, could you do me a favor and take a look at something? Hunnie Bunn asked me to check a couple of links as possible references, but I'm not able to connect to them, and I've tried 3 different browsers. They also mentioned that my name wasn't showing up orange font (presumably on the Recent Changes), but it does for me. I'd appreciate a second opinion so I could know on whose end the problem lies. You can see the details under "Sources" on my talk page and "RE:Sources" on his. - Nick O'Demus 00:19, January 16, 2013 (UTC)


Hey Professor, from what I got out of your owl, you would like us to have an affiliates section toward your wiki. Thing is, we already have one. If you're asking for us to add the graphical link to our page, I could arrange that if you'd like.

On YOUR affiliates page, I do not believe we are on there and I'm not sure if you would like to create that or if you would like me to make that graphical link. I would suggest you make it, because I have never made one before, but setting your up on our page I WOULD no how to do because the pic is already there.

With the Fanon thing, yes, I would see our wiki as non-fanon, but I'm not sure exactly where you would like to get rid of that, so if I could have a link or something similar, I would be happy to do so.

I have no problem with the message currently there, but I could ask Bond what he thinks of that. That's all I've got, thanks for your time. Colin687

18:06, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Redirect pages

That is certainly your privilege. MinorStoop 20:44, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

I will point out that the fake sword plays an important part in Deathly Hallow. It is no big deal if it is the only other sword mentioned in the series, but if there are more, that may cause some confusion. I do not recall any, though. MinorStoop 20:48, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
This fits perfectly rhe requirements. Thank you. MinorStoop 04:45, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

Whoa dude! Chill.

Whoa dude! Chill. I'm Belac Reteet. If you realy want me to stop, then say it nicley. There's realy no need to get agressive, I can take a hint. I would also like to say that if Animagi have anilmal DNA, that at least makes them part humans.

Please respond. Catch ya later!belacreteet (talk) 22:49, January 17, 2013 (UTC)


Hmmm, you present a farely well reasoned argument. Very well. I will abbandon my caimpang, as it were.

PS By the way, when I was re adding those pages to the half-breed category, I only had one message. I didn't get that one from the Honey Bun dude until later on. And I didn't start re editing until after I had left an explanitory message on the first one's talk page.

PPS I'm Belac Reteet.

PPPS Catch ya later! belacreteet (talk) 23:26, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Capitalization

Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MinorStoop (talkcontribs). 18:56, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

Guess occasionally even I lapse. :) MinorStoop 00:01, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Avery Jr.

I wonder which of the Death Eater in 4 film was Avery? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talkcontribs).

Sounds Good

That sounds sounds good. I'll be sure to check around the wiki and see where I can help. Catch ya later!

PS I'm Belac Reteet.belacreteet (talk) 03:05, January 19, 2013 (UTC)


LOL. I see you noticed. Saying "I'm Belac Reteet" is my signature man, much as saying "Catch ya later". You know what, I'm starting to like you Proff Tofty. Catch ya later!

PS I'm Belac Reteet.

PPS LOL.belacreteet (talk) 03:15, January 19, 2013 (UTC)


Professor, I was wondering what the category organization is on this wiki. A cursory perusal of them does seem to indicate that it falls way short from a tree - Banshee, for example, is categorized as Banshees and Creatures; the latter being redundant, since it includes the "Banshee" category. Bandon Banshee is only categorized as "Banshee", and not, like the other two Banshee pages, also as Spirits.

Considering that the wiki has over 10000 pages, I do not look forward to doing an overhaul of the categories, devising a rational tree, fighting to implement it, and safeguarding it afterwards from people who do not care about studying the situation before randomly adding or removing categories from pages. MinorStoop 11:34, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

That's going to be a hell of a job, giving a comb-over to 10500 pages - some of which I'll probably need to learn why they've been categorized a certain way. But I'm certainly willing to see how far I can go. MinorStoop 17:58, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
Say, Professor, are "Beings" to be considered "Creatures"?
Another point, many categories in Narcissa Malfoy's page were under the form, for example, [[Category:Death Eater allies|Narcissa Malfoy]], instead of simply [[Category:Death Eater allies]]. Since I saw this repeated also in another page, is there any reason for it?
MinorStoop 09:32, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
Another question. How strict is the alfabetical arrangement of categories on pages? You can't do much else for the pages where there are many of them, but those with three or four?
BTW, it looks like some cleanup is still to be made. MinorStoop 11:24, January 20, 2013 (UTC)


Sorry, I didn't know. Please let me know when you need to though. Also, how do you find articles to edit when they are all perfect?  Yugimuto1    Talk   63 edits   11:50,1/20/2013 


MinorStoop has been removing categories that are necessary, such as Hogwarts Students on the Harry Potter page, and the Myrtle page. I'm trying my best to revert them all, but it will take a while. Please let MinorStoop know not to remove necessary categories.  Yugimuto1    Talk   63 edits   12:54,1/20/2013 


Sorry to bother you, but I had a few questions/comments:

  1. I figured I'd let you know this user has been adding multiple fanon pages even after being warned.
  2. I figured I'd ask you whether The Complete Idiot's Guide to Harry Potter could be considered canon or no.

Thanks for taking the time to read all this. --Hunnie Bunn (Owl me!) 14:16, January 20, 2013 (UTC)


You said on my talk page that you consider grooning a particular article to nominate it. May I ask which article you are referring to?--Rodolphus (talk) 16:39, January 20, 2013 (UTC)


Thanks for taking care of the user. And pertaining to the guidebooks... if all of the information in the guidebook perfectly reflected canon, except for giving a certain spell a name it didn't have in the book, would we be able to use that name? Other sources for the name include this wiki and this fansite (ironically, the fansite adheres to canon more strictly than the wiki). --Hunnie Bunn (Owl me!) 17:11, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Possibly same character

Hello ProfessorTofty I noticed that: Unidentified Death Eater (III) and Unidentified Male Death Eater (III) has the same costume .If it's the same character then we're on this Wiki progressed a further .Talk it over with the other Admins .


Okeedoke. However I would like to know whether I can add ghosts and vampires to the undead category. Please give me an answere as soon as you can. Catch ya later!

PS I'm Belac Reteet.belacreteet (talk) 22:14, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Gotcha. Thanks for info. I'll get back to going over your wiki's policies. Catch ya later!

PS I'm Belac Reteet. belacreteet (talk) 22:20, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I'll remember that. Catch ya later!belacreteet (talk) 22:33, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

More questions...

Sorry to bother, but I wondered what your opinion, if you had one, was on this matter and whether you could please provide a response on it on the adequate talk page. Thank you. --Hunnie Bunn (Owl me!) 23:09, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to read my message and for responding to it so quickly, as well as for the speedy reply to my other queries. --Hunnie Bunn (Owl me!) 23:15, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Okay Fine

Okay, fine. But let me say, for the record, that Horcruxes are sentient, and that (in my opinion, makes them beings. I would also like to no what rule I broke my adding them to the undead categorey page.

PS Please cut me a break. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Belac Reteet (talkcontribs).

Concerning Horcruxes

Horcruxes are sentient, and I get this from Riddles diary (a fairly intelligent fellow) Nagini (a living and sentient creature) the Locket (which spent five minutes talking to Ron) Harry Potter (an actual person) and the fact that Horcruxes scream every time they're killed.belacreteet (talk) 23:29, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Concerning MinorStoop


Alright, look. Sorry for losing my temper. But try to put yourself in my shoes for a minute. Believe it or not I was a little stressed out under the circumstances. And what you said about not adding indivuals to the undead category page contradicts what you recently said about me having permision to add vampires but not Vampire itself. It doesn't make sense. Do I have permision to add Vampire to the Undead page. If not, why. If I can add indivisual vampire's, why not the Vampire page. I would like you to explain this to me.

PS Please read my "Concerning Horcruxes" message.

PPS How long am I grounded from adding categories.


Where does this image come from: File:Dumbledore&Harry.jpg? --Station7 (talk) 23:49, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I understand that, but is it from a deleted scene? :) --Station7 (talk) 12:47, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

That's a good idea. --Station7 (talk) 17:16, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Please respond

I don't know if you got my latest mesage, but I would appreciate it if you would read it ad give me a response.belacreteet (talk) 03:50, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Well, alright

Well, alright. Since you put it that way. When it comes to what you said about vampires, I see your point.

However, when it comes to opinion, I still believe horcruxes to be sentient. The reason why is quite simple; when a peice of the soul is broken off, developes a personality identical to it's owner. This is clearly demonstrated in the books by Riddles Diary. I don't see how you could deny that it was a living thinking entity. Also the Locket of Slytherin proved to be equaly intelligent. That, in addition to the fact that all horcruxes are the same, proves my theory about the being beings.

They also fit the discription used in the Undead category page "Beings and/or entities that are not proper life forms but are not truly dead". Therefore (in my opinion) they can be clasified as both beings and undead. With that I will rest my case. Catch ya later!

PS Did you mean "don't create any more category pages" or "don't add category links to pages"?

PPS I'm Belac Reteet.belacreteet (talk) 04:18, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Well, alright. Since you put it that way. When it comes to what you said about vampires, I see your point.

However, when it comes to opinion, I still believe horcruxes to be sentient. The reason why is quite simple; when a peice of the soul is broken off, developes a personality identical to it's owner. This is clearly demonstrated in the books by Riddles Diary. I don't see how you could deny that it was a living thinking entity. Also the Locket of Slytherin proved to be equaly intelligent. That, in addition to the fact that all horcruxes are the same, proves my theory about them being beings.

They also fit the discription used in the Undead category page "Beings and/or entities that are not proper life forms but are not truly dead". Therefore (in my opinion) they can be clasified as both beings and undead. With that I will rest my case. Catch ya later!

PS Did you mean "don't create any more category pages" or "don't add category links to pages"?

PPS I'm Belac Reteet.belacreteet (talk) 04:20, January 21, 2013 (UTC)


Yeah, thanks. I do intend to come back eventually, but it'll be quite some time. Furthering my education and all that. I'll have some free time, but I won't have much in the way of computer access to come on here during it. I might make edits from time to time when I can get on a computer or am visiting home. -- 1337star (Drop me a line!) 04:55, January 21, 2013 (UTC)


Thanks for the tip man! I just posted a comment on the Horcrux talk page, and I think I might actualy bend a public opinion! Sorry for the silly misunderstandings earlier. Catch ya later!

PS I'm Belac Reteet.belacreteet (talk) 05:44, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Little help?

I'm Belac Reteet. Yeah, well this is embarasing. I left a message on the Horcrux talk page reguarding sentient horcruxes, but I couldn't figure out how to add tha Talk template you mentioned. I really don't have all these tecnical thing mastered. Could you give me a hand? Catch ya later!belacreteet (talk) 19:37, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks man, but I already got a reply. Sadly it disagreed with me, but I won't be stopped that easily. Catch ya later!belacreteet (talk) 02:50, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+